Local Church Discussions  

Go Back   Local Church Discussions > Writings of Former Members > Writings and Concerns of Steve Isitt

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-03-2012, 09:24 AM   #22
TLFisher
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Renton, Washington
Posts: 3,562
Default Re: Sisters of the Rebellion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Why don't they believe it was justified or proper? Please notice they never explain why they believe what they believe.
Ohio probably explained it best once you get to the bottom. As for the letter, it was political.
Here's my take on it. If you have read Speaking the Truth in Love, John Ingalls got into the awkwardness of dealing with Philip Lee. Here was an immoral man who managed LSM's business in Anaheim, but he did not meet with the Church in Anaheim. Was this a local matter or an extra-local matter? Then the games begin when John Ingalls and Ken Unger go to Texas I believe to meet with Benson Phillips and Ray Graver. They were offended of being involved thinking it's a local matter and not an extra-local matter. How can it be a local matter, when you have someone not meeting locally, but has his hands in localities' business throughout the world? Eventually the Anaheim elders do take action and by those that met in Anheim probably feel it was 10 years overdue.
The other hand of playing games probably came to fruition in 1993. How can the elders discipline the LSM General manager who doesn't meet with the Church in Anaheim. It's not a local matter, it's an extra-local matter.
Understand how the game is played? The situation changes like sinking sand when it benefits the ministry.
TLFisher is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:57 PM.


3.8.9