POLL: What is the Greatest Error of WL & LC?

[Curious]

Thanks, UntoHim, for your kind words.

I agree with you that motivation is not easily tangeable and often more clear in hindsight rather than on the ground, so to speak. Doctrine is a much clearer area, and avoids judging personally.

Doctrine/teachings are objective, motivation exists in a more subjective field. Though it can be exposed through considering multiple dodgy doctrines and theology, I'm my opinion.

Restoring sound theology is certainly a very good and important task for this forum. I was only exposed to a limited amount of LC peculiar doctrines, by the members I knew, so I'm not too qualified to engage in these discussions as you all. But I can verify them from my experiences though.

[Sons to Glory!]

Agree that motivations are often hard to determine and measure. However, we can more clearly see the fruit of someone's motivation. What we have now in the LC, at least from what I can tell, is the fruit is greatly Lee-centric and not Christ-centric. They may talk about Christ, but it's all from the standpoint of Lee's teaching, etc. And the gatherings, again as far as I can tell, focus more on testifying of Lee rather than testifying of the real and fresh experiences Christ.