Is the Processed, Four-in-One God a sound doctrine?

[Zezima]

The entire movement of the Lord’ Recovery is predicated on Witness Lee being the minister of the age or apostle of the age. So no matter how much you reveal to members of the Lord‘s recovery they will always fall back on that idea. That this specific man received divine revelation and while they might not see it that revelation.. he saw it.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by Zezima

The entire movement of the Lord’ Recovery is predicated on Witness Lee being the minister of the age or apostle of the age. So no matter how much you reveal to members of the Lord‘s recovery they will always fall back on that idea. That this specific man received divine revelation and while they might not see it that revelation.. he saw it.

When I realized that the Plymouth Brethren, supposedly our Recovery forebears, embraced the exact same errant dogma, and today his name is Bruce Hales, my mind was freed. Then I learned that this MOTA stronghold was based on Popery. Then I learned about every LC "storm" was actually honest men of God just crying out for righteousness.

[Bible-believer]

Originally Posted by Zezima

The entire movement of the Lord’ Recovery is predicated on Witness Lee being the minister of the age or apostle of the age. So no matter how much you reveal to members of the Lord‘s recovery they will always fall back on that idea. That this specific man received divine revelation and while they might not see it that revelation.. he saw it.

That's is true. That's what they say all the time whenever anyone proposes different perspectives.
I don't think Lee was an apostle receiving the divine revelation at all, but just a man who came up with his own interpretation regarding the Scriptures.
Rev. 2:2I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars: