“Local Church ‘Cult’ Label has stuck”—says LSM Star turned Academic

[awareness]

Originally Posted by Terry

Used to be in announcements when I used to attend 2009/2010, weekly soliciting giving to DCP for defense against the internet.
Speaking of DCP I believe it was late 2011/early 2012 "Indiana" called DCP offering to meet with them. They were conveniently unavailable. Probably as Freedom said; "silence as an admission of guilt". Articles such as Steve Isitt among others they don't want to address.
1. It would provide free advertisement.
2. In their conscience the brothers at DCP know Steve is accurate in his writings.
3. Should they ever entertain initiating a lawsuit, do they really want to risk having to subject the blended coworkers to depositions? As there is nothing to be gained by it.

I think the reason Teresa Zimmerman-Liu probably didn't say the local church is a cult is because she feared she and U of C would likely be sued by them.

No matter. They walk like a duck and quack like a duck. Maybe they should sue themselves, for proving they're a cult more than the PRC or cult busters here in America.

[Freedom]

Originally Posted by awareness

No matter. They walk like a duck and quack like a duck. Maybe they should sue themselves, for proving they're a cult more than the PRC or cult busters here in America.

You're too funny