Now's good - byHismercy

[Drake]

Originally Posted by aron

So if she says we're "bitter and angry" you agree. If she says that we had "thwarted ambitions" you agree. But if I say that Lee was "bitter and angry" then that's a personal attack? If we say Lee was voracious for the parishioner's money that's an unfounded personal assault?

Why the double standards?

Have you ever read The Fermentation of the Present Rebellion? If you want to see ad hominem attacks, they're there. But I never once saw Lee called to task in the LC for his characterisations of others.

She is referring to the anger and bitterness served up in this forum day in and day out. You don’t see that? Or are you arguing for moral equivalency?

Drake