"A Brief History of the Lord's Move in Europe"

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by Koinonia

A Brief History of the Lord's Move in Europe (September 2017)

Conveniently expunged John So and all the other precious saints from their history?

Kind of like how the Darby Exclusive Brethren blotted out Benjamin Newton, George Muller, and others who rejected their domination.

A word to the wise. No history coming out of LSM has ever been anything but self-serving historical revisionism.

[ZNPaaneah]

Maybe that is why it called "a brief history" rather than a "comprehensive" or "complete" or "accurate" history.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah

Maybe that is why it called "a brief history" rather than a "comprehensive" or "complete" or "accurate" history.

A brief biased history from a blended ...

[eDh22]

Originally Posted by Ohio

A brief biased history from a blended ...

The funniest thing is how this document cites Lee and only Lee so heavily on each page ("then as Brother Lee points out"), as if he was the only person to cover the history of the Reformation. As a church kid, I was so surprised visiting Amish, Moravian, etc communities and finding that their recountings were pretty much identical to the ones I had heard attributed merely to the insights of the great Lee. Until the 20th century, which belongs exclusively to Nee and Lee, of course. Actually, the bias in this history is not funny, it's repulsive.

[TLFisher]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Conveniently expunged John So and all the other precious saints from their history?

Kind of like how the Darby Exclusive Brethren blotted out Benjamin Newton, George Muller, and others who rejected their domination.

A word to the wise. No history coming out of LSM has ever been anything but self-serving historical revisionism.

Conveniently indeed. It would be more appropriate to say "History of the Lord's Move in Europe in the 21st Century".