Local Church Discussions  

Go Back   Local Church Discussions > Apologetic discussions

Apologetic discussions Apologetic Discussions Regarding the Teachings of Watchman Nee and Witness Lee

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-25-2017, 02:56 AM   #1
aron
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Natal Transvaal
Posts: 5,632
Default Re: "The Multiple Invisibilities of Witness Lee"

One can see subjective experience leading the prophet astray, by considering his teaching against clear NT precedent.

Jesus said, "These things were written concerning Me." WL said, "No they weren't; they were the OT prophet writing about himself, according to his fallen human imagination."

Peter said, "David, being a prophet, knew that God had promised a Seed. ." WL accepted that only for the citation in question, from Psalm 16, but elsewhere when the psalmist wrote similarly that "He rescued me because He delighted in me" WL said, "No, God did not delight in David the sinner." NT precedent was ignored, even overturned. The "mystical Christ" of WL's subjective experience caused him to not see Jesus in the confessional text, even though the writers of the NT had done this repeatedly before him (cf Heb 2:9 &c).

I'm not claiming that my interpretation is right & WL's is wrong; rather that WL's experience narrowed his perception, and his discipleship programme kept anyone else from seeing what he couldn't see, even when a pattern in NT reception suggested otherwise.
__________________
"Freedom is free. It's slavery that's so horribly expensive" - Colonel Templeton, ret., of the 12th Scottish Highlanders, the 'Black Fusiliers'
aron is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 PM.


3.8.9