Regarding the Ground of Locality - David Canfield

[Cal]

Originally Posted by aron

I really don't see any mature and thoughtful believer taking this path. It is only going to convince the simple and unschooled, who are easily blown about by various winds of teaching.

p.s. all of us do mental gymnastics, and interpret partly in truth and partly in error. Such is the benefit of the assembly: of critical examination by others, of "...in many counselors there is safety" (Prov 11:14). I am just kind of peeved that David Canfield thinks Nee's interpretation is "the way of the Lord" while everyone else is "going his own way". How can anyone have a conversation with such ideas?

I don't doubt Canfield really believes the stuff he says. But the root of his problem is esteeming "oneness" too highly. "Oneness" has become an idol to the the LRC, much like speaking in tongues became an idol to some charismatics.

And because they made it an idol, of course they've distorted it.