Publication Work in The Lord's Recovery aka The One Publication

[Ohio]

A number of great papers were written on this subject of One Publication.

Here is a brief response by Professor and Brother Nigel Tomes to Benson Philips, President of LSM, who instituted this disastrous policy which later divided all the LC's:

Nigel Tomes, "If One Publication is causing Division, How Many Publications will create Oneness?" - A Rejoinder to Bro. Benson Phillips.

A number of other articles are published on the Concerned Brothers site such as these:

• Nigel Tomes' "PUBLICATION WORK IN THE LORD’S RECOVERY” – ANALYSIS & RESPONSE - Response and Fellowship to LSM's Booklet on One Publication. (English)
• Nigel Tomes' Letter to the Letter from Southern California Coworkers. (English)
  
• Nigel Tomes, "The Bible: Our Only Standard" (English)
• Nigel Tomes, "Honesty in History - Aginst Historical Revisionism" (English)
• Nigel Tomes, "The One Publication Campaign" (English)
• Nigel Tomes, "LSM’s Eisegesis - How Not To Interpret the Bible!" (English)

[awareness]

“The Scriptural Basis of One Publication” – According to the LSM-brothers
The LSM-brothers assert that ‘One Publication’
“is solidly based on many fundamental
Scriptural principles, including the following:

1. the uniqueness of the teaching and fellowship of the apostles,
2. the apostles teaching the same thing in every church,
3. the Lord's speaking to one church being His speaking to all of the churches,
4. the oneness of the Body of Christ,
5. the one accord,
6. thinking the same thing,
7. speaking the same thing,
8. the one ministry of the New Testament,
9. the one work with one goal, and
10. serving in the one flow of the Lord's move.”

Sounds like The One Publican in the local church is tantamount to The Book of Mormon to the LDS ... minus Moroni and the golden plates ... but with Nee and Lee as their idols.

[Ohio]

With these many demands, just stick to the Bible, the One Publication Policy by LSM negates them all.

[awareness]

Originally Posted by Ohio

With these many demands, just stick to the Bible, the One Publication Policy by LSM negates them all.

The LDS have Joseph Smith Jr. and Brigham Young. They organized the Church of Christ, later LDS, calling it a restoration of the early Christian church.

The local church have Nee and Lee, claiming the same thing. And they have their Book of Mormon. They just call it One Publication ; Their canon ; Their 'book of Mormon.'

Which one is better? They're both personality cults -- for them they have Smith Jr. & Young, for the LC they have Nee and Lee. What I'd like to know is, which one is less of a cult than the other?

My judgement is biased ... skewed, if you will. I fell for the Nee-Lee. So that's not a cult as much as the LDS to me.

But upon closer look, I'm not so sure.