![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 2
|
![]() Quote:
Answer: If you do a little research (homework), you will see: For example: IF, Mt has 1400 verses in the whole book. And IF, there are 500 verses in Mt that are quotations from the Old Testament; for Mt would be: 36 % of the OT. Then, if you do the same thing for every book of the New Testament, you will find out that 58 % of the OT is in the NT. But again, I say to you what I said to Drake: I can see that you are not understanding about Israelology. The exercise of showing the 83% is a very, very small part of the subject. That is only showing you how much (83%) of the “Biblical text” talks about Israel. Please understand that Israelology is not a “percentage”. Moving forward to the “real” subject. If you remember the “title” of my post is: “MAJOR” Errors of W. Lee’s Teaching. That means that Israelology is a “major” topic that W. Lee did not consider in his Life Studies. He spoke about Israel, but he applied to the church what is for Israel with the wrong interpretation. Pick up any Life Study of the Old Testament and you will see that he ends up sharing from the New Testament bringing the “church in”. For you to have some idea of what Israelology is, I can show you what the experts have to say. Israelology is a huge topic in the Bible. Please read this little portion and then you can do your homework on your own and come to your own conclusions. You don’t have to believe anything I say, that is what Acts 17:11 is telling you. ISRAELOLOGY Part 1 of 6 by Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum INTRODUCTION The issue of Israel is one of the major points of division in evangelical theology today. This is true both among Arminians and Calvinists. An evangelical theologian's view of Israel will determine whether he is a Covenant Theologian or a Dispensationalist. It will also determine what kind of Covenant Theologian he is: postmillennial, amillennial, or premillennial. The question of Israel is central for a proper Systematic Theology. Paul, in his epistle to the Romans, which contains the first Systematic Theology in Church history, expounds on Israel in the center of his epistle devoting three full chapters (9-11) out of sixteen to this topic. Yet, while there are many Systematic Theologies today that have systematized all areas of biblical truth, none thus far has developed an Israelology as part of their system. These articles will survey what the concerns of an Israelology would be.1 DEFINITION OF TERMS Important terms are used throughout this study that should be defined as part of the introduction. Systematic Theology A science which follows a humanly devised scheme or order of doctrinal development and which purports to incorporate into its system all the truth about God and His universe from any and every source. Systematic Theology may be defined as the collecting, scientifically arranging, comparing, exhibiting, and de- 1 For a detailed systematized Israelology, see this author's work, Israelology: The Missing Link in Systematic Theology (Tustin, CA: Ariel Ministries Press, fending of all facts from any and every source concerning God and His works.2. Israelology This term refers to a subdivision of Systematic Theology incorporating all theological doctrines concerning the people of Israel. Israel As used in this study, the term Israel is viewed theologically as referring to all descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, also known as the Jews, the Jewish people, Israelites, Hebrews, etc.3 The term is not limited to the present political and national state in the Middle East, which is merely a part of the whole; nor is it limited to those who adhere to the religion of Judaism only. THE PLACE OF ISRAELOLOGY IN SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY In every work of Systematic Theology, Israelology is found missing as a major division. In all Systematic Theologies, what exists of Israelology will only be partially developed. In Covenant Theology, the development will be minimal. In Dispensationalism, Israelology is only fully developed in its future aspect, not in its past and present aspects. Logically, Israelology must come just before Ecclesiology [the study the Church] and follow the same development. Both are a people of God but, historically, Israel precedes the Church. As Ecclesiology has been developed in its past, present, and future aspects, so must Israelology be. Only then will Systematic Theology be truly complete. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|