Quote:
Originally Posted by zeek
The Bible never explicitly states that it is an historical record. That it is is a matter of Christian tradition.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by awareness
If the word of God doesn't say it means that it's not historical. So to say it's a historical record is extra-Biblical tradition.
|
That's *
conveniently* an absurd standard to place on the Bible.
Genesis 2.4, for example, says, "
These are the generations of the heaven and the earth when they were created."
Obviously an "historical" record, but you guys apparently read about this so-called "disclaimer" by some university moron ... err scholar like Ehrman ... and believed this nonsense.
Luke himself precedes two books with statements like, "
draw up a narrative concerning these matters," but it's not "history" because he didn't use the right words.
Seriously?
So when the Bible repeatedly instructs us that "these things were recorded," it is not actually an "historical record" because it did not use the words "historical record."
Are you guys really doubling down on dumb? You guys are better than this! Have you actually gone off the deep end with this PC talk? The LC was also this way -- i.e. you can't be a "real" church unless you call yourself "THE church IN anytown."