Quote:
Originally Posted by alwayslearning
This thread is a discussion about Cahn's talk and it is what I am addressing. Nobody and especially me are asking you to have Cahn speak for you. On the contrary the reasonable request is being made that you listen to what he has to say and let us know what you think about it like the rest of us are doing. After that we can have an informed discussion about it.
|
Well then why don't you follow your "reasonable request" instead of pontificating.
Referring to Washington’s inauguration is very relevant. As he points out this is where the country was first consecrated. And the location of that consecration was in fact ground zero. This certainly supports his thesis. We were told at our consecration the condition of God blessing us”. God’s blessing is equivalent to the “propitious smiles of Heaven” and it is based on the eternal rules which Heaven has ordained.
The man is giving a speech on inauguration day to pray for the blessings of this country. It is certainly relevant to refer to Washington's first inauguration speech and the consecration of the nation which occurred at a church in NYC which was coincidentally located at ground zero. In this speech Washington says that we as a nation can only expect God's blessings if we obey the eternal rules of God ordained by Heaven. Which is the man's thesis. Your entire argument about the constitution and all this other drivel is a straw man.