![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,384
|
![]() Quote:
So no matter how dogmatic many have wanted to be about things over the centuries, it is not "evident" that Paul made a statement that was actually universal as opposed to cultural. Then why did he say that? Because the culture into which he was speaking probably considered their cultural norms to be more a matter of the way of nature than it really was. Do you think Paul would have gained any ground telling them that their culture was just an opinion when they held it as the way it was ordained by nature? That could have been almost as bad as declaring that Caesar was not a god. Might Paul, at another time, possibly taken time to reason with those same people about how much a belief like that was not grounded in nature, but only in the established patterns of their culture? Especially if they were being confronted with new believers in their midst who were not of their culture and men had long hair. Just like he did with respect to gentiles v Jews. If long hair on a man was a shame as a matter of nature, then the earliest men were all shames because there was a time when the ability to cut hair was either limited or non-existent. It is facts like this that make broad universal claims based on one comment into a particular culture questionable, at best. But then some will find arguments that men have cut their hair since the days of Adam, just like they declare that all that wine consumed in the Bible was unfermented grape juice.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|