![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Natal Transvaal
Posts: 5,632
|
![]() Quote:
And if miracles did in fact occur, why not the miracle of a young woman giving birth? The fiance was going to put her away quietly, to hide the shame, but she said that it was God who did it. So he believed, and took her as his wife. The guy believed. So, sue him, right - the dork, the schmuck. The putz. He believed. I really don't have any problem with this miracle as portrayed. Still, Timotheist has done a good job with his investigation and it's worth considering the texts... and I'll say this in favor of Timotheist's emerging, "alternate" narrative: for all his talk of the "humanity" of Jesus, WL pretty much skipped it in favor of the "Processed Incarnated Father Jehovah" Jesus. Which makes no sense to me, because then the simple pronouns like "I" and "You" don't convey meaning any more. If the text says, "'I' come to do 'Your' will, O God, then that's what it says, not "'I' come to do 'My' will, O 'Me'". Words have meanings and we shouldn't ignore them in favor of our doctrines and theology. "Oh, that was just His 'humanity' speaking to his 'divinity'"..... No; how about He was a real, live human being, on earth, speaking to God His Father in heaven? "Jehovah (My Father) is My ('My' being Jesus the man, the Son of God, the Lamb) Shepherd; I (Jesus a human here on earth) shall not want...." etc. Gosh, a real man. What a shocking notion. At the core of the gospels, there was a real man named Jesus. What a revelation.
__________________
"Freedom is free. It's slavery that's so horribly expensive" - Colonel Templeton, ret., of the 12th Scottish Highlanders, the 'Black Fusiliers' |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|