Whistleblower

[awareness]

I've been reviewing this thread, and I'm so far left confused. Somebody help me please.

Have we determined beyond a shadow of doubt that rape was committed?

In the c. in Ft. Lauderdale there was a brother I knew but wasn't close to. I didn't get to know him until after leaving the LC.

Turns out he was caught several times in the parking lot doing the nasty with the young daughters of the saints. The girls were underage, but were active participants in the deed. He was dealt with in each case, it was statutory rape, but the law was never called. Why? Because it would have brought public scandal and shame to the church ... and to the Lord.

This matter of public scandal is what motivates the cover up. We see it today with e RCC, who is presently sitting on evidence of sexual crimes upon young boys by declaring the sovereignty of the state of the Vatican. But it happens in churches all across this land, of the Protestant sort too, not just in the local churches.

And no one wants to shame the church. For obvious reasons. No one wants to shame the Lord.

Churches, of course, are full of sinners, so sins are going to happen. And when they happen the reflex of the loyal members is going to be to cover it up ... especially if it was a crime. And who pays the price? The victim.

Have we determined beyond a shadow of doubt that Philip Lee committed rape? Or that other like crimes were covered up?

Have I missed something? I haven't seen that yet.