Became or Not Became - Interpreting 1Cor 15:45

[zeek]

Originally Posted by OBW

Not sure that I buy this argument. But it is not bad. I could surely have fellowship with someone who held it. If they believe in Christ and his work on the Cross on our behalf, it is acceptable.

But none of this puts the Trinity into the passage/discussion that includes 1 Cor 15:45. We are still responding to the guy in class who continually asks irrelevant questions and wastes the professor's time as he discusses that and leaves the topic for the day languishing. (Probably means we need a new professor. One that is not distracted from his purpose.)

Am I correct in concluding from this statement that you have dismissed Richard Gaffin Jr.'s, thesis that 15:45 is about the Holy Spirit and if so why?