Is The Bible Inerrant?

[ZNPaaneah]

Originally Posted by james73

See, I think this gets to the root of the problem - in fact, Copernicus didn't disprove anything, he simply proposed a new theory based on new observational data.

No that is not accurate. He had much more accurate and detailed observations, true, but these observations were clearly contrary to the geocentric model of the day. You could argue that he didn't prove that the heliocentric model was true, the observations only presented that as the simplest explanation. But his observations most definitely disproved the geocentric model that was accepted at that day.

My point is simple, proving that the Bible is inerrant is probably not something that can be done with one observation, or two, or even a thousand.

However, a single observation of an error made by the Bible would disprove the theory. As a result I was led to believe that Awareness was going to provide us with this error. The job for Awareness is infinitely easier. Now even if the Bible was written by one author it should have errors. Since it was written by numerous authors over many years the errors should be simple to find. But I am still waiting for Awareness to respond to any of my posts.

[awareness]

Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah

But I am still waiting for Awareness to respond to any of my posts.

Yes bro ZNP it appears that I'm diss'ing you. Sorry. I promise to remedy that. I just got a little discombobulated by Untohim.

But I feel to express that I, for one, like your lists and summaries. I think you are gifted at it. So kudos bro.