![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,826
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() So Hank was among you guys for 6 long years and didn't know how to touch his spirit? Really? This sounds more like a problem with the teachers more than the student. Well maybe if Hanegraaff had spent more time learning the Local Church lingo and traditions instead writing amicus briefs and publishing driveling, pathetic retractions, he would be standing, pumping his first and calling "OOOOOHHHH, LLLOOOOORRRRRD, JEEEEEESUS as I write this post. -
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,965
|
![]()
So they are not going to the FTT because they care too much about their appearance . That says more about them than the training doesn't it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
![]()
CRI can't claim to be against Christian cults any longer, if Hank is their example.
First they said that Lee's local church was a cult. Then they said they were wrong. Then Hank joins another cult. CRI is now actually cult friendly.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,965
|
![]()
As much as people would like to think that Hank chose the EOC to "get away from" the local churches, that is probably not the case. He chose the EOC because of Watchman Nee's teachings and a desire to be made God. For this reason a better question to ask is why did he not stay in evangelicalism? (because they don't teach about becoming God).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 203
|
![]()
Wow, I think theosis has became one of the tenets of the Christian Faith.
![]()
__________________
If there is anything that the people of our day need to realize, it is these very words of Jonah, simple yet neglected: “Salvation is of the LORD.” ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,693
|
![]() Quote:
All they got are a few lines from Athanasius.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,965
|
![]() Quote:
Do we really think if it was so heretical they would have talked about it in such a candid way? I don't. In fact, during the time when the Trinity was defined and real heretics were hunted down and killed, no one thought to mention the "heresy" of theosis/man becoming God. The simple reason is it was not a heresy. I wonder what Jesus thinks every time a key teaching and blessing of God is called a heresy by those who know no better. It might remind us of the Sadducee who denied the resurrection. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,965
|
![]()
The historical evidence is overwhelming that deification was a fundamental aspect of the doctrine of salvation in the time of the early church. Those who defined the Trinity against heresies all believed in it. We may say that salvation without deification is not really salvation at all, to emphasize the important that it held in the early church.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,622
|
![]()
So do Nee's teachings promote theosis (I guess I've learned a new word)?
My thinking is that most of us (i.e., Christians) don't have much of a revelation of who we really have been made in Christ. Most Christian speakings I have an opportunity to listen to on radio or TV are more concerned with the redemption aspect of the good news, and then what we must do afterward - but they preach it mostly in an Old Covenant way. It is rare when one of these ones will expound well on "what are the riches of the glory of His inheritance in the saints." There is so, so much more to be seen in scripture regarding who we really are in Him! My current understanding of this revelation in scripture is we are being made one in life and nature with God (e.g., John 17), but that we do not become part of the omnipotent Godhead, right? But from what I've read on here, many think WL crossed over that line - is that correct?
__________________
LC Berkeley 70s; LC Columbus OH 80s; An Ekklesia in Scottsdale 98-now |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,826
|
![]()
Actually, Witness Lee did something much worse than simply crossing over the line - he tried to move the line itself....and then claim to anyone who would listen "this is the line of orthodoxy...all you poor, poor Christians have been getting it all wrong for over 2,000 years. The line is actually not there...it is over here, where I say it is!" Of course Lee was not the only one who tried to pull a fast one on us gullible American Christians...but he is the one we are all most familiar with. I only mention this to head certain people off at the pass before they cry out "that guy over there said something just like that!" or "that guy over there taught the exact same thing and you didn't call him a heretic!". So, don't say I didn't warn you....wait for it....here it comes...
![]() -
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|