Quote:
Originally Posted by A little brother
This is an irrelevant question. The answer would be more than a simple yes or no and needs much more lengtly discussion. Let's not divert from the current focus.
You are correct, I did not quote the entire footnote. That's why I put the "..." in my quote to indicate I was extracting part of the footnote relevant to my point.
Whether the remaining part of the footnote is valid or not does not change the fact that Lee misinterpreted Micah. And I believe the reason is because Lee was so sure about his vision on God's economy that it became the veil between him and God's word.
|
Alb,
The point of the footnote is clear and your parsing it misrepresents it.
Christ replaced the law and God’s people should live Christ rather than keep the law. That is the point. What is Micah 6:8 referring to? Keeping the law.
Drake