Apostles

[ZNPaaneah]

Originally Posted by Ohio

I should say that those who left did talk privately to those who asked. I have not found anything that was written, however. In this regard, related to all the storms that originated in Anaheim, TC used to boast that no brother under his care ever became a problem to the Recovery.

If a leader needs his former workers to be silent at their departure, then he is not beyond reproach, and must have much to hide. There is no record in the N.T. of Paul abusing his co-workers, so LC leaders who abuse one another are without Biblical support. Thus they desire departing workers to maintain "radio silence" at all costs.

An elder should be beyond reproach, therefore you don't need to worry about someone "making trouble".

Second, an accusation against an elder should not be heard unless by 2 or 3 credible witnesses. This forum has provided that and more. So if the LRC refuses to hear they have an issue with the Lord Jesus. It is not rebellion to bring an accusation against an elder, if done properly and according to the scripture.

Third, it is perfectly reasonable to examine a witness. You might be interested in motive or credibility issues. Therefore, taking a stand outside of the LRC where you have nothing to gain other than standing for the truth in love may be where the Lord has led you.

Fourth, many of the witnesses on this forum are elders. JI is merely one example. Therefore they also should be afforded the same standard. I think it is fair to consider WL and KR as credible witnesses, but on the other hand I think it is equally fair to consider JI, JS, and BM credible witnesses.