View Single Post
Old 07-08-2019, 08:29 PM   #17
Jo S
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 488
Default Re: Definition of "The Lordīs Recovery"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sons to Glory! View Post
When I read the originating post definition, my mind went to a similar place. I do believe that early on there was a real move of God with the LC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio View Post
When I left the LC, and found this forum, a nagging question haunted me: "How could something so good become so bad?"

StG, I assume you're referring to my post. So I'll respond and leave with this;

I see others on the board struggling with the same question that Ohio posed; "How could something so good become so bad?".

Watchman Nee's vision that gave birth to this movement through the doctrine or ground of locality, in my view, wasn't based on God's truth.

If it's true that the sole identity of the Lord's Recovery was founded upon and rooted in a lie, how could this movement ever be considered to have been something good?

But if you maintain your position that the Lord's Recovery was good in the beginning, you would have to agree with Nee's vision. And since God doesn't lie or contradict His Word, in order for the LC's to have been a genuine move of the Holy Spirit, God too would have had to agree that all Christians need to gather in one location within every city under one minister. Yet what I see in God's revelation is Jesus Christ gathering his entire church into only one city, the New Jerusalem.

You just can't have it both ways.
Jo S is offline   Reply With Quote