![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 155
|
![]() Quote:
Every prophetic speaking is addressed to an audience. As I read my Bible over the years, I began to realize that I could connect most of these audiences (directly or indirectly) back to Genesis 10 (aka "table of nations"). This table includes both God's OT people, the enemies of God's OT people and other more distant lands who didn't interact with God's OT people. Even now, there remain unfulfilled prophecies to various "Audiences of God" that were composed under one "dispensation". The transition to a new "dispensation" has not invalidated God's word or the audience it is addressed to. We have to map forward these audiences captured in the Old Testament to the equivalent audience in the time the prophecy is fulfilled. For this forum topic, we are interested in how these audiences map to the End Times. I have thought quite a bit about how this type of mapping can work. For example, let's use one particular audience to think about the mapping process... Greece. Genesis 10:2-5 Quote:
Here are a few examples of references to Javan, Greece/Greeks and the coastlands. This is not a full list of references:
If you review these examples, you will see that God is specifically targeting prophetic speaking to the Grecian/Greek "people grouping" established in the "table of nations" of Genesis 10. Some of God's targeted prophetic speaking HASN'T HAPPENED YET. So, how do we map God's speaking forward in time??? Methods of Mapping 1. Is it Future bloodline lineal descendants which may not be identifiable as a grouping in modern times? 2. Is it a Future nation, people grouping, and/or culture with the same or changed name? 3. Is it a Future nation, people grouping, and/or culture under the same spiritual dominion with the same OR different name? 4. Is it some combination of #1-#3 I know I cannot give a fully definitive answer and say it is only #1, #2 or #3 or even a combination (#4). I have seen passages that could work with any of these mappings. I have seen other passages where only one of these "methods of mapping" seems to make any sense. I do not presume to be able to resolve this challenge, but instead I hold the relevant scripture in my mind "loosely" as God's word that will be fulfilled exactly as it was said to "Audience of God" to whom He directed it. I don't let my ideas of "dispensationalism" override the direct prophetic speaking of God even though I cannot fully comprehend the meaning of some of these prophetic speakings. The main point of sharing this in response to your comment about dispensationalism is to introduce the idea of the "Audiences of God" and that as I have read what The Author of these prophecies has said and the audiences that The Author uses I find that I rarely even consider the word "dispensation" or "dispensationalism". After a while, I realized that some of what I was learning sometimes cut through dispensational thinking. This doesn't destroy the idea dispensationalism. I have just learned to put "dispensational thinking" in it's place. It is a conceptualization of man (not God) about the truth of God's word and its application across the ages which may not hold up. The ("I don't think there is a resurrection") Saduccees found out about how their reasoning and conceptualization of the topic of resurrection held up when they spoke to The Author. Matthew 22:29 Quote:
Matt p.s. next comes the rapture... |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|