Is the Processed, Four-in-One God a sound doctrine?

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by Bible-believer

My families and friends are in the group. I realize I can't say anything against Lee's teaching before them, or I will be in trouble. I've tried to tell them there is something wrong with Lee's teaching, yet they would reply to me with more Lee's writings. I know it's not right to keep silent, but what should I do? I can't just leave there and let them stay in the group. I don't know if there is any kind of sorcery; I learn the longer a man stays and listens to Lee's teaching, the harder it is for him to awake.

Use their own words against them, for example ...

Watchman Nee: "The Bible is our only standard. We are not afraid to preach the pure Word of the Bible, even if men oppose; but if it is not the Word of the Bible, we could never agree even if everyone approved of it."

When the Blendeds excommunicated the Midwest, Nigel Tomes wrote an article addressing this. This forum is filled with healthy Biblical exegesis exposing LC errant eisegesis.

Apostle Paul regularly admonished the church to prove the will of God (Romans 12.2-3) and to test all things (I Thess 5.21). We should never just accept one man's teachings as gospel truth. The Bereans were esteemed because they examined the scriptures daily concerning Paul's ministry. Even Apostle Paul's teachings were tested, examined, and proven.

Before my entire region was "quarantined," there was endless debate about whether the young people in the Recovery should study the teachings of Lee before reading the Bible (dangerous eisegesis method), or have a solid foundation in the scripture before reading Lee's messages (accepted exegesis method.)