Boxjobox on modalism

[UntoHim]

Originally Posted by UntoHim

There are certain things that are not up for debate here on the main forum. One of them is the deity of Christ... There are a number of other nonnegotiables as far as I'm concerned, but I won't take the time to reiterate them here.
However, since the very topic at hand is addressing Lee's non orthodox teachings, it seems reasonable for the various forum members to give their current views/understandings of the nature of the Trinity/Godhead.

Originally Posted by Sons to Glory!

This seems like a mixed message . . . sorry but I'm struggling with what's permissible and what is not. That is, the first paragraph seems to say one thing - a narrow defining, but then gets at least a little reversed and broadened in the second paragraph.

No mixed message my friend. The first paragraph was addressing Boxjobox's Unitarian views which I will not allow to be aired over on the main forum.

The second paragraph is a different subject - I was letting people know that expressing personal views concerning the nature of God/Trinity was perfectly acceptable on a thread about Lee's modalistic teachings.
I hope that clears things up for you.
-