Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassidy
Yes, but you were implying that the Lord would not use a select "few" and we have biblical examples of where He does just that. My point is that you have to allow for that and not reject God's arrangement of speaking through a "few".
I am not sure what the problem you are having about the book of James. You seem to suggest that just because something is in the Bible that it is God's word. Was Peter's objection to the Lord Jesus going to the cross God's word? Was Satan's "Hath God said?" God's words? Was the council of Job's friends God's words?
No, of course they were not.
|
There was no implication. There is a context here on this thread that when we say "the feeling of the Body" we are referring to how this is used in the LRC and by the Blendeds. I am one of the very few who has tried to draw a distinction between "the oneness of the Body" and other expressions like "the feeling of the Body" or "Keeping the oneness of the Body". But within the context of how this expression is used it bears no relation to how God actually speaks through people. On the contrary it is much closer akin to how the Catholics choose a Pope. The feeling of the Body is the consensus of the "cardinals", i.e. blendeds.
The problem I am having with the book of James is that this is one of the 66 books of the Bible. It is a divine revelation and a wonderful book at protecting saints from being deceived by the likes of WL, etal. The disrespect shown this book by WL is an expression of his pride and arrogance. The fact that so many in the LRC line up behind this farce even though they pretend to base their faith on the Bible is one of many hypocrisies in the LRC. They claim they are rich and know not that they are blind, and miserable and poor.