12-27-2014, 04:16 PM | #501 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
People in the Recovery have often been told that they should just "forget about their problems" and "turn to their spirit." I think we all know how much damage that has caused over the years.
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
12-27-2014, 10:47 PM | #502 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||
12-28-2014, 09:59 AM | #503 | |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
In relation to your reaction to my comment about "seeing the Truth of the Gospel", I think you may be selling the Gospel a little short. (no worries, we all do!) You see the biblical Gospel addresses much, much more than just "saving us from our sins", it actually addresses the many effects of The Fall, of which mental/psychological problems are one of the major effects. The apostle Paul described one of the effects of The Fall as subjugating Man to "The law of sin and death"(Rom 8:2), and the Gospel addresses this "law" with another "law" - "The law of the Spirit of life". (Rom 8:2) There is no doubt that we are still suffering to one degree or another from the effects of the first law, but to the extent that we believe and grow in "the faith of the Gospel"(Phil 1:27) we will begin to experience the effects of the law of the Spirit of life, and this surely includes the healing of our mind. So I strongly believe, and it is my experience, that the answers for those suffering from the negative effects of false religion is to point them towards the genuine article - the faith of the Gospel as related in the living and abiding Word of God. This was one of my main considerations in setting up this forum, and it remains as one of the foundational principles today.
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|
12-28-2014, 10:35 AM | #504 | |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Oh it's not Truth or God that I'm worried about, its our dear brothers and sisters in the Local Church.
Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|
12-28-2014, 10:46 AM | #505 | |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
In regards to not cross posting from one forum to another, this is just plain common sense and part of Internet forum netiquette. Of course due to the nature of the discussions here it makes this even more important.
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|
12-28-2014, 12:50 PM | #506 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I would like to see a more robust defense of Christian fundamentalism here, and it doesn't look like that will happen unless others are allowed in.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
12-28-2014, 12:51 PM | #507 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
There are many people in the Recovery who feel like they "know too much." There are many people in the Recovery who will occasionally whisper "sideways" comments about yellow chairs, tennis rackets, World's Fairs, and John Ingalls. These things are not quite as hidden as we might like to believe. Yet there remains this air of secrecy. Sometimes the biggest help is for others just to pull back the curtain a little. To hear some kid shout, "What the heck, the emperor's not wearing any clothes!?" Outsiders are ill-equipped to do this. (If you've never been in the Recovery, it's quite challenging to "connect the Recovery dots.") The people in the best position to do this are those of us who have experienced the nonsense firsthand, in all its particulars.
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
12-28-2014, 12:54 PM | #508 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I'm mostly glad it's password protected, so that others don't have to see our bickering. LSM loves this stuff, and they don't need to see it. (That's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.)
"While sheep bicker, wolves will play."
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
12-28-2014, 04:06 PM | #509 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Ah, I see. But, if we discuss issues like grown-ups, it doesn't have to be bickering. We all might learn something. We might each come to a better understanding of the issues and acceptance of one another as we really are instead of a false show of unity. The Leecal Church suppressed free thought and presented the false face of conformity to the world. Why be concerned about what LSM thinks? I haven't made decisions based on what they love or hate since I left, I'm not going to start now.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
12-28-2014, 07:18 PM | #510 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
It's indefensible because it is all a matter of faith. Not much of it makes rational sense. The trinity, virgin birth, Christ's divinity, death, resurrection, and ascension etc are just divine mysteries for the Christian faith. However, does the Bible support all of these divine mysteries? That is where there has been a lack of defense of these matters. It seems like all we receive here is a regurgitation of the same ole stuff without thoughtful responses. It is what it is. It is hard to get off the dime of superficial issues from the LC.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
12-28-2014, 07:30 PM | #511 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I guess if we just all agree with each other then that makes a good conversation and people won't see disagreements. If you think about it, isn't that what happened in the LC? In fact, they attempted to suppress disagreements or questioning to the point of filing lawsuits, excommunicating members etc. Isn't that what is being done when our discussions are labeled as "bickering" and thus placing a negative label on legitimate questions? If we disagree we are "bickering". ...interesting perspective. My take on this is that people evolving out of the LC need to see that we can question each other and carry on adult conversations without suppression, even subtle suppression such as labeling discussions as "bickering".
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
12-28-2014, 07:51 PM | #512 | |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|
12-28-2014, 08:22 PM | #513 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Most if not all the NT historians you are reading bring naturalistic assumptions to their analysis of the Bible. So, for example, a historian might say that the Gospel of John must have been written after the execution of Peter, because, in that Gospel, Jesus is represented as predicts the execution of Peter. The historian assumes that a book cannot be written before events which it refers to. Why? Because prophesies of the future don't really happen. Of course, if real prophesies do occur then this argument for the date of the Gospel of John falls apart. She takes it for granted that they don't. She may be right, but she didn't discover this principle by historical inquiry. She brought her disbelief in the reality of prophesy to her historical work as an assumption. Unless she had, her historical conclusion about the date of the Gospel could not have been reached at all on the basis of Jesus' prediction about Peter. If the question whether or not prophesies are real, the historian's conclusion is of no help. It begs the question. The historian bases her conclusion on a negative presupposition. And more often than not, the historian won't make the grounds for the assumption explicit. A parallel assumption happens on the supernaturalist side. It is assumed that miracles can happen. Hence, the impasse that we find ourselves in. And, of course, on the other forums of this website site, philosophical analysis of assumptions is sacrosanct, so it's impossible to make the assumptions explicit without offending the moderator or others. Or, at least it has been in the past. That's why I started this thread in this forum; so that, we could discuss rationally how we get to these impasses and hopefully come to a better understanding of our respective positions. How are we doing?
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
12-29-2014, 05:51 AM | #514 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
12-29-2014, 05:54 AM | #515 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
My sentiments exactly!
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
12-29-2014, 06:09 AM | #516 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
No, they see: "Alternative Views - PassWord Protected - Request PassWord from UntoHim."
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The problem with that is that it presupposes that there's only one right way to come out of the local church. And we know that's just not true. But given that there may be some that have come out of the local church, that have legitimate concerns about speaking publicly, I have mixed feelings about Alternative Views. They may find a safe place to express themselves. However, if they don't come to AV, then it's just us few that are enjoying AV, which seems like all we'll end up with is talking to ourselves, that have few disagreements (other than bickering) That's not all bad, but good discussions require heartfelt disagreements. And yes, I would love it if some great thinking fundamentalists, or perchance very devoted ones, came out in defense of fundamentalism. One reason I'm here is to learn. Therefore I welcome the challenge of disagreements. Will that happen on AV? Time will tell.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|||
12-29-2014, 06:20 AM | #517 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Are you calling me a wolf?
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
12-30-2014, 02:32 AM | #518 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I'm all for vigorous discussion and debate. I was referring to the discussion re Alt Views, passwords, etc. That's all I was referring to as "bickering." It just struck me as a discussion that could occur offline. Peace.
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
12-30-2014, 03:34 AM | #519 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
The very purpose of fundamentalism was to put an end to discussion and debate. Like the creeds, it was saying, "these are the basics and we're no longer debating these matters."
Quote:
Fundy was a reaction to science seeing the way things are, not the way superstition saw/sees it. Like science it is a matter of seeing. And zeek's concern is that very few see what's going on on Alt Views.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
12-30-2014, 01:44 PM | #520 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
12-30-2014, 05:50 PM | #521 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
12-31-2014, 03:27 AM | #522 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-03-2015, 05:29 AM | #523 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
One question that has been gnawing at me over the last few months as I have read all of the discussions on this forum is who are the real Christians? We have listed "beliefs" of fundamentalists and discussed fundamentalism but who are the real Christians? I think there are several parts to this question. However, this does not assume that everyone has had the Christian born-again experience. The real Christians are:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
01-03-2015, 01:57 PM | #524 | |||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Your "questions" remind me a lot of what the apostle Paul wrote to the Romans, except that that he was answering the question "Who are the real Jews?" Quote:
Quote:
I'm sure you're familiar with the quote from Ghandi "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." What Ghandi was reacting to, I'm quite certain, was seeing the actions and attitudes of of a people who held to a certain religious belief but never had a true revelation of Christ. But the thing is, and there is no way around this, Christ never asked us to like him, he asked firstly for us to believe into him and what he said about himself and his Father. Only later does he say "pick up your cross and follow me". Your questions, my friend Dave, reflect your observation of the great majority of "Christians" who are spiritually unable to fulfill what the apostle Paul called "to live is Christ". They are impotent for many reasons - too many to get into right here - but it all comes down to the abject fact that many have not had a genuine spiritual regeneration. They have had the physical "circumcision" (so to speak), but they have not had the circumcision which "is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter". Anyone who has not had a genuine spiritual regeneration, actually and truly born again, IN MY OPINION, is really not a Christian at all. They may be very religious and even do everything "by the letter", and follow the teachings of Jesus Christ and the apostles, but they have not become a son of God. They may still need to have the spiritual epiphany of "You are the Christ! The Son of the living God!". But hey, this is America and anybody can call themselves anything they want, including "Christian".
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|||
01-03-2015, 07:25 PM | #525 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
If I determined what a Christian is by everyone that calls themselves one, I'd never be able to define what or who a Christian is. Neither would I want to call myself a Christian based upon some that go by that name. Ted Haggard, Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Bakker, Jerry Falwell, and Pat Robertson, come to mind. Watchman Nee and Witness Lee also. I don't want to be associated with them. If they are Christians then I'm not. Even if -- and perhaps especially so -- "the Father has revealed it to me." UntoHim makes an undeniable point. In a nutshell, only God knows who are the real Christians. It takes God to make 'em. It requires a revealing from the Father. For example, for all I know, all those I listed above may be real Christians. And UntoHim, after all he wrote in his grand Christian sounding post, may not be. I don't even know about myself. I'd hate for what it is to be a real Christian to be define by me. Maybe there's only one that lives up to the name ... and all of us fail to be the or a model of what a real Christian is. Ultimately, honestly, I can't answer Daves' question.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
||
01-03-2015, 09:05 PM | #526 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
"I bid all men know that of my own free will I die for God, unless ye should hinder me... Let me be given to the wild beasts, for through them I can attain unto God. I am God's wheat, and I am ground by the wild beasts that I may be found the pure bread of Christ. Entice the wild beasts that they may become my sepulchre...; come fire and cross and grapplings with wild beasts, wrenching of bones, hacking of limbs, crushings of my whole body; only be it mine to attain unto Jesus Christ" Polycarp, Justin and others were also martyred. Interestingly, however, they were not martyred because they were Christians since being a Christian was not illegal but for other reasons (they wouldn't worship the state gods). We know that Nero persecuted them but that was localized and he used them as scapegoats for the burning of Rome. It should be noted that Jews were not persecuted because they would not worship the state gods mainly because they were considered a religion of antiquity. Christianity was just an upstart religion. Of course, Ignatius thought he was being martyred because of his faith and maybe that is sufficient or maybe he just got carried away. My point is, is this the real Christian or just having the attitude of an Ignatius? I agree that it should require revelation and a genuine transformation but most on this forum claim that they have experienced regeneration so are we left with some ambiguity? In other words, most if not all on this forum claim that they are Christians who have had a regenerative experience with Christ...So they have had the revelation but when we look at Albert Schweitzer compared to Ignatius or others the questions remain especially as we ask the questions of 1-7 or do we just say "only God knows". I am fairly confident how I view a real Christian and it may contrast with your perceptions of a real Christian. It appears based on the first quote above that you would not agree that it doesn't matter what your "fundamentalist" beliefs are but it is the way you live your life that counts even if you originally had a regenerative experience. Or do you get around that by saying if you are not living by fundamentalist or Evangelical beliefs now you really weren't regenerated to begin with which is the way some Baptists view it? Thanks for responding!
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-04-2015, 06:18 AM | #527 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
In the HBO documentary "Questioning Darwin" I was struck by interviews with fundamentalist Christians that were schooling very young children about the early Christian martyrs. They were using the early Christian martyrs to indoctrinated these young ones that as they grow up they can expect to be persecuted, ridiculed, and mocked, for their belief in the Bible and creationism. By such indoctrination they were essentially locking these children into a intellectual prison. This revealed to me that by using the example of the early Christian martyrs, these fundamentalist creationist Christians are a cult. And their Holy of Holies today is right here in Kentucky, at the Creation Museum.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-04-2015, 05:18 PM | #528 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Interesting about Ignatius when he said, "Entice the wild beasts..." He is asking the church members to help him become eaten alive. This is all R rated stuff or worse. I find it interesting that Paul, Polycarp, Ignatius and others write these letters while they are in prison or being transported to Rome for their martyrdom which gives the letters more import. Are these the real Christians whose lives we should follow? These are definitely the "hot" Christians and not the lukewarm ones who will be spewed out of the mouth of Christ.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-05-2015, 12:03 PM | #529 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And for me, one of the problems with the whole "born again" thinking is that over the past 100 – 200 years being born again has been distilled down to a decision made at some kind of real or created point of crisis to make a prayer or statement about belief in Christ. But since that is so strongly held as a central tenet of fundamental belief, then there is a problem when the understanding is that "whosoever believes," not "whosoever believed" has eternal life. "We" as evangelical/fundamentalists so often see salvation as this event that happened, past tense, when the only thing that is currently understood as truly past tense is the death and resurrection of Jesus. And to throw a monkey wrench into much of the standard evangelical/fundamental thinking on this subject, what if someone never has such a crisis moment during which a line of demarcation between their own personal understanding of "not saved" and "saved" is crossed? Say someone who is brought up in and older, non-evangelical tradition that teaches belief and obedience together as the path of the Christian? Do we declare that those who believe in Jesus within that system cannot be "saved" because they cannot separate their belief from their obedience (and therefore works)? Is belief in Jesus null and void if you don't clearly understand that the one thing that made you "saved" was only by your faith and not the works? Does the fact that there were works even before you clearly believed deny you the gift of God's grace? Therefore, the question is, if you don't realize that your works were not involved in your becoming "born again" is your faith and belief in Jesus nullified? If the answer to the above question is "no" then I propose that most of the categories of people on the list I quoted may be Christian, yet may not be Christian. The real thing is that being a Christian is about belief — not just claimed intellectual assent to facts, but living in a manner that it is evident that you believe. This does not dictate any specific mix of actions, works, worship, affiliation, etc., to be a Christian. But certain of those are things that we so often look at when we are trying to determine whether we think someone else is a Christian. Yet, while not entirely definitive, it would seem that claiming to believe should be among the more prominent things we rely on because that is an affirmation. And claiming to believe is not synonymous with claiming to have undertaken any kind of evangelical "decision for Christ." On the other hand, James very prominently stated that faith without works isn't really faith. But then what are the right works. And how much continued human error is a detractor from whatever the real works are? Or said differently, now much lack of visible evidence of faith is evidence of no faith? Even James did not state that those he was chastising had no faith. But instead he said their faith was dead. So if I must believe to be saved, and my belief/faith is dead, do I believe? That is the real question. And the one that the Evangelicals (of which I am a part) and Fundamentalists typically do not ask. And the one that brings the whole "line-in-the-sand" demarcation into question.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-08-2015, 09:37 AM | #530 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But what is belief? Let me use an example. In Genesis we know that God created Adam and then Eve was created out of the rib of Adam. In Genesis 3 the serpent enters the picture. We also know that God spoke to Adam and Eve. The serpent spoke to Eve in Chapter 3. Christians believe that the OT and NT are literally the spoken word of God. Okay, then do we assume that both God, Adam, Eve and the Serpent spoke fluent Hebrew? In other words, God created Adam and Adam immediately was fully fluent in the Hebrew language and had all of his faculties understanding what just happened. Eve was formed out of the rib of Adam and boom she was fully cogent of the Hebrew language and was fully cognizant of what just happened. Obviously the serpent knew that they spoke Hebrew so he spoke to Eve in Hebrew. In order for God to speak to his creations he had to speak Hebrew. It wasn't until Genesis 11 with the Tower of Babel that other languages were developed. Thus, the history of the development of language. There is a term for this: Edenics. In other words you have to believe this story or some semblance of it to be a Christian according to the Evangelicals. But what if you say it is just folklore and don't believe it is literally true. Are you still a real Christian?
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-08-2015, 02:49 PM | #531 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But the most important thing is whether any of this is reason to dismiss God or the Bible? Those earliest portions were written in whatever kind of Hebrew was around at the time of Moses since he is the original historian. Got translated over time, eventually into Greek. I would say that the stories are true in figure, and possibly true in detail. But what I think about them is not the key to salvation. If I believe that the one true God sent his son to earth and his name was Jesus, then that is the thing required. In the OT, we learn about God shepherding his people through difficult times in an era in which wars of serious casualty was the way of life in a fallen world. But in the gospels we are introduced to the way of God in a more complete way. Love God, love your neighbor, and live righteously. And believe in the Son of God for the forgiveness of your sins. Just one possible version of the history that would fit within the miniscule amount of vague verbiage provided in the early chapters of Genesis.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-09-2015, 10:17 AM | #532 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
So far I haven't been crazy enough to actually go to the Creation Museum. I'm just following it and keeping up with its development. The Commonwealth is now funding their next attraction: The Ark Encounter. I got the picture of riding a dinosaur by googling images for the Creation Museum. They do teach that man and dinosaurs lived together, and have pictures of humans riding them. You can even get your picture taken riding a dinosaur.
I think Mike's point of "creativity" applies here. Quote:
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-09-2015, 12:05 PM | #533 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
What about the mystery of Matt 27:51-53, "And behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth shook and the rocks were split. 52The tombs were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; 53and coming out of the tombs after His resurrection they entered the holy city and appeared to many.…" Whatever happened to all those people who were raised out of their tombs and entered the city---a mystery. My story is simple---I accepted Jesus as my personal savior back in August 1964 and then I believed everything that Christians around me told me to believe to include all the mysteries I have listed above. I never questioned a thing. I went to Bible College shortly thereafter for about 3 years until I ran into Karl Hammond who introduced me to the local church Santa Cruz. I had never questioned the Bible since it was the Word of God. Like all of us I became very active in the LC but after two migrations I wondered what is going on around here. I remember thinking at one point in a meeting, do I really want to raise my chldren in this environment? I left the LC, started attending another church AOG but after awhile just didn't feel comfortable in it or couldn't get into it even though the Pastor had me teaching adult Sunday School. I tried a couple other churches but they didn't work for me. Let's face it --- not a lot of it makes sense but people believe it on faith and give up on trying to figure it out. However, people also rationalize it or try to explain the contradictions away. It's true, if you have faith you don't need to understand any of it. When you look at this country which started democracy with the Pilgrims and the Mayflower Compact promoting religious freedom as they fled from England and the Anglican church think about how many Native Americans were killed, how many slaves we brought over here in the name of Christianity etc. Once the Christians had the upper hand they were making martyrs of everyone else. Of course, many "Christians" were martyred during the middle ages by the RCC with the Inquisition who were also the Christians of the day. Fortunately today we do have the freedom to speak our own opinions without being persecuted...even if we don't fit into the square peg of fundamental Christianity.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-09-2015, 02:32 PM | #534 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
What's funny about this whole thread is that there is a significant part of Evangelicalism that goes to great lengths to separate themselves from the modern Christian fundamentalists. And at some level, I believe rightly so. They like to think of themselves as nice fundamentalists (they believe in the fundamentals without the finger-pointing and wall building that seems to go on within fundamentalism).
The problem is that there are foam-at-the-mouth fundamentalists imbedded within the Evangelicals, so it is hard for many of them to actually make the claim. They want to. And try to. But there are too many ready to change churches over a 6-day creation, picket every business that hires gays, and fight to bring American back to God and its rightful place being blessed by God (as they speed down the highway with their radar detector . . . gag me with a spoon — please!).
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
01-09-2015, 03:11 PM | #535 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Where is Jesus in all of this? Where are the Evangelicals in trying to make this a better world? Jesus has left the country. The problem is that Evangelicals apparently think --- read your Bible, pray and shout Hallelujah and the rest will take care of itself. It doesn't mean they don't give money but consider someone like Bill Gates who gives away billions to help the world's most poverty stricken countries fight disease and poverty. He doesn't do it as a Christian but as a humanitarian. Again, what would Jesus do? Would he even visit any of the Evangelical churches?
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-09-2015, 04:02 PM | #536 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 620
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture which I believe is so deep now that there's probably not much anyone can do about it. Ironically what led me to Jesus after being a lukewarm Christian most of my life started with investigating blatant fraud in the metals market and why it was never addressed that led me down a huge rabbit hole... http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...0130425?page=2 There's an oligarchy running everything while the American public is asleep listening to Katy Perry or watching American Idol. The best we can do is as Jesus said is to be the salt of the earth. The world is moving towards a certain direction, all we can do is to slow it down by loving our neighbor including the poor and downtrodden and giving people the only true hope which is in Jesus Christ, our hope of glory.
__________________
1 John 4:9 This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. |
|
01-09-2015, 04:51 PM | #537 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-09-2015, 05:25 PM | #538 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-09-2015, 05:30 PM | #539 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And as for the Lord's Recovery, it is a minority that live in the US. It is a minority that live in the Western Hemisphere. Do we really believe that self-described "evangelicalism" or "fundamentalism" is the destination for most departed Lord's Recovery members? What makes people so certain about the correct path to take?
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-09-2015, 05:32 PM | #540 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-09-2015, 05:51 PM | #541 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
This is primarily a Christian country and always has been. These are not generalizations. They are all realities--we do have the most crimes, violent crimes in the developed countries per capita. We do have the most individuals in prison per capita. I am not making this up. Our health care system sucks when it comes to the poor compared to other developed nations per capita. I don't care if we are 300 million or 20 million we stand out like a sore thumb. We are the only developed nation that has capital punishment, we scarcely have any significant gun laws compared to the other developed nations....I don't need to make this up...check it out.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
01-10-2015, 12:55 AM | #542 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I'm not a Christian myself, but I'll be the first to acknowledge that a Christian church has the potential to foster peace and good will in a community. In any event, there are plenty of Americans who wish that America were more like Europe. That's fine. But maybe all these statistics comparing the US w/the so-called "developed world" are mostly about saying, "Why aren't we more like Europe?" (Maybe cuz...we're not Europe? I don't know...) Lumping together the populations of the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the European Union (and including Norway + Switzerland which are not part of the EU), we have a total of ~900 million people. If we include Russia (which you're probably not including as a "developed nation"?), that brings us between 1.0-1.1 billion people. Either way, this construct of "developed nations" apparently includes 15% or less of the world's 7 billion people. The US has a frontier tradition and gun laws which have certainly resulted in high violent crime in the present day. As for healthcare, I have a funny feeling that there are some poor Gypsies and poor Algerian immigrants, in various places in Europe, who might (just might) not get the best healthcare in the world. But...I could be wrong...
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-10-2015, 07:15 AM | #543 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I have seen first hand the change in our economy when people who were middle class lost their jobs and were in lines for food for the homeless with their kids or came to the Food Pantry for food. We have to start with our local community. I have spoken to many people who don't have health insurance and have to use the emergency room every time they have a health problem. I am sure this is going on where you are located. To me it is not statistics, it's personal and fundamentalist Christians if they were living their faith should be at the forefront of taking care of the downtrodden, poor, the sick etc and unfortunately from what I see they are not. They even vote against aid to those in dire straits. My cousin who is a fundamentalist said to me, "the poor you have with you always' but God said we should gather wealth and that is very typical of the fundamentalists I have met. Don't get me wrong there are some who have a love for people but they are more the exception. You can probably listen to any mega-church fundamentalist Minister on Sunday on TV and they won't be talking about caring for the needy. They will be quoting the Bible but not Gal. 2:10. Fundamentalist Christians are the most likely to belong to the NRA especially in the South, against universal healthcare, against funding the poor, etc. This is their legacy.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-10-2015, 09:47 AM | #544 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
01-11-2015, 12:35 AM | #545 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
OK, so...living in Italy is not ideal. Living in Paris is, apparently, not ideal. Where exactly is this magical other "developed" world you're comparing the United States to?
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
01-11-2015, 12:57 AM | #546 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
In any event, I think these issues tend to be very complex. Believing that a federalized healthcare program is a poor policy decision may just be an excuse for not wanting to help anybody. Or, it may be an informed opinion that takes into account a variety of factors, economic and social, that push and pull against each other.
It's great that you help in a food pantry and community garden in a well-to-do area near a beach. I believe this kind of local involvement can be quite rewarding. But it doesn't really have that much to do with how one votes (or, wishes they could vote) in regards to macrogovernmental policy.
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
01-11-2015, 03:35 AM | #547 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Just like Toto pulling open the curtain on the wise ole wizard ... Liberals are always hatin' on christians and the usa ... Claiming to be looking for a better place ... Only found on the flat screen ..
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
01-11-2015, 12:03 PM | #548 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
As I noted earlier I had a physical problem develop when I was in Cuba and went to the emergency room in Baracoa which is a small seaside city. Their facilities weren't perfect but they had several doctors to include specialists who checked me out and their care was great. No cost. Try that in the US. You may not know this but Cuba has sent many of their well trained doctors to Venezuela to help them out with a shortage of doctors.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-11-2015, 12:18 PM | #549 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
18 Trillion in debt? That makes us the richest?
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
01-11-2015, 02:39 PM | #550 | |||
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
There's plenty to go around.
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|||
01-11-2015, 03:45 PM | #551 | ||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Let's look at Norway which is ranked higher (4th) per capita than the US (we are currently 6th but most of the countries higher are much smaller (Luxemberg), financial districts (Singapore), Arab countries (Qatar), or a country like Norway with considerable resources (in any case considering our size we are the runaway winner for wealth): What is life like in a truly liberal capitalist country such as Norway? It is better than life in the USA. Let’s take a look at a key economic statistic.
Per capita income: USA = $50,789, Norway = $58,645 Taxes as a percentage of GDP: USA = 25% Norway = 41% The Norwegian tax system is more “progressive” than the system in the USA: Poor people pay much less; Wealthy people (and corporations) pay much more — with fewer tax loop-holes and government subsidies. And what do Norwegians get for their higher taxes? Extensive cradle-to-grave social services: health care, education, child day care, libraries, recreation and arts facilities — plus an extensive public transportation system. These are free or are offered at low cost, subsidized by taxes. For eight years Norway has had the United Nations’ #1 ranking in “Quality of Life,” which is based on a number of factors such as income, life expectancy, college graduation rates, etc. As a result of lower taxes and higher levels of social services, there are far fewer truly “poor” people in Norway than in the USA. The fundamental argument for making Norway's economy even more conservative is that “we will all be better off if the forces of unregulated free-market capitalism are allowed to prevail.” Norway proves this is not true (as do most of the other nations of Western Europe, by the way.) Quote:
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
||
01-11-2015, 03:49 PM | #552 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Turned into a real pissing contest this. Nice.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-11-2015, 05:29 PM | #553 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Pissing contests are not unique to humans. Trevor Corson's The Secret Life of Lobsters describes a pissing match between lobsters:
The American lobster urinates not from some posterior region of its body, but directly out the front of its face. Two bladders inside the head hold copious amounts of urine, which the lobster squirts through a pair of muscular nozzles beneath its antennae. These powerful streams mix with the gill outflow and are carried some five feet ahead of the lobster in its plume ... What the researchers discovered during the ensuing fights was that dueling lobsters accompanied their most punishing blows during combat by intense squirts of piss at the opponent's face. What was more, in scenes akin to a showdown at the OK Corral, the winner of the physical combat almost always turned out to be the lobster that had urinated first. And well after the fight was over, the winner kept pissing. By contrast, the loser shuts off his urine valves immediately.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
01-11-2015, 05:32 PM | #554 |
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 620
|
Re: Fundamentalism
There are also examples of places where non-socialist, conservative capitalism has succeeded such as Hong Kong and Switzerland. Norway is exceptional because of its abundant oil resources which have been nationalized for the benefit of all and it's excellent public education system. One trait all these countries share is low corruption and access to quality education for everyone.
The US on the other hand has growing inequality and unequal access to education. Income inequality used to be low between blacks and whites but the war on drugs unfairly targeted black families even though whites and blacks used drugs at the same rate. So we had generations of blacks who grew up in homes with no dad (who was in jail) and thus poorer and less educated leading to a vicious cycle of ghettofication of black neighborhoods. The gap is being made worse by the federal reserve's money printing/quantitative easing policies which is giving too big to fail banks cash in exchange for mortgage backed securities. Banks in turn invest the cash into risky derivatives and stocks, thereby inflating stocks and commodities making things more expensive for the average joe, while making the rich who own stocks and real estate richer all the while wages stay the same. Repeal of laws such as Glass-Steagall (dismantled by both parties) and the fact that no one except Madoff was punished for the 2008 crash will make the next crash perhaps the last one. To big to fail banks such as JP Morgan are still investing depositor money in risky derivatives to a much greater extent than in 2008 and nothing is being done about it. Neither Democrats or Republicans are addressing these real issues because they are owned by the same people who determine the harmless talking points and irrelevant issues for the parties to disagree on and debate about in msnbc and fox news. Both parties worked to pass horrific legislation such as NDAA (suspension of habeus corpus, and the govt now can detain you indefinitely without due process) and the so-called Patriot Act. The Nobel peace prize winner Obama killed American citizens including a teenager with drones without any due process or trial yet no one from either party confronted him about this (not that I have anything against the president, because he is most likely a puppet, http://mondoweiss.net/2013/06/renege...ssive-promises). The fact that private banks own the federal reserve and can print money to serve their own interests without any accountability is also never addressed. ".... Despite these warnings, Woodrow Wilson signed the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. A few years later he wrote: I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -Woodrow Wilson More warnings from past presidents here: https://deusnexus.wordpress.com/2013...esidents-warn/
__________________
1 John 4:9 This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. |
01-11-2015, 06:34 PM | #555 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Silly me, when I started this thread I hoped we could actually discuss the matter dispassionately. I'm finding more and more each day how little I know. Everything I have thought and experienced up to the present moment...my mind-set as it were are my prejudices. If I stay with them, hang on to them, I close myself off to experiencing the new, the novel, perhaps even something that would change my mind about everything. So, I try to keep an open mind. At the same time, my LC experience has made me hypersensitive when anyone tries to sell my a line of bull****. Anyway, I'm not trying to persuade anybody of anything. More, I present my way of seeing things and I'd like to get yours...everybody here's really and thus be enlarged a little. Sort of the opposite of what I came to feel we were doing in the LC. And the opposite of the kind of disputation I'm seeing going on here at the moment.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
01-11-2015, 06:38 PM | #556 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
We can have honest disagreements without going off the deep end into disagreeable attacks on individuals on this forum. I don't know what is going on in your life which causes you to have to be so nasty. Your statement makes absolutely no sense in response to what I said. I would like to end this "pissing contest" which you seem intent on pursuing and let's get back to discussing fundamentalism if it is possible whether or not you agree or disagree with me or others points of view. Comparing me to Lee ("like Lee", "the disease you caught from Lee") is ridiculous and inappropriate. How in the world does what you quote relate to me tooting my own horn...it doesn't compute? This is the last time I will respond to your inappropriate comments.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
01-11-2015, 06:43 PM | #557 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Okay zeek you seem to know what we should be talking about...let it rip and get us off of this crazy Ferris wheel that won't stop. We seem to have discussed most everything about fundamentalism so I am more than willing to hear more...go at it.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
01-11-2015, 07:35 PM | #558 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Oh no. Talk about whatever you like. I'm just giving my honest reaction to what I read. Doesn't everybody recognize that their politics and religion are just theirs and not the final, true and ultimate one? I mean I'm doing the best I can with what I've got and I grant that you are doing the same. Now let's talk about it. Given my way of thinking, fundamentalism doesn't seem to be a live option for me any more. I have a half dozen book on my shelf about how awful fundamentalism is. But, here on this website I'm talking to what I assume to be real human beings and I see more to them than the stereotype. There are things I associate with Christian fundamentalism and that I experienced in the LC that I cannot abide with. There are a few things that go on here that make me cringe. But, there is more to it than that here including a humanity and spirituality that I think valuable. I believe in communicating, dialogue, the dialectic really. Like I said to Ohio, I'm not trying to persuade people to my way of thinking. But, if that's what you are trying to do, go for it. It doesn't violate UntoHim's rules, at least not here in the dungeon.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-11-2015, 09:38 PM | #559 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-12-2015, 01:44 AM | #560 | ||
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I will say that Norway has a population of ~5.0 million people, <2% of the US population. It's also far less diverse than the US. So it seems like a bit of a trade-off. What if we compared Norway to Vermont? Perhaps it would be more appropriate to compare the EU as a whole to the US as a whole? Combining Vermont and Alabama tends to average things out, as would combining Norway and, say, Lithuania. Quote:
You have to understand, Dave, I grew up in an odd little group that in many ways resembles a cult. I spent a lot of time being told that the habits and characteristics of that one group were somehow completely different, and superior to, other groups. It could be called "either/or thinking." So I tend to avoid that kind of thinking nowadays. Heck, I don't even vote anymore.
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
||
01-12-2015, 08:44 AM | #561 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
01-12-2015, 09:05 AM | #562 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I have to agree with the idea that only in a free modern liberal democracy can fundamentalism be managed. I would add the word "literate" to the definition of managing fundamentalism. We can see in other countries that if the populace is illiterate it is more susceptible to radical fundamentalist ideas. That is also born out from the Middle Ages when the Enlightenment and Renaissance evolved out of that darkness. Interesting that Renaissance is translated "rebirth". I have to say that rebirth is exactly the way I feel having left the radicalism of the LC.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-12-2015, 11:10 AM | #563 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Paul Tillich became important in my transition to secular life after the Local Church when I read his Systematic Theology in three volumes. Here was a theologian with more breadth and depth than Witness Lee. Of course, I was already studying and being supervised in psychoanalysis including the works of Jung and the self psychologists like Kernberg and Kohut. After Tillich I moved away from psychology to philosophy. I discontinued practicing psychotherapy when I moved to Tallahassee in 1992. I found that without someone else to practice on philosophy makes a more fitting home for thought than psychology.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||
01-13-2015, 09:15 AM | #564 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Anyway, the way of fundamentalism is closed to me. Biblical literalism and supernaturalism seem to be untenable. I will never get involved in a group that requires me to follow anyone with unquestioning obedience again after the Local Church. Fundamentalists believe they are the only true Christians and that entails rejecting modern science, believing a lot of fantastical things and, more than ever before, a particular set of conservative political beliefs. As society becomes more complex and uncertain, fundamentalism hardens and becomes more militant. Or at least that's how it seems to me since I left the church in 1986. Does anybody see it differently?
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-13-2015, 11:51 AM | #565 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But there are some fundamentals. They just aren't sticks to beat others with, but guideposts for ourselves. And I believe that God still is in the supernatural business, although I do not see that as necessarily meaning 6-day creation, or man living with dinosaurs before the flood, etc. As I have said somewhere in the past year or so, when it comes to the origins of the universe, everyone believes in something beyond what science can provide. Even the most atheistic scientist. They just don't all believe in God, or a god. But they believe beyond their science. Even the big bang leaves you needing something to go bang. So there is faith there. I realize that statistics neither prove or deny the possibility of a genus of creature with the significantly advanced reasoning of humans. But it does make one wonder if we are left with only chance. There is just too much with respect to the mind and the rest of what we call the soul that suggests something more than evolution. Some parts of it seem irrelevant to have "evolved" because of survival of the fittest. Maybe someone can supply a better explanation on that one.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-13-2015, 11:55 AM | #566 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-13-2015, 11:59 AM | #567 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
In regards to your group it sounds a lot like the local church. What caused you to get involved in the LC?
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-13-2015, 03:24 PM | #568 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
As a humorous sidelight, I have a friend who is a genuine liberal in every sense of the word. I haven't seen her much in the past few years, but sort of keep up with things through the little that I visit my facebook page. Back during primary season, she posted that she was tempted to vote in the republican primary just to try to stem the tide of "T-baggers" getting to the November ballot. I chuckled and replied that while we were on opposite ends of the political spectrum, I had to agree with her on that one. (I'm sure that I am stepping on someone's toes by saying that.) I am not concerned whether the laws of the US allow abortions or gay marriage. I have an opinion about both in terms of God's righteousness, but it is not important whether the government is fully righteous under God's law. It is important that I live by it (as if either is going to be my problem). I am little influenced by positions on either issue when it comes to voting. My politics are about the legitimate functions of government and those are so "down there" on the list of important things (if they are on the list at all) that I just can't let them be my reason for how I vote. And every time that someone makes some political statement from the auspices of a "Christian" group, I duck and claim to not know who those people are. Doesn't matter if the statement they make is one with which I would agree. Because it is given in a manner that labels Christians as being a block in favor of it, I want to puke. It makes it so difficult to declare that Christ is about changing lives when the Christians that the world sees are about forcing change in everyone's life with or without Christ.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-13-2015, 03:44 PM | #569 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
As for who is in and who is out, while I cannot say that little matters, there is a lot that even the group I meet with stands for that I feel no need to insist upon.
Actually, A year or so ago, I was listening to a podcast done by a bunch of Dallas Theological grads and they were talking in one series about doctrinal statements. The general consensus was that a church should effectively have three different statements. One that is very general, one that is more specific that you have to at least agree that you will teach according to if you have any kind of teaching position (even in Sunday School), and one for the leadership that is much more detailed. But even that last one should not require absolute agreement on all points, but rather the agreement that you can abide by them with respect to your position with the group. A church I attended for many years did an 18 month study to decide if they were going to change their position on whether a woman could teach from the pulpit. When they came out with "yes" it was a nuanced answer. They did not declare that everyone thought it was definitively the right answer, but everyone agreed that it was acceptable to move forward with. (A kind of "it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us" kind of position rather than an absolute "you have to believe this" kind of doctrinal point.) And I know of at least one elder that did not really think it was the best answer, but could see no reason that it was an impediment to his continued participation and even continuance as an elder. When people who think that way have beliefs that are considered "fundamental," then there is hope that this politial army of Christian fundamentalists will eventually go the way of the dinosaur and the distinction as blievers in Christ will return to the only preeminence as "fundamental."
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
01-13-2015, 07:15 PM | #570 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Aristotle’s universe possessed a remarkable logical consistency throughout its complex and multifaceted structure. All motion and process in the world was explicable by his formal teleology: Every being is moved from potentiality to actuality according to an inner dynamic dictated by a specific form. No potentiality is brought into actuality unless there exists an already actual being, a being that has already realized its form: a seed must have been produced by a mature plant, as a child must have a parent. Hence the dynamism and structured development of any entity requires an external cause— a being that serves simultaneously as efficient cause (initiating the motion), formal cause (giving the entity form), and final cause (serving as goal of the entity’s development ). To account for the entire universe’s order and movement, therefore, especially for the great movement of the heavens, Aristotle posited a supreme Form— an already existing actuality, absolute in its perfection, the only form existing entirely separate from matter. Since the greatest universal motion is that of the heavens, and since that circular motion is eternal, this prime mover must also be eternal. Aristotle’s logic could be represented in the following way: (a) All motion is the result of the dynamism impelling potentiality to formal realization, (b) Since the universe as a whole is involved in motion, and since nothing moves without an impulse toward form, the universe must be moved by a supreme, universal form, (c) Since the highest form must already be perfectly realized— i.e., not in a potential state— and since matter is by definition the state of potentiality, the highest form is both entirely immaterial and without motion: hence the Unmoved Mover, the supreme perfect Being that is pure form, God. This absolute Being, here posited by logical necessity rather than religious conviction, is the first cause of the universe. Yet this Being is wholly self-absorbed, since for it to take any heed of physical nature would diminish its perfect undisturbed character and immerse it in the flux of potentialities. As perfect actuality, the Unmoved Mover is characterized by a state of eternal unhindered activity— not the struggling process (kinesis) of moving from potential to actual, but the forever enjoyable activity (energeia) made possible only in a state of complete formal realization. For the supreme Form, that activity is thought: eternal contemplation of its own being , unqualified by the change and imperfection of the physical world it ultimately motivates. Aristotle’s God is thus pure Mind, with no material component. Its activity and pleasure is simply that of eternal consciousness of itself. -Tarnas, Richard (2011-10-19). Passion of the Western Mind (Kindle Locations 1282-1288). Random House Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-13-2015, 08:20 PM | #571 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Well worming works. But it takes a persistent abiding love.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
01-13-2015, 09:33 PM | #572 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
At this point we are 2000 years out from the death of Christ. There was Jesus' gospel, then Paul's gospel, John's gospel and the Apostolic fathers gospel followed by those who established the doctrines and canon of the Christian faith. Of course, that resulted in the Catholic church followed by the reformation started by Martin Luther in the 16th century. Each time frame has played out over the last 2000 years differently. Where does the Spirit play out in all of this? There are still groups forming such as Acts 29, Youth with a Mission etc...Is the Spirit intentionally dividing Christians into various segments....? How does this all make sense to you? How is this consistent with what Paul taught or the NT for that matter. Would Paul be running a mega-church by now or what? Can't make any sense of it. How is the Spirit inspiring the Bible for these people?
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-13-2015, 11:26 PM | #573 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-14-2015, 05:31 AM | #574 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Awareness,
Your lines concerning (from) Aristotle are interesting and indicate that he considered there to be the absolute need for something, a being, already there to make anything we see happen, therefore no time of literal nothingness since there is always the previous being. But when he says the following, I find it interesting, but not necessarily an imperative. Quote:
It is a little like those who assert that a God of mercy cannot be a God that requires justice. Yet humans can even express a little of this kind of dichotomy. Why not the divine even more so?
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-14-2015, 05:41 AM | #575 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
The problem is that no matter how much we allow the Spirit to illuminate, we will also embellish with what we think on our own. Yet the Spirit continues to work with us. And while that sometimes leaves us wondering where certain groups came up with "that," I see the Spirit working in the fact that the walls that Lee declared to be high and absolute are not really so much there. Surely each feels that they are where they are because they believe it is right, or the best there is. But a growing part do not dismiss the others for failing to fall in line. It is both a curse in that we have do deal with the fallout of outsiders pointing at the diversity, yet it is also a blessing when we are seen moving beyond those distinctions in our outreach in both the gospel and in our love for neighbor. Can you point to examples that contradict this? Surely. But you cannot show that it is entirely that way.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-14-2015, 06:50 AM | #576 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Bro Dave, lift up your eyes and see. Paul started a worldwide mega-church: the church of the gentiles. Where's the Jewish church today, that made up the first Christians? Paul started a mega-church that reached into parts of the world that weren't even known in Paul's day. And the apostle Paul is now swaying elections here in America even today. All the mega-churches today are Paul's gentile churches. Not to mention the Roman Catholic Church ... the biggest mega-church ever ... Paul is behind all Christian churches in the world today. Mega-churches today pale in comparison to Paul's church; they're children of Paul.
Quote:
We're told Christianity was started by the moving of the Spirit at Pentecost. Those were the good 'ol days, that we look back on - in awe - and admire. But when Christian writings began to circulate there was a shift. The Spirit can't be conjured at will. It's easier to follow a book. So -- to me I must say - hedging UntoHim perchance --- Christianity became a cookie-cutter copy of Judaism, living by the law, The Book, with 27 books added to the Tanakh.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-14-2015, 07:16 AM | #577 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
My condolences. Seriously ... MY CONDOLENCES. You must be really screwed up. You poor kid. I call that child abuse.
I know because Southern Baptism screwed me up, and they're nowhere close to as fanatical as the LC. Much love to you bro ...
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
01-14-2015, 09:13 AM | #578 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I said elsewhere on the forum, maybe to you, that there was a point when I decided that I didn't want to raise my kids in the LC environment and eventually left. I thought it was too problematic for someone to grow up in that type of crazy environment. For all that we have to say about the LC it was directionless then (late 1970s) and it appears to be now. It seems that many people cling to it because they don't know where else to go or they feel safe in a closed environment offered by the LC.
As awareness just said, he was raised up in the Southern Baptist environment and it had a negative affect on his life. While certainly not as traumatic as the LC even these closed church environments often wreak havoc on kids growing up. Part of the problem from my perspective is wondering where one would go or what one would do if they left something that had all the answers to life in a book or in God. Being in the Unitarian environment i hear it all the time but surprisingly the RCC seems to be maybe the worst of all aside from the LC or other cult like closed environments. The guilt trip is laid on thick. This is in contrast to my wife who was raised Unitarian. In Sunday school one year they took the kids around to different churches (including Moslem, Jewish etc) for some exposure to different religious practices and religions and as they grew up they could discover their own way and make their own decisions. Unlike many kids she never had to rebel because no one was cramming religion down her throat for her to rebel against. What is important, to me anyway, is that we bridge the gaps between religions and become as much as possible inclusive rather than exclusive. This is a message from Rev. Lavanhar, senior minister of the largest Unitarian church in the United States, in Tulsa, Ok. (they have 3 different services) as he shares the pulpit with a mega-church Evangelical Minister and talks about reconciling with Evangelicals: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jPEYJjeu8o
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
01-14-2015, 11:37 AM | #579 | |||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||||
01-14-2015, 12:14 PM | #580 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
The "World Council of Churches" started in August 1948 meeting with Christians all over the world which has as its mission today, "A worldwide fellowship of churches seeking unity, a common witness and Christian service". However, it didn't do very well even though it continues and I don't know if Evangelicals continued being involved or even attended. In any case, from my standpoint the "Spirit" is a work in progress in leading people or groups anywhere. I am not saying it should be perfect. I am saying it is not perfect and more than that, it is confusing. So, what Spirit are people following? The Spirit of disunity? Let's face it, you can get together with some Christians, you find unity in the Spirit when you form your own group (sometimes) and doctrinal unity but where are you going with it. To me it seems almost like "team spirit". Think of a football team who believes in their college, work together and when they go out on the field there is a unified feeling of "team spirit". They fight together for a common goal. They feel something between each other especially when they get together. Well, then they graduate and go on their separate ways although they might keep in touch remembering that team spirit that once kept them together. Sorry about this example but its the best I can do on short notice and I know people who are true believers for their teams over the course of their lives and get together and share stories etc. They have a common interest which lasts. Anyone of them who would be against their team would be problematic and they might eschew. I just see all of these churches fighting for their beliefs and members who would agree with them.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-14-2015, 08:50 PM | #581 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 620
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
To me, Wilkerson came across as a man of God in his sermons often calling for repentance, a life of holiness and devotion to God and had done a lot to help the poor.
__________________
1 John 4:9 This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. |
|
01-15-2015, 02:34 AM | #582 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
What he did was certainly innovative and successful at the time as well as constructive and commendable. In fact his 1958 Teen Challenge lives on today helping addicts. I was so surprised to run into one a few years back that I immediately gave a donation to the organization because of my experience and the good things they do for people.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-16-2015, 08:47 AM | #583 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
While the World Council of Churches may not have ever had a complete following, nor have had the impact they desired, I note that much of the extreme rhetoric against the RCC has toned down in the past several years. More and more people are coming to realize that while there are some serious problems with certain teachings and practices, there is nothing making them "unchristian" as a group. And further, many have begun to realize that coming to faith in Christ is not exclusively through evangelism followed by a crisis time when you dramatically pray to be saved (such as through the old-fashioned altar call of certain groups). That believing in Christ is the key to obtaining the saving grace of Christ. And therefore salvation within the RCC may not be such an unexpected thing as we were previously led to believe. No, they will seldom have the outward experiences of those in a charismatic group, the LRC, or even some other evangelical group. But the experiences in these are often more tied to the nature of the group than the unique experiences of God. As for referring to "spirit" in terms of "team spirit," there is evidence that some of the references to spirit (not The Spirit) in the Bible are to something just like that. When Paul makes reference to a spirit of [something] it is not referring to the Holy Spirit or to the spirit of man, but to some kind of attitude of mind, therefore a lot like team spirit. Or to attitude. Or several other things that are not man's spirit nor the Spirit of God. No, frame of mind or of will does not make anything happen. But if our goal is to both belief and obedience, then having a frame of mind to undertake the obedient things is surely part of the process. There are some that surely fight about what they believe. But I have been part of two different congregations over the past many years that have specific beliefs, but do not hold those out as the primary thing. They are not seeking to sway everyone to their way of thinking, although if they do believe it, I would not expect them to be totally silent about it (and they are not). But their primary concern is that people come to know Christ and become connected to others who know Christ. Here or elsewhere. The "fights" that I see anything about recently have been related to practices, and to political positions (something that the church should be much less visible in). Few spoke critically of Mark Driscoll until he made some statement about voting for Obama (political) and then when there started being some evidence of church discipline that exceeded rational bounds provided in the Bible. But there was little real criticism of his basic teachings, even from people of different "traditions." There is a lot of criticism of the prosperity gospel, but seldom of the underlying denomination within which certain famous proponents of that thinking are operating. There is a lot of open criticism of that little Baptist church (in Missouri or Kansas or somewhere near there) that goes around being obnoxious at soldiers' funerals. And they deserve it. And if you read the writings of a Presbyterian, a Baptist, and an Anglican, you will see different emphases and even different opinions on certain things. But not really that much "fighting" with each other. To me that seems to be an overlay on the differences not supported by the evidence.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-16-2015, 09:09 AM | #584 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Here's a blogger who thinks Fundamentalism started out well and lost its way http://jeriwho.net/lillypad2/?p=2363 whereas I think fundamentalism's rejection of objective scientific and historical research was throwing out reality with the bathwater. Fanaticism, intellectual suicide and authoritarian leaders who take their followers on magic carpet rides seem to have been the inevitable results. My view is supported by Armstrong who I would not characterize as a skeptic since she sees value in religion and spirituality as do I:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
01-16-2015, 06:21 PM | #585 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Since no one on this website has stood up to give a robust defense of Christian Fundamentalism, let me provide a link to, if not the best one I've seen lately, at least the most colorfully embroidered one: http://thriceholy.net/fundamentals.html
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-16-2015, 09:47 PM | #586 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Or the author is missing an oar, a taco, or sufficient stops on the elevator. Or (last) they are looking for a few good suckers to populate yet one more exclusivist cult and keep some huckster employed. I'm just not sure which I should expect.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-16-2015, 10:43 PM | #587 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 620
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
http://www.newsweek.com/response-newsweek-bible-299440
__________________
1 John 4:9 This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. |
|
01-17-2015, 06:25 AM | #588 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
The first link is out to make controversy with everyone that is not on board with their particular version of how it should be. The second is demonstrably showing how even the variations are so minor as to primarily being the difference between writing "Dr." v "Doctor." And on the one that is so often brought up these days (the woman caught in adultery) the correct assertion is that almost no one believes it is not part of the Bible. It is almost universally accepted as part of the gospel accounts. The problem seems to be with where it belongs, not whether it belongs. And as a humorous aside, I note that the first link, when discussing the immaculate conception, it provided an alternate reading for the woman caught in adultery as follows: And Jesus went unto mount Olivet. And early in the morning he came again into the temple: and all the people came to him. And sitting down he taught them. And the scribes and Pharisees bring unto him a woman taken in adultery: and they set her in the midst, and said to him: Master, this woman was even now taken in adultery. Now Moses in the law commanded us to stone such a one. But what sayest thou? And this they said tempting him, that they might accuse him. But Jesus bowing himself down, wrote with his finger on the ground. When therefore they continued asking him, he lifted up himself and said to them: He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. He does not say, 'the Law of Moses is rescinded, the penalty is cancelled,' He only requires sinless stone-throwers. At this, a matron stomps forward, picks up a huge rock, and heaves it. Jesus says, "You know, Mom, you can be a real pain sometimes."
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-17-2015, 07:00 AM | #589 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
The first time anyone started writing the NT was at least a couple decades after the death of Christ and most were decades later. We only have copies of copies---no originals. Also, the first time the 27 book NT canon was listed by anyone was Athanasius in 367AD and not as Brown quoted in 223AD. In any case, there are so many problems with Brown's response that I don't want to go into any more detail at this point.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-17-2015, 11:14 AM | #590 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
01-17-2015, 11:55 AM | #591 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Ludicrous!
That's the word that comes to mind after reading zeeks link in post #585, to The Blogger, and bearbear's link in post #587, to Dr. Brown. Brown was great, by the way. At least he sounded intelligent. But his arguments seem to be coming from a predetermined position, what could be termed coming from a devotional position; or, devotion before, during, and after, coming to conclusions; the predetermined conclusion determining the final conclusion. Let's face it. Fundamentalism is squirming. In fact, it started as a squirm. And it's getting beat up way more than when the Five Fundamentals were squirmed out in the early 20th c. Now they're squirming between each other. Over who are the real fundamentalists ... and who lost their way, being compromised by the new modern liberal [educated] Christian (so called) views and thinking. And grown up as a fundamentalist, and one in the local church, it now hits my funny bone to see them squirm. Serves 'em right. I had to squirm. I know personally how it hurts to find out what you assumed to be right and true to be wrong. It hurts to be wrong, more than it hurts to be wronged. I'm amazed to meet some out here that have been in the LC for 30 and 40 yrs, and then come out and admit they were wrong all those yrs. Amen to you all for being able to do that. And I'm sorry for laughing at my fundamentalist brothers and sisters. I know it ain't easy. It had to be easier, back in the days when we could ride dinosaurs. And if that don't make you laugh then you don't have any trace of a sense of humor ... or are a fundamentalist.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
01-17-2015, 02:16 PM | #592 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-17-2015, 02:33 PM | #593 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I dismiss it for some of the same kind of reasons that Dave gave. I cannot comment on the nature of the quotations of Ehrman or Metzger, but I do know that the serious bulk of any discrepancies are not what the various translation differences are about. It is a strawman created to create a preference. No. I may not have given all of the possibilities as to what the site may be about, but it is clearly about something somewhat extreme and/or dogmatic. And, yes, it does represent some of the more extreme of fundamentalist dogmas. Sort of a KJV-only kind of dogma gone haywire. One that has the same kind of dogma attached by some to each of the primary fundamentals, plus a few of the sidebars that some think are just as fundamental. The problem with this whole thread is that it has seemed to presume that fundamentalism in Christians is somewhat kin to the Jihadists among Islamics. If we eliminate a huge amount of what Christian fundamentalism includes and reduce it to the extremists, like this one, or Lee, or that little Baptist church somewhere in mid-America, then we have found a voice for many of them. Sort of a smorgasbord of the fundamentalist dogmas put on steroids and made available for consumption at one location. . . . . Or, are both the case? Maybe. It does not represent the core of historical fundamentalism, other than in base content, but even that is somewhat off-track from the historical core. But it does represent what I almost see as a collection of the worst of the various extremist groups that have arisen from it. KVJ/Textus Receptus dogma. Not only finding fault with side-cults like JWs, and Mormons, it assaults every group that is not as stanch about things as they are: Jesus seminar, claiming the day of the week for worship (Sunday) is really important, overly dogmatic about what it means for God to "not change," takes certain parts of the Trinity dogma to extremes (not saying it is not a good doctrine, but that just like Lee, there is a lot of dogma that arises from it).
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-17-2015, 02:45 PM | #594 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
bearbear, OBW,---Perhaps you prefer Brown's article, because he defends evangelicalism not fundamentalism. Seems he himself recognizes that there are Christians to the right of him who's position is rationally indefensible.
Early on Brown throws his more conservative brethren under the bus: Brown states: Quote:
Quote:
Now Eichenwald's citations demonstrate a familiar fundamentalist phenomenon: Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||
01-17-2015, 05:19 PM | #595 | ||
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 620
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Dr. Michael Brown has actually done previous apologetics and debates against the concept that you can be gay and Christian which was an "in-house debate". Paul says in 1 Cor 5:12 that Christians are to judge those inside the church, not outside, unfortunately this advice has fallen on deaf ears of some that Dr. Brown is referring to. So I think Dr. Brown is referring here to those who are judging and espousing hate towards homosexuals using the bible as a medium to channel their hatred. "Love the sinner but do not love the sin". Every Christian I've met has said something along the same lines regarding LGBT issues. I've read of Westboro Baptist Church and other types like them, but I've yet to meet one in real life. But then again I live in Northern California where even the most evangelical conservative churches lean towards being relationally liberal towards others (focus on loving others and not being judgmental) while remaining conservative in theology (biblical inerrancy etc). I think Michael Brown is referring to the same anecdotal evidence from his own personal experience here. Quote:
http://www.gotquestions.org/hyper-grace.html http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00E78FTKW?btkr=1 You mentioned Michael Brown throwing his far right Westboro Baptist-type brethren under the bus, but I don't think he considers them to be true believers and therefore not his brothers. Jude 1:21 For certain individuals whose condemnation was written about long ago have secretly slipped in among you. They are ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord. Matthew 7:21 "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’ Hebrews 10:26 For if we go on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful expectation of judgment, and a fury of fire that will consume the adversaries.
__________________
1 John 4:9 This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. |
||
01-17-2015, 05:44 PM | #596 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-17-2015, 06:03 PM | #597 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 620
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Regarding hyper-grace, modern hyper-grace is even more extreme than "free grace" which originated from the Brethren movement because it insists confession of sins is unnecessary and the Holy Spirit never convicts us of sin and both are also different from OSAS. For example, Calvinists believe in OSAS but also that a believer needs to demonstrate spiritual fruit and evidence of salvation, one being "perseverance of the saints" - the idea that a truly saved/elect person's faith will endure until the end (Matthew 24:13). So someone who professes belief in Jesus, but later dies recanting their faith was never truly saved or even born again. Another flavor of Calvinism, experimental predestinarians believe you can not be absolutely certain of salvation until you die and find yourself in heaven. David Pawson touches some on this here (interestingly from an Arminian perspective): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy3tSIg7Gi0 In the parable of the sower, temporary belief does not equate to salvation. The seed that fell on the rocky place "believed for a while", but later fell away and bore the same fate as the other seeds except the good earth (Luke 8:13). I think I fall under the lines of 2 Timothy 2:19 where I think Paul tries to capture some of the nuance behind God's salvation and our own response: "Nevertheless, God's solid foundation stands firm, sealed with this inscription: "The Lord knows those who are his," and, "Everyone who confesses the name of the Lord must turn away from wickedness."" Only God knows who's truly saved, but we for sure have to do our part to turn from wickedness (a life characterized by being enslaved to sin), which is different from living a life characterized by righteousness but stumbling into the most serious of sins such as murder and adultery as King David had, and repenting. Yet the Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God. Knowledge of one's salvation could be a private matter that is spirit to Spirit, between us and the Holy Spirit (Romans 8:16), yet it is best to remain humble and have the mindset of working out our salvation with fear and trembling (Phil 2:12) and not proud because God gives grace to the humble and resists the proud.
__________________
1 John 4:9 This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. |
|
01-17-2015, 07:25 PM | #598 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Are there other reasons a person could come to feel "trapped" in the Recovery? What is the process by which Francis Ball and other leaders went from questioning Anaheim's practices, to becoming faithful, trustworthy loyalists? It's as if they underwent some sort of conversion process, the result of which is that they came "under the thumb" of the movement (reference the Rolling Stones song). In some cases I believe there is a serious element of guilt involved. In some cases this guilt may relate to some dark, hidden things. And continued involvement in the movement somehow assuages that guilt. But that's a topic a lot of people don't have the stomach for...
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-17-2015, 08:09 PM | #599 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-18-2015, 06:38 AM | #600 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
There's a risk to/with faith. Not only because it defeats doubt, but because it can also defeat reality, and come to naught, or worse. When you place faith in something it's like placing a bet. It may pay off. It may not. It may be disappointing, with disappointing results and outcomes. Sometimes it can end up being harmful. Not always. But it's not wise to deny reality. I look back and see where it harmed my life to have misplaced faith. It had real consequences. It was misplaced faith that got me in the local church, and kept me in there. So saying that "it's by faith" is not a magic pill. Be careful with it.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-18-2015, 07:35 AM | #601 | |||||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||||||
01-18-2015, 07:39 AM | #602 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
My wife had a friend, a wild thing. She was saved at an Apostolic church. She too went in and out. She'd visit and be on fire for Jesus. The next thing we knew she was jumping into cars and trading sex for crack rocks. Then, she'd show up and be Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, only to be walking the streets again in a month or so. I determined, after witnessing this sort of in and out repetitive behavior, and thinking about it, that, God must love us so much that he provides churches for bipolars.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-18-2015, 07:45 AM | #603 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-18-2015, 09:32 AM | #604 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I, like you, began life in the Pentecostal movement. The AOG. Arose mainly from the Methodists, therefore of Arminian belief on salvation. I grappled with the various verses that seemed to say opposite things for years (though not at much during that time because I was not quite 18 when I joined up with the LRC) before concluding that the Calvinist position seemed more correct. Yet all these years later, I hold a very nuanced view of Calvinism that actually might be best described as being able to look back and declare that it is so. What I think is missing is that most of the places that support eternal security are packaged for us, and have been ingrained in our being as meaning that once the line in the sand is crossed, eternity is secure. But I an coming to believe that this is not what any of it actually says. It is the overlay that we view it through. Those who believe will not perish but have eternal life. But if I cannot find a glimmer of belief in me, how can I claim that saying I had belief in the past is sufficient. It did not say "those who believed" or "those who have at any time, even for just a while, believed." No, it says "believe." And today is time to believe. Just like yesterday and tomorrow. And what is belief if you do not actually live as if the one you are now claiming to be your God, King, Lord, is your God, King, Lord? If I do not obey the one who has the right to command everything, how can I be understood as believing? Maybe believing that I will now spend my eternity elsewhere? The problem is that the proof of belief is not complete success at obedience. But at the same time, lack of any attempt at obedience is probably decent proof of a lack of belief. Therefore the elevator salvation that we both grew up with was not supported by the scripture. But neither was the simplistic "once saved always saved" mantra of the average non-theologian Calvinist. I must believe. And to really believe, I must obey. But failure rather than success while trying to obey is different from failing to try to obey. I realize that this places a completely different dynamic on who is in v out. And I am happy to leave that to God to sort out. And it argues that one of the very important things that should be taught to all believers is obedience. Not just to some list of things, but to righteousness in general. To love for neighbor as self. Whether we are trying to much in our selves, or leaning sufficiently on the Spirit for our working will be a problem, but it is not the difference between unacceptable (works) and acceptable (grace), but rather the proof that we need more of the Spirit in our lives. But once the only "line" is crossed, that of the beginning of belief, the thing that matters is living the belief. Some will do it better than others. Some will have different things put upon them by the Spirit to follow. Some will be asked to lead. All will be asked to be righteous and charitable. If you can't get righteous and charitable right, then leading is out. (And this is where Nee and Lee should be rejected out of hand.) But freezing up over whether you are obedient enough to prevail, so you just quit is a little like declaring your master to be a hard man, reaping where he does not sow (almost wrote that backward), and so burying what you have in the ground. To me, the only question is what is the line at which you simply no longer believe at any level, and therefore cannot be said to believe in the Son. At that point, Arminius (or however you spell the name) was right and Calvin was wrong. Or they both nuanced their messages so much that both accounted for the other and just emphasize different aspects of the spectrum differently? I'm really not sure.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-18-2015, 09:43 AM | #605 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Whichever it is, are you asserting that as your position, or holding it up as a position different from bearbear, worthy of considering, but not necessarily your own? You may see the answer as simply and a no-brainer. But accept the question as meaning your response was not so clear. I admit to being no genius. But when I stare at something for a while and wonder what is intended, I think that others might think the same thing.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-18-2015, 12:27 PM | #606 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
01-18-2015, 05:47 PM | #607 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And I agree that in terms of society, everyone has the right to the pursuit of happiness — ending at the overlap with others' rights. So the discussion is phenomenally nuanced since the Christian life, while full of liberties in Christ, is also full of limitations supplied by Christ. Some of those limitations run counter to the somewhat unrestricted rights provided by the American constitution. And when I write here about things surrounding fundamentalism, I am speaking in terms of the affect on the Christians. And there are plenty of rules put on the Christians by fundamentalists that not only would be disdained by outsiders, but are not even really there for the Christian. And at some level, the problem with fundamentalism is that they are often as much or more worried about how this all ought to affect the non-Christian world and not just looking at the household of faith. And within the household of faith, some level of "cleaning house" might be in order. But when it comes to the world, it is one thing to state your moral preference for no abortions, or limits on the open display of homosexuality, but it is another to take your religious jargon to the political marketplace and start bashing everyone on the head with it. That is such an un-Christian act. So in the world arena, we need to learn how to love our neighbor, whether they are straight or gay; married with children, unmarried and pregnant, or even have had an abortion; etc. That does not mean that within the church there is not a basis to accept a person of homosexual tendencies but direct that they should at least not be known to be pursuing it actively in order to maintain fellowship. I have said it tersely and therefore with no love. But the fact is that they are entitled to pursue their homosexual passions, but are not entitled to demand continued acceptance within the Christian community if they do. It is like the man that Paul told the Corinthians to expel from fellowship until he repents and ceases his sexual affair.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-19-2015, 08:34 AM | #608 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I think it's safe to say that, the church at Corinth was not the only church back then that experienced concupiscence in their midst. Yet we have record of Paul telling just one church to expel for sexual immorality. If Paul hadn't told the Corinthians to expel the immoral one would they have allowed him to stay? What about all the other churches, that weren't told by Paul, to expel those of sexual immorality? Maybe that's why we have the Metropolitan Community Church today. They come down the line that weren't told to expel for sexual immorality ... at least in spirit.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-19-2015, 08:38 AM | #609 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||
01-19-2015, 09:39 AM | #610 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
It is hard for so many that have the insider's view who cannot accept that anyone undertakes homosexual acts other than through sheer desire for some hedonistic pleasure, therefore to them the whole thing is simply sin. They do not consider that no matter how it came to be, some have desires that arise other than by willful intent, therefore failure at abstention is potentially (and at varying levels) no different than a drug addict with a craving for a fix. But on the other side, too many cannot accept that the thing that they crave could be sinful since they assert that God made them that way. I have no basis for taking a position on the debate about being made "that way," so I must treat it as possibly true. But I disagree that God "did it." Rather, it is the fall that did it. It is one of many variations in the makeup of sinful man that must be overcome. Not really different from those with a predisposition to steal, to fall into all kinds of sexual sin, to drink to excess (and loss of virtually all control), etc. Everyone knows how hard it is to abstain from something. It may be something seemingly innocuous, but it is still there. So the healthy Christian assembly will eventually include some who will have certain mannerisms that mark them as homosexuals, but who are at least seeming to abstain from practicing as such. And in that position, it should be no different for them than for anyone else who has joined the community of faith in that they are participants with the body. Only the political debate about the particular sin should mark it as unusual. In all other aspects, it is simply another foible common to man.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-19-2015, 09:49 AM | #611 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Equality is a human invention. Fairness is a human invention. Democracy is a human invention. Why didn’t God include an eleventh commandment?---you shall not enslave another human being. The only evidence of equality and fairness is from Jesus who spoke about the coming kingdom when everyone would be equal. What Jesus spoke out against was the inequity in society which he condemned. Paul never spoke out against slavery or women’s equality. Paul brought his own version of the Christian message which has been followed ever since and of course a bunch of white Caucasian men liked his teachings and made them part of the canon. The group who put the canon together never consulted with one woman or one African or one Hispanic or one Asian person or one gay person…not one. The entire Bible for that matter was written by a bunch of white guys to include books named female such as Ruth etc. Where is the majority of support for the Bible today?---a bunch of white guys. Black slaves wrote songs related to the freedom Jesus mentioned and that is why you do see black churches today and token blacks in white churches. I looked at the church my grandparents, mother and her brothers were raised in and I attended a few times and it is a “white” church. http://www.brightmoorchurch.org/ in the city of Detroit no less.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-19-2015, 10:01 AM | #612 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gjm...ature=youtu.be
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
01-19-2015, 10:24 AM | #613 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
What about hermaphrodites, or babies born with ambiguous genitalia, with both sex organs? Does God make them? They don't choose to be that way, yet they are physically ambiguous, being both male and female. Will they be judged by God for it, like many Christians claim homosexuals will be judged by God? If God makes hermaphrodites He can just as easily make homosexuals. How, then, can God judge homosexuals, that He makes, any more than He can judge those born as hermaphrodites, that He makes? Who really knows what God makes, or judges? God has information not available to us. And why can't gays marry? Don't they deserve to have the right to be just as unhappy as those in heterosexual marriages? From what I've seen, staunch conservative anti-gay Christians experience a change of mind, when one of their children come out as gay. They then have to decide which they love the most, the Bible, or their child. Most choose the child.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-19-2015, 10:53 AM | #614 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Generally, I see the Bible as salvation history in which the concept of God culturally from being a local tribal god to the Creator and Savior of the universe. I also entertain the proposition that ritual precedes myth in the cultural evolution of religion. So, according to that theory, the ancient Jews may have found themselves practicing the tradition of circumcision before this mythological explanation of why they were circumcising males originated. While this was earlier interpreted as a sign of God setting the Jews apart, that process itself came to be seen by Christianity as a vehicle through which God could save humanity. Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||
01-19-2015, 11:27 AM | #615 | ||||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Moses was "white"? All the Prophets were "white"? King David was "white"? Oh, I forgot, all those dudes who painted all those paintings must have seem him in person Oh, and everybody knows that all those first century Galilean fisherman where all pasty white And everybody also knows that the apostle Paul was from that famous "white" tribe of Benjamin Where is the majority of support for the Bible today? Glad you asked! The biggest growth in the Christian Church today is from CHINA (not a lot of whites hangin round there) AFRICA (mostly black) and THE MIDDLE EAST (mostly non-white). In some of these places just possessing a Bible is a major crime, but people are still begging for just a few pages here and there. (maybe you could find the ones missing from yours and mail it to them)
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
||||
01-19-2015, 11:52 AM | #616 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-19-2015, 11:58 AM | #617 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Actually I thought church attendance generally skews disproportionately female? I know where I live, I'm a lot more likely to hear preaching from women than men. And most of them are white women. But some of them have skin of different shades.
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
01-19-2015, 12:02 PM | #618 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
True, but heterosexuality at least could be legitimately expressed through marriage. Not so homosexuality. Life is an experiment, bro.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-19-2015, 12:53 PM | #619 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Perhaps. Just as long as we're experimenting w/ourselves, and not w/others...
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-19-2015, 02:26 PM | #620 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
God made male and female. That was before the introduction of sin. The introduction of sin was due to the actions of Satan.
Quote:
Don't be like the guy who thinks that changing the question over and over again is the same as a solid discussion with boundaries. If you keep changing the question to get a different answer, eventually you may get a different answer, but it may not be for the reason(s) that you think. You may have just pushed it into a completely different discussion. Besides, constantly trying to move the goalposts does not necessarily help us find truth.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-19-2015, 02:48 PM | #621 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
That is a horrible attack on the commands of the Bible. Meanwhile, when their own son/daughter declares their sin, they either dig in and even add fuel to their homophobic hatred, or they chuck it all and decide that it is simply OK. Neither is OK. It is not OK to hate people in that manner, and it is not OK to willfully engage in sin. Until the homosexual person becomes a believer, my only responsibility to them is to love them as I love myself. And I don't hate myself enough to have the kind of hatred toward them that so many display. After belief in Christ, the person with homosexual tendencies, leanings, or whatever you think it actually is, has a propensity for sin that would probably stand right in there with Paul's thorn in the flesh. It is something that must be grappled with and ultimately overcome. Open engagement in the "lifestyle" will be subject to the kind of excommunication that saved a brother from his somewhat similar sin in Corinth. It does not make him a renewed target for hate crimes or derision. But until someone can show me where the Bible does not really stand against homosexuality, just feeling bad for them and letting them go on without consequence is no better than the hateful way that the staunch conservatives attack them when they aren't even claiming to be Christian. And your constant stirring the pot with comments that effectively ignore the conversation that is going on is getting a little annoying. Yes, there are people who claim to be Christians that do not act very Christ-like. We do not need to divert our attention from what we think should be back to the bad apples every time you decide to post something. It is getting a little old. Or are you determined that Christianity is just about people who want to be right and find others to be wrong, therefore constantly worthy of your negative comments and scenarios?
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-19-2015, 02:57 PM | #622 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
01-19-2015, 04:38 PM | #623 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Matthew 19:22-24…22..But when the young man heard this statement, he went away grieving; for he was one who owned much property. 23…And Jesus said to His disciples, "Truly I say to you, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24…"Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."… Matthew 10:7-9…7 "And as you go, preach, saying, 'The kingdom of heaven is at hand.' 8 "Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, cast out demons. Freely you received, freely give. 9 "Do not acquire gold, or silver, or copper for your money belts,… Jesus promised a coming kingdom with equality. This is not a whacky conclusion: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1524117.html Quote:
BTW….You left out South America which has probably had the largest growth and surprisingly they are mostly moderate to left leaning politically compared to the US. I don't expect a response from you because for one thing...there is no responsible answer...otherwise...it's just your way...
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
||||
01-19-2015, 07:57 PM | #624 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I was responding to your statement: "But I disagree that God "did it."" I pointed out that God does actually do physical ambiguous sexuality sometimes, to counter your presumption. Did I misunderstand you? When I stated that when anti-gay Christians discover their child is gay they have a change of mind I'm not speaking in the abstract, constructing a straw man to bring Christianity down. I'm right now involved trying to get one of my cousins out of a debilitating depression. Most all his life he's been a Southern Baptist fundamentalist. He raised his only child as a ideal image of a clean cut straight-laced Christian boy; his/their pride and joy. Not long ago the apple of his eye introduced him/them to his gay lover. It got real ugly. My cousin told his son that he was an abomination to God. They got into fierce fights, even on Facebook, for the whole world to see, much to his shame. My cousin crashed into serious depression, that even prescription drugs have failed to pull him out of. He's questioning the veracity of his Christian faith. He feels like Jesus failed him; cuz Jesus failed to save his son from homosexuality. I have loved my cousin since kids. (I turned him onto Watchman Nee) I'm very concerned about him, and his wife. He told his son that God was going to judge him, and he would go to hell for being a homosexual. So I told my cousin about God creating hermaphrodites. Trying to comfort him. That, God made his son the way that he is, and so can't judge him. But he insists that the Bible condemns homosexuality. This is serious. I'm trying to get my cousin back to loving his son. I've been thru this already, with another anti-gay Southern Baptist cousin, that had to deal with their daughter coming out gay. In fact, it was in discussions with them that hermaphrodite cases came up. Bro Mike, please have patience with me. And don't forget that I'm living smack dub in the middle of fundamentalism, and grew up with it. So the flaws stand out to me. Sorry for that.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-20-2015, 05:12 AM | #625 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I tried to be consistent in stating that the typical rhetoric of hatred that comes from the mouths of so many is not welcome, whether pointed at an unregenerate or regenerated person of homosexual persuasion. That did not make expressions of homosexuality suddenly acceptable. I'm not sure what it is that brought that statement, unless it was where I said something like seeing some homosexual mannerisms in the meetings (in another post or an unquoted part of this one). While no one likes stereotypes, there are things that people do that are "tells" that are not, in themselves, any kind of sin. Where found, it is often part of having been among a subculture that lives a certain way (outwardly) and it becomes the habitual way of living for them. I do not condemn that — just note that it will be visible. If that was not it, then I am not sure what you are talking about. There are plenty of non-sexual aspects of love that are understood as the activities between people who do, or maybe will engage in sexual behavior. Not certain where they become part of the unacceptable part of the "lifestyle" and where they do not. Personally, I think that much of anything that evidences same-gender union is, at minimum, dancing around the flames of passion, and contrasts to the same activities directed toward heterosexual union. Even at just the dating phase. In short, the only thing that I think should have been considered "acceptable" would be personal mannerisms. But, like other things, I can be persuaded.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-20-2015, 05:38 AM | #626 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
It is not. Therefore your tack-on conclusions would appear to be based upon a "fact" upon which we do not agree. But there is no guarantee in life that everyone around you, whether related or not, will live in the manner you choose for them. And as long as we conclude that the outcome of our children will be dictated by God if we do X, Y, and Z, then we are living yet another version of the healthy, wealthy, and wise gospel. I would not abandon your cousin. But you cannot just join in his finger-pointing as he deals with his grief. If believing parents always resulted in believing and obedient children, then the Western world would be virtually all Christian because there is at least one Christian parent somewhere back in everyone's past. If they could guarantee the outcomes of their kids, then that would guarantee the outcome of the next generation, and so on. Marry into the families with no such ancestor and now their next generation is affected. Christianity would not be waning in Europe, but growing toward saturation. And becoming Christian was never a guarantee for a better set of current circumstances. Yes we pray for that. And sometimes we get it. But not always. The jobs lost in the latest recession were not all non-Christians. The lives lost in the 9/11 attacks were not all heathen. Yet we are prone to look at particular circumstances and ask God "why me?" when the real question is "how long, oh God?".
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-20-2015, 01:08 PM | #627 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
The fundamental question is: Does God judge for it? And: If God judges for it should we? To the typical Christian, of the fundamentalist persuasion, if not family related, the loud answer is: YES! But let your son or daughter come out and it's another matter altogether. Now your heart is torn apart. It's very traumatic. It put both my cousins into a tailspin. I remember my cousin, a deacon in his SBC, telling me that he went to members of his church about his daughter coming out. I remember it well. He said, "The ones that knew their Bible the best had the most hateful advice." Fortunately he and her mother didn't take their advice. They didn't disown their daughter. They chose the way of love. She died about a year ago. At their house. Of a heart attack. They're very glad they decided to love her, and accept her as she was; as the person -- so her mother says -- she was born to be. Did God do it? If so He can't judge someone for it. Did the devil do it? Then God can't judge the person for that either. Did the fall cause it? Would a just and fair God judge for something caused by the fall? Wouldn't it be expected? Or did nature cause it? If so there's no judgment at all, one way or another, to be found. Does the Bible judge it? That's a resounding YES!!! And thus the inner heart and mind conflict of the fundamentalist thrown into discovering their child is gay. May the love of God be with them.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-20-2015, 02:51 PM | #628 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I'm sure that you are understanding what I have said, yet it seems that you are so focused on the wrong that so many do in the name of right.And this particular quote is among the most telling of the failures among us to follow the great commandment because if someone can say that, then we are not loving or neighbor as ourselves.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
01-20-2015, 03:37 PM | #629 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
This conversation seems awfully dualistic to me.
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
01-20-2015, 08:13 PM | #630 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I understand the sentiment, but I believe that this conversation has gone where it should have been decades ago.
There should be a kind of dualism in the Christian life. It is loving toward God and everyone else, but hard on itself as it sees how it is failing in the call to truly believe and obey. It is like the verses that say don't judge anyone while others seem to say to judge. Seems that we are not to usurp God's place in judgment on the world, but we are to judge among ourselves, such as in areas of personal weakness and in church discipline. But remember that church discipline is for the church, not the heathen (or as I sometimes say, heathren — opposite of brethren). We are to love and preach the gospel to the heathen. And most of our preaching should be without words. If they can't find reason to want us to speak because our wordless preaching is poor (or nonexistent) then speaking will not really help much. They need a reason to ask us about our hope. And unloading our stance against whatever the sin of the month club is selling is not a very good enticement for asking about the hope we have.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
01-21-2015, 08:56 AM | #631 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Then add, : "Love your enemy," and ,"resist not evil," and we're talking the impossible. Who can keep what Jesus taught? Not even the fundamentalists can keep it. I don't see anyone that's kept those teachings of Jesus; maybe Gandhi, and he wasn't Christian. The Bible must be the word of God. That's why we can't keep and live it.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-21-2015, 09:12 AM | #632 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||
01-21-2015, 09:15 AM | #633 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I usually think of dualism as a kind of metaphysical position which doesn't seem to be what you mean. Please clarify.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-21-2015, 11:38 AM | #634 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I think that persuasion makes it almost completely about outside forces and/or a simple decision consciously made. It is more complex than that. But at the same time I am not sure that even birth defects are absolute determiners of homosexuality. There appears to be an aspect in which environment has an effect. But even that is not sole arbiter of the issue. I will leave it at "it is complex" and note that no matter how it comes to be, the Christian response for someone who has already gone down that road (whether by genetics or persuasion) is to treat it as a sin that must be overcome. I know that is not a popular position among those who want to cause the Bible to simply allow homosexuality. I did not create what I read and understand. And so far no one has managed to do more than make those "it's not fair" and "it seems that a loving God would" arguments without foundation other than the determination that it should not be so (in their minds). This is one of those places where it is somewhat instructive to say that in the beginning, God made man in his image, and man has been returning the favor ever since. We want a God that thinks like we do, not a God that requires that we think like he does. Quote:
No, I do not agree with beating things out of our kids. But I do not consider that separating them from an environment in which they are encouraged to undertake the mannerisms that will label them as part of, the drive them to the groups in which homosexuality is accepted, practiced, and taught would be a bad thing. To the extent that you are aware, and can take action, you would not allow them to be part of a group that regularly robs other students and stores, and vandalizes property. If you believe that homosexuality is a sin, just praying your kid will withstand the pressures as the group that is accepting him/her pushes them that way is more than foolish. Until they leave my home, I have a responsibility. I can't just let political correctness keep me from my duties. And yet the response when a child announces that they are homosexual should not be "hit the road Jack." Pray that it is not over. Pray that God will get through to them. Do what you think you can do to change their mind. Even if it is not simply a persuasion, the mind can still be changed concerning how they respond to their own desires.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
||
01-21-2015, 01:27 PM | #635 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
“Our communion table is open to everyone. There are no requirements or limitations. God welcomes all with open arms, and so do we!From the standpoint of Christian fundamentalists this Christian church is a paradox but yet they tread where most Christians fear to go. In fact, they set an example of acceptance which most Christians are unable to live out in their lives. It is often a haven for those who are rejected by their families, other Christians, and many in society. However, they are as devoted Christians as anyone on this forum.. People interpret the Bible according to their own prejudices whether it was the KKK or against slaves or even women. It wasn’t the fundamentalist Christians who fought for women’s rights. It was Susan B. Anthony, a Unitarian, who was at the forefront. Fundamentalist Christians were screaming bloody murder over freeing the slaves as well establishing civil rights for women. Christians today are also fighting against environmental improvements or any rights for people who are different from them. It is a long standing pattern. In these instances, Christians are involved in the practice known as doublespeak---say one thing and do another whether consciously or not. Unfortunately, it is not a perception but a reality.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-21-2015, 03:40 PM | #636 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I have little to add to your post, although I think that virtually every fight for and against progressive positions, such as on slavery and women's rights, have had Christians on both sides making claims that theirs it the right way.
But the following statement is a bit odd in the midst of this discussion: Quote:
It is difficult to assert that the current fundamentalists would have been on the "wrong" side of the issue if they had been around in the mid-1800s or the turn of the century. It is a speculation based on the fact that part of fundamentalism seems to be a fight against any change. But in the face of a God whose morality is not a matter of convenience or popular opinion, that is not an entirely unreasonable position. At least as the place from which the argument must move rather that the point that is simply presumed wrong. I am not saying that there have not been people around that fit the popular (and broader) used of the term forever. But the Christian fundamentalism which is supposedly the target of this thread was not around in the mid-1800s. On either side of the slavery debate. (I hate to think where I might have been on that discussion if I was around then. Isn't it best when you can look at arguments of the past and see the right answer when already decided?)
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-21-2015, 04:02 PM | #637 | ||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Right, including YOU. And your interpretation (if you can even call it that) is shaded by a rather archaic and whacked out worldview. I thought anyone who had experienced the Witness Lee "ALL Christians are this, or ALL Christians are that" garbage wouldn't fall back into that kind of all-or-nothing, black-and-white kind of mentality.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
||
01-21-2015, 06:15 PM | #638 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I am trying to make a distinction between Christians who are/were progressive and those who wanted and want to keep progress in check i.e. the fundamentalist Christians for the most part. It's not that I don't know what I am talking about...my parents lived in N.C. when I came back from Nam and I saw it first hand. I have already noted elsewhere on this forum what I saw and experienced so I don't want to repeat it here.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-21-2015, 07:07 PM | #639 | |||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I am sure my world view is different than yours but then again I respect your world view even if you believe that the KJV is the only Bible to read, the earth is 6000 years old, dinosaurs were put on earth by the Devil to try and confuse Christians today, or that they were too big to fit on the Ark, or that two people were formed by God to create the entire world population and all languages starting with Hebrew, angels mated with women in Genesis, etc. Could all of this be true? Maybe, but the probability would most likely be very low. Of course, I am not saying you specifically believe all of that but even if you did I would respect it although it would be open to discussion from my standpoint. Quote:
Quote:
In any case, awareness and OBW were discussing the issue of awareness' relative being gay, the prejudice that surrounds it as well as how people become gay to include parenting and the interaction of the Biblical point of view. I only added to the conversation that there are Christians who are LGBT and in fact they are an entire Christian denomination. In context it was obvious I was referencing a point of view of some fundamental Christians and not all Christians by using that example. How you came up with some comparison to Witness Lee is beyond me. Your response led away from the point of my earlier post and apparently I led you here which was not my intention.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|||
01-22-2015, 03:09 AM | #640 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I've seen young people being ostracized from within their "locality" so many times. And insinuating that a young person was "gay," "asexual," or otherwise sexually "different," was often just one bullet point on a list of things that were being whispered around town. The other things being said were often of a spiritual nature, and sometimes race or nationality was even an issue for these people. To put it a different way, zeek, do you think there's some kind of firewall between culture and biology?
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-22-2015, 05:46 AM | #641 | |||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Of course, we could simply go back to decide what version of "Fundamentalism" we are going to talk about here. Seems that we (not just you) are equivocating all over the place on this. The Christian group that took on the mantle of "Fundamentalist" earlier in the 20th century was not about race, gender, or orientation. It was about remaining true to what was understood as facts in the Bible and not just stories told to make points with people. Did they draw the lines well? Not entirely. But it was a point of divergence in theology that was resisted. At the same time, since part of the core of that movement was/is the constancy of the Bible and the Christian faith, it collects those who are resistant to any kind of change. So among its ranks would be those who will not even think about the righteous position on the equality of all people. Or the value of a woman relative to a man. So which are we talking about? The Christian fundamentalists, or those who will resist any change, especially where it goes against the preconceived notions of right and wrong without regard to the Bible, while carving up the Bible to make their case? You might want to argue that they are simply the same group and I will disagree. Most of what you would call evangelicalism is fundamentalist in the sense of holding to Biblical truth. But they are far from all on board with the continued positions of bigotry and hatred. Quote:
Quote:
I have stated enough about what I see as the problem today. And unless you have something that actually provides a different view, I have been unable to conclude that God is accepting of the behaviors that have been traditionally understood as sin. But I disagree that God is unaccepting of the people or that he has somehow decreed that we are to treat them differently just because their sin is "X" rather than something else. I think I have said enough on this. And I think that the process of simply pointing at those who take the bigoted approach to things and rag on them is not really worth a lot. We do need to recognize it. But mostly so that we do not become part of it. They should hear what I believe is the true Christian approach (not that I think I have a corner on what that is — I am still open to reconsideration of things and that is how I got where I am today). Enough. If you want to create a super-fundamentalist group that simply uses the Bible from age to age to fight against real Christian progress, then you are not looking at anything much different than Islamic fundamentalism. And both are problematic. That does not mean that there are not fundamentals that we should stand for within our community of faith. Just not all the ones that those people stand for.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|||
01-22-2015, 07:31 AM | #642 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
In Wikipedia, Christian Fundamentalism is defined as “…a movement manifested in various denominations with various theologies, rather than a single denomination or systematic theology…” so to that extent it is rather broad. What I am referring to mostly, however, is the politicization of Fundamentalist Christianity starting with Reagan and the moral majority. At that point Christian fundamentalism took on a new direction and that is what is often referred to as the Fundamentalist Christianity we are looking at today. However, this politicization didn’t just pop up overnight as it had been brewing for decades which I have noted previously. Now, the discussion among Fundamental Christians is often not the virgin birth or Biblical inerrancy but anti-abortion, pro-life, charter schools, anti-gay etc. which has indirectly been related to the more recent posts you and awareness have discussed. Thus, today, religious leaders and policy organizations are urging Americans to vote with their "Biblical values", and to be a Fundamentalist Christian now means to support one or, at most, a small handful of policy positions. When religion is thus reduced to political policy decisions and support for a political party, it is at the very least a distraction from the basics of the Christian message. This abuse of religion for political purposes has impacted American politics as well as problematic for discussion of Biblical thought. Record numbers of Americans are now reporting that they have no particular religious affiliation and this has been born out by the latest Pew reports which show a decline in US Christian churches and you can go to faithcommunitiestoday.org and see the same trends. I hope this clears up somewhat where I have been coming from in regards to fundamental Christianity.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-22-2015, 07:50 AM | #643 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
The truth is, the Southern Baptist broke off from the Baptists, because the Baptists took an official position against slavery. So here we have, we could say, two fundamentalist groups of Christians, one for and one against slavery. So Mike is right to ask which fundamentalism we are talking about. Unless, of course, we don't consider the Baptist abolitionist's as fundamentalists. Then we have a new contribution to this thread toward defining fundamentalism: A fundamentalist must be a supporter of holding slaves ... cuz the Bible treats slavery as a social fact ... and the one thing a fundamentalist is, is a follower of the Bible.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-22-2015, 07:58 AM | #644 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And therein we find the divide. There are, in effect, two overlapping groups that are labeled as fundamentalist Christians — those that seek to maintain standards from the Bible (even if sometimes errantly) and those who seek to push personal convictions (called moral convictions, but sometimes somewhat immoral in the way it is undertaken) and want to wrap the Bible around it. And while they are at it, wrap the flag around it. And I admit that the two groups overlap. And it may be that the political group is entirely found inside of the Christian group, although that may be at least partly because of identification through heritage and social values rather than true identification with Christ. And there is one of the real problems in the whole equations. Many identify with the goals and positions of the social Christianity that they see, but do not truly identify with Christ other than as the alleged focus for their claim to the "right" (v wrong, not v left). This discussion would be more tenable if we didn't simply start with fundamentalism under one way of thinking, then constantly bounce back and forth between the group that stood for the fundamentals of the Bible in the earlier 20th century (in intra-Christian effort) and the fanatics that use the church as a political block to force their version of Christian morality on everyone via the sword of the government (outside of the true Christian mission). It makes the discussion about homosexuality so difficult because anything that doesn't simply allow it, even in the church, is wrapped in the cloak of the political arm of the Moral Majority and its successors. I believe that the church does have to make stands, but only within its ranks, not external to them. Our position to the world is without judgment in the sense that our love should not be withheld. Period. But within our ranks, there is cause for judgment and discipline. And in this sense, we should live a life that appears divided with itself. We should be able to be righteous and loving toward everyone, even those who sin in ways that we cannot simply ignore as being sin. Yet we should also be strong with ourselves to refrain from sin, and to seek to turn away from the sin that remains in us. And that is for us, not for the world. If we can truly learn this lesson, we can come to understand what it really means to love everyone, yet hate sin. Even the sin in the sinners that you love. It is great theory/theology. And I seek to make it part of my life. Am I always successful? No. And I never will fully be so. But that is what I strive toward.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-22-2015, 08:04 AM | #645 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Say "cult" meaning that someone follows a particular pastor or minister too closely, and some immediately presume suicide cult. The term legitimately applies to both, but not equally.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-22-2015, 09:06 AM | #646 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
01-22-2015, 09:37 AM | #647 |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
No, a fundamentalist (whatever that is) does not have to be a supporter of holding slaves anymore than he has to be a supporter of crucifying people for their beliefs. No, the Bible does NOT treat slavery as a social fact, at least not in the way you are implying. Fallen humans, even ones that claim to follow the Bible, will do what fallen humans have always done since the Fall, and this includes enslaving their fellow human beings. Harold, you're a funny man...you're a biblical literalist when it suits your purposes (to discredit and denigrate), then in the next breath you will claim the Bible is myth and fairy tells. Kind of frustrating but at the same time entertaining.
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
01-22-2015, 12:19 PM | #648 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Ya don't say.
Btw, Socrates, did you ever watch The Village?
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
01-22-2015, 01:03 PM | #649 | ||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
||
01-22-2015, 01:52 PM | #650 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
One assembly stopped directly encouraging its members with respect to the anti-abortion marches and activities, but did support abortion recovery ministries for those affected by it. And they stopped making any statements concerning any political issue, position, or candidate. And they got some heated words from a few. But it was a few — out of close to 4,000. Another is not as far down the path as the first, but is getting there. They do not recommend on political campaigns other than to suggest that you should vote. In both there is a growing realization that those things are not the message of the church, or of the cross. But if you poll the participants, in both cases you will find some number of people who are determined that Jesus would be a Republican and picket any government or court that allowed for gay marriage. And my complaint would be that taking that position is not an excommunicable offense. Therefore the taint of bigotry of some (whether many or just a few) will be felt by those who do not hold to such things, and by the group even where they are actively changing their official positions contrary to such bigotry. I am not proposing a push to make bigotry an excommunicable offense. But I am beginning to refrain from just being silent when the standard old socially conservative claptrap is spoken as if gospel truth. They should at least be confronted with the idea that everyone that is not a "liberal" Christian does not agree with them. And while there are not that many who are vocal, I am discovering that there are some who are at least grappling with the issues and not just going with the old ways of thinking.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
01-22-2015, 05:50 PM | #651 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Not yet. But, it's in my Netflix queue. Are the villagers fundamentalists? Wait, no spoilers!
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-22-2015, 06:11 PM | #652 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And you're not the only one frustrated with my literalism. It drives bro Zeek completely crazy. That's cuz fundamentalism sloshes all around in me. It is the given reference point I grew up with. But I'm glad I entertain you. And I have to remark. Maybe we haven't nailed down just what fundamentalism is but one thing seems obvious: The Bible accepts slavery and rejects homosexuality. But does it really:http://www.academia.edu/2507704/_An_...5_2010_723-729
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-22-2015, 06:22 PM | #653 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And bro Ray, you nailed it. Socrates is a great name for bro zeek
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-22-2015, 06:47 PM | #654 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
"The Fellowship is anti-labor, anti-gay, and pro-life. It is also anti-communist, but not necessarily a firm believer in democracy. Rather, it favors a totalitarianism for Christ, a sort of Christian theocracy. In foreign policy, it promotes a “soft” U.S. expansionism. Is the Fellowship a cult, cabal, or a right-wing conspiracy? Whatever it is, we should be concerned that a secretive, privately funded group — without public scrutiny — is profoundly influencing U.S. domestic and foreign policy. At the heart of the Fellowship’s spiritual advice for its proxies in Congress is the conviction that the market’s invisible hand represents the guidance of God." http://www.fogcityjournal.com/wordpr...-organization/
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-22-2015, 09:03 PM | #655 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I think, perhaps, ray was speaking ironically. I don't call anyone a fundamentalist except one who says s/he believes the five fundamentals or says s/he is a fundamentalist. I do see the family resemblance of Christian fundamentalists to so-called Islamic Fundamentalists. But, I'm perfectly happy to call them something else. I don't call anyone a Christian except those who call themselves that. The statement "so-and-so seems like a Christian" is ambiguous. The word means so many different things to different people in different contexts that by itself it means nothing.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-22-2015, 09:30 PM | #656 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-22-2015, 11:27 PM | #657 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
That question is a bit ironic, no?
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-22-2015, 11:36 PM | #658 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Bro Lee employed this kind of thinking all the time. Either be part of "the recovery," or go back to the dark side which is "degradation." Maybe we could call it a false choice.
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-23-2015, 07:00 AM | #659 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I think all in the Recovery embrace the Five Fundamentals.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
01-23-2015, 08:00 AM | #660 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
01-23-2015, 08:09 AM | #661 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Well Lee specifically identified his Recovery with fundamentalism easy so he made the job easy. Of course, it was a relatively spiritualized, inner life kind of fundamentalism. So, I think it's pretty safe to say that most LC members are fundamentalists although in that particular Local Church way.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-23-2015, 08:15 AM | #662 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
01-23-2015, 08:18 AM | #663 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Lee embraced them and he was calling the shots.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-23-2015, 09:12 AM | #664 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Turns out I'm like the neutral angels, that didn't take sides with God or Satan.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
01-23-2015, 09:58 AM | #665 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||
01-23-2015, 11:00 AM | #666 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
One thing about the Bible which I find interesting is that it is full of metaphors (of course WL's teaching were based on metaphors): "My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me" John 10:27 "I am the good shepherd, . . . and I lay down my life for the sheep" John 10:14-15 "Ye are the salt of the earth: . . . Ye are the light of the world" Matthew 5:13-14 "I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in Him, the same bringeth forth much fruit" John 15:5. The husbandman that laboreth must be first partaker of the fruits" (II Timothy 2:3,5,6). "…wise as serpents, and harmless as doves" Matthew 10:16 "…as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house…a royal priesthood" (I Peter 2:5,9) to offer up spiritual sacrifices. Jesus was also referred to as food, water, and air. Was it metaphor when he was described as “Messiah” or “Savior of the world”? Was the virgin birth a metaphor? Crucifixion, Resurrection, Ascension? Maybe some of them were intended as metaphors but are taken literally. Are there political metaphors in the NT?
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-23-2015, 01:19 PM | #667 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Ah, now this is an interesting question. And a sticky one. Recovery-ites love not being able to be pinned down. And sometimes they love it when "Christianity" misunderstands their beliefs. Provides them w/some kind of validation, perhaps.
It was in the Recovery that I heard that the story of creation, Adam and Eve, and who knows what else in the Old Testament, might not be what "literally" happened. It was in the Recovery that I learned that "microevolution" might be perfectly compatible with the Christian faith, even if not "macroevolution." But then, it was also in the Recovery that I learned that James and the Psalms aren't really a part of the Bible the way other books are. It was in the Recovery that I heard all kinds of hyper-subjectivized and mystical notions. And that's enough to make some "fundamentalist" Christians wonder how "fundamental" the Recovery is.
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
01-23-2015, 01:21 PM | #668 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
My sense is that in the Recovery worldview, "fundamentalism" and "evangelicalism" are just considered as more of big, bad, "degraded Christianity."
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-23-2015, 01:27 PM | #669 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Here's a quiz designed to answer the question : What kind of Christian are you?
http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/Chri...n-Are-You.aspx Disclaimer: I am not vouching for the validity of this quiz.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-23-2015, 01:50 PM | #670 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Well, that's true. Lee did call fundamentalism "incomplete." But, i think he was on board with the five fundamentals. They just weren't enough. He had gone waaaaaaaaaaay beyond them.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
01-23-2015, 01:54 PM | #671 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
You are A Bishop John Shelby Spong Christian image: http://www.beliefnet.com/~/media/FD1...2FDFBA420.ashx A.k.a. a Marcus Borg, Karen Armstrong Christian. Your Christian history begins with the Gospel of Thomas, or at least you'd like to include any and all ancient reports on Jesus in your understanding of the Christian savior. Some people call you a "mainline" Christian, which is an odd moniker since "mainline" is simply shorthand for historic denominational Christianity in America. But for several decades, mainliners like you have not identified with evangelical Christianity and have incorporated liberal theological concepts into the practice of the faith. Read more at http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/Chri...m7hwRzKFqPJ.99 So, zeek, what kind of Christian are you?
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
01-23-2015, 03:18 PM | #672 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 600
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And even putting that aside, we're talking about a group where the leadership talks about what they will "say" to Witness Lee, when they "see him again" (after he was deceased). I think for a lot of self-avowed "fundamentalists," attitudes/beliefs like that would call into serious question how much they really "believe" the other five points.
__________________
And for this cause, the Good Shepherd left the 99 pieces of crappy building material, and went out to recover the one remnant piece of good building material. For the Lord will build His church, and He will build it with the good building material, not the crappy kind. |
|
01-23-2015, 05:16 PM | #673 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
01-23-2015, 06:57 PM | #674 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And bro Ray, perhaps Recoverites aren't fundamentalists ... but worse.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
02-09-2015, 12:49 PM | #675 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Did Darwin kill God? BBC documentary proposes that both the Ultra-Darwinists and the Creationists get it wrong. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7hjomphSTg
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
02-09-2015, 02:54 PM | #676 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
02-09-2015, 07:13 PM | #677 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
He is on to something as you will see if you watch the rest of the film. It lasts an hour. After that the material started repeating itself like a bad splice job. The documentary is also available in smaller segments on youtube if you prefer.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
02-23-2015, 05:35 AM | #678 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I was interested in determining the differences between fundamentalists and evangelicals, if any? I came across this article which surprised me in some ways. It is a couple years (April 2012) old but it delves into issues surrounding these differences and it talks about the new fundamentalism emerging out of evangelicalism. It’s an article by Roger E. Olson: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereo...undamentalist/
This forum (LCD) is and probably intentionally so difficult to determine who is who (as far as beliefs or doctrines) because there is not a lot of clarity as to how members distinguish themselves other than a few basic doctrines. I am beginning to wonder if some have dropped the WL stuff only to pick similar dogmatic positions which amount to the same thing. Of course, forget practices (i.e. do they attend church at all, listen to the 900 Club 3 times a day, or to clarify this issue---live out their lives in the way they preach). There are only a couple people who have clarified their practices let alone their doctrines. Of course, it’s not necessary to know this other than trying to understand “fundamentalism” which we have been trying to do on this thread. Anyway, here are some excerpts from this article: “The new evangelicalism was to be a broad tent that included everyone from conservative Presbyterians to Pentecostals to Advent Christians to Nazarenes to (recently) the Worldwide Church of God. Fundamentalists were invited to join but declined…. As an heir of and scholar working within the new evangelicalism movement I have found it necessary to warn fellow new evangelicals about a neo-fundamentalism taking shape and growing among us. Its adherents are not exactly like the older fundamentalists, so it’s not easy to identify them. For one thing, they don’t call themselves fundamentalists. They call themselves conservative evangelicals and attempt to style themselves as mainstream evangelicals, even “confessional evangelicals” and so forth. (Using positive-sounding labels that imply THEY are the “real” evangelical heirs of the postfundamentalist evangelical movement.) The problem is that these new fundamentalists, who are, admittedly, evangelicals too, are not easy to identify. They pass themselves off as mainstream evangelicals, the heirs of Carl Henry, for example. Henry, however, denied that inerrancy was a litmus test of authentic evangelical faith. And, as strongly opinionated as he was about many matters, he attempted to keep the evangelical “tent” broad and inclusive… Something truly awful is stirring within evangelicalism. It’s directly analogous to what has happened in the Republican Party. I call on moderate evangelical leaders to stand up and speak out against it. So far most have not. None dare call it fundamentalism…”
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
02-23-2015, 10:26 AM | #679 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
What is a matter of belief subjectively becomes a matter of identity objectively. Belief is a first person subjective "act". Identifying as a "Christian" or a "fundamentalist" or an "evangelical" or whatever is a social act that defines a person's relationship with others. It seems to me that holding dogmatic positions about anything is inescapably a social phenomenon. So, it immediately becomes complicated. Olsen's article illustrates the complications well. A familiar thought experiment evokes the problem: Don't think of an elephant. There's no way to process that directive without thinking of an elephant. Both the thought and it's negation are posited in the mind. Similarly, if one is commanded to believe in an inerrant Bible, or a virgin birth or whatever, both the affirmation and its negation are implied and understood. So, when an individual identifies with a group that demands that one affirm a thesis and deny it's antithesis, a kind of self-denial takes place. That self-denial involves presenting a false persona to the world because it denies the subjective process that must take place to get to that position. Henceforth, the believer presents only the believing side to the world and stuffs the rest. A truly effective believer [what Hoffer called a "true-believer"] even ceases to be aware of the process that got her to this state. Or, so it seems to me at the moment, such may be the case. Because, once one allows oneself the freedom to think, one no longer is obliged to adhere to a dogma or to force a conclusion. Think about it.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
02-23-2015, 05:32 PM | #680 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
02-24-2015, 07:45 AM | #681 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
02-24-2015, 01:02 PM | #682 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I read Olsen's blog as well. Pretty consistent with some others I have been reading lately. It has been fairly obvious from way back that Christian fundamentalism, whether strictly on religious issues, or social, has been a subset of what should be evangelicalism. But their hard stand on certain issues tended to make them not want to be part of evangelicalism. It was the labeling of terrorists with the same term that changed their minds. Now they want to be evangelicals. But not just any evangelicals. They mean "conservative evangelicals." While it may be that there has always been a theological similarity between the two groups, it was that fundamentalists tended to add-in more things to the core and then to hold to them all more strongly than any of the rest of us hold to the true core of the faith. Oh, we hold to it quite well. But mostly with respect to ourselves. We try not to be fighting over the stuff unless there is sufficient reason to believe that there is no true common ground. But the fundamentalists insist that it is all core and must be adhered to by all. And while they are at it, they are going to push the non-believing world into living under it as well. Therefore the Moral Majority, the Christian Coalition, and the follow-ons and offshoots. I would be much happier to be understood as someone who had theological differences with many within evangelicalism, and yet could generally get along with all of them, plus most of the others (including the RCC in general). That does not mean that I can always sit quietly when serious theological error, or a propensity for following truly errant teachers is in play. But even there, I am not dismissing them all to (at minimum) 1,000 years in a dark closet. Reminds me of an article I read back in 2009 ago in which it was declared that if you are tolerant of something, it means that you are intolerant of it. The premise was that if you didn't simply agree, then you were intolerant. And this was coming from a postmodernist "no absolute truth" source. It turns out that there are no absolute truths as long as whatever truths you hold to do not seem to make me out to be wrong. Then you cannot disagree with me. Sounds a lot like absolute truth. My way or the highway. Or have no opinion on it at all. Either position is a mockery of human existence and of the postmodernism it was allegedly coming from. We will always have differing opinions. The only problem is in what we do about them.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
02-24-2015, 01:09 PM | #683 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Now, to moderate my statements on evangelicalism, one problem with a lot on the inside of evangelicalism is that the rank and file are too often more zealous for their positions than their leaders. It seems funny to me that they seem to miss when the preacher tells them that how they live is much more important than what doctrines they hold to. Yet for many, it is easier to argue about doctrines, and there is still a propensity for declaring obedience as a form of works which has been abolished.
So there is probably no completely non-fundamentalist group of evangelicals because there are fundamentalists buried within them. And this is where it would be so much better to care less for the doctrines, let the theologians hash it out with other theologians (they tend to be a little nicer to each other) and just obey. But that puts a lot of us back into the place where there are no works and we can't be there. We don't listen when we are told otherwise. And we would simply go elsewhere if it were made too clear that we got it wrong. (Note that I say "we" because no matter how much I see this as wrong, I am probably still part of the problem at times.)
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
02-25-2015, 08:48 AM | #684 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||||
02-25-2015, 10:00 AM | #685 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
"Why" is irrelevant. I am speaking of evangelicalism as it is properly understood rather than how is is fractured, such as into "new evangelicalism" which is just fundamentalism renamed.
If you are questioning why there is an evangelicalism, that is a rather broad topic. I would think that it is a way of approach to the Christian life and theology that is broad in inclusion, narrow in exclusion, but is not of the liberal camp of Christianity. Pretty vague. Things like those that you and others came up with as the "fundamentals" in the early stages of this thread. The list that went at least into the 20s if not beyond. Quote:
While this stands somewhat in contradiction to the very kind of belief of Christianity, I have to believe in Christ for it to be meaningful to me. The fact that He is what/who he is, and that all he said is true (and absolutely so) may be a fact, but it is of little use to convincing someone who doesn't believe. They have to see it for themselves. At that point they believe. Sometimes it is easier to realize that declaring something to be absolutely true is a barrier to getting people to consider it. We all like to think that there is a reason that something is true, and we should be smart enough to figure it out. If you just want to shove it down my throat, then many will simply resist, no matter how absolutely true it is. So while I absolutely agree with absolute truth, it really does little for the conversation to declare it to be so. Sort of like declaring the Bible to be inerrant. Depends on what you mean by inerrant. And what aspects are inerrant. And how it is that it is inerrant. And so on.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
02-25-2015, 10:24 AM | #686 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Further on the absolute truth discussion above.
I note that if we are right and the Bible is right and God will effectively level a lot of the earth as we know it. And if some of the people will be destined for an eternity in a place we call Hell, then it is absolutely true whether anyone believes it or not. But how we arrive at this is not through evidence of the absolute truth of it, but through faith. Therefore it is not an observable (at this point in time) fact, like observations in a science experiment. So the absoluteness of the truth, while very real, is not something that everyone agrees is absolute — or even true. That doesn't make it not true. Or not absolutely so. But it does no one any good to dwell on it that way. Yes, a completely self-identified truth that does not have to be true for anyone else is a kind of farce and somewhat of a slippery slope into a worse form of "everyone did what was right in his own eyes." It is an invitation to anarchy. But we are living in a time when even the scientific "truths" that the average person thinks of as "laws" of physics are being overturned rapidly. Someone got hit on the head with an apple and we thought we knew something. Someone measured the acceleration of falling things and we knew more. Then someone hypothesized a situation in which two people could have time move at different speeds (all at the same time). And that gave us the way to create unimaginable power with very little matter. But that was not the end of it. And some of that was proved to be only partly true. And on we go. So scientific "fact" starts to lose its certainty. And people despair that there is anything that is simply true. And that is because they do not see beyond the latest declaration of what is true. And the problem with that declaration is that it typically overreaches its power to explain. Not because of bad intent, but bad use of evidence. Or incomplete information. So, yes, declaring there is no absolute truth is foolish. Yet if we cannot find it, then it is not observably true. For some, that is the reason to throw up their hands in despair. A lot like getting burned in one of many Christian cults and then deconstructing everything about it, including the Christianity that it claimed not to be a part of. As if the fact of an error means no truth. (oversimplified) Postmodernism is not really about declaring no absolute truth. They are just skeptical of claims of what it is. They have seen even science being discarded (or at least redefined at the edges) and refuse to let anyone tell them that they have found "it." "It" may be something important, but how are you so sure that it is "it" and there is no more? That it is the whole story? There surely is a truth. The question is whether they/we have found it. Or just something that is relatively true today.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
02-25-2015, 03:07 PM | #687 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||
02-26-2015, 11:35 AM | #688 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
02-26-2015, 02:50 PM | #689 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I'm way behind. But since this lists all those UntoHim has said isn't allowed on his forum I had to paste this:
Christian fundamentalists create 'Bigotry Map' of people intolerant of their faith: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...al-agenda.html Fundamentalists playing the victim ... very funny. It's not the gays, atheists, and humanists that are their problem. It's the scientific revolution, education, and facts.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
02-26-2015, 03:13 PM | #690 |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Harold my friend, I have never said any such thing (and you know this but you just wanted to see if I was paying attention)
ANY member of the forum is allowed to view and participate on Alternative Views and this has been the case since the beginning. Just so you fellows know, ONLY ONE PERSON has asked for the password and they have not participated as far as I know. ALL, every single one, of the regular forum participants have the password already. From looking at the "views" column, a number of people are looking, but are apparently not interested in mixing it up with you guys. As I suspected, not as many people seem to be interested in the kind of discussions that are taking place here as you guys would have thought. But no worries, the playground will stay open, but if you guys would spend less time bellyaching about people having to take a few seconds and request a password, you might find yourself with more time and energy to post something interesting and/or applicable enough for others to react/engage in. Carry on!
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
02-26-2015, 03:36 PM | #691 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
02-26-2015, 03:40 PM | #692 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
02-26-2015, 04:09 PM | #693 | |||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But this is all ok here in Alternative Views. At first I didn't really see it as "alternative" as it's turned out to be, but again, NO PROBLEMO!
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|||
02-26-2015, 08:04 PM | #694 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I'm glad your following the discourse. I've been called a deist before and worse things many times. I don't usually think in terms of deism although I enjoyed reading Thomas Paine very much and would highly recommend him. Deism was an important religious response to Newton's mechanical world. Science has outstripped that world view. So, no I'm not a deist. Insofar as I have faith I am a fideist. My faith comes out of mystical experiences I had including during the time I was in the Local churches. Why do you think I stuck around for 13 years? But, I don't have a fixed dogmatic way of explaining those experiences to myself. And no one is in a better position to explain them then me. So I keep seeking answers. Strange after all these years to still be a learner and a seeker, right? Yet I think God is beyond explanation. So, the most I seem to be able to know of God in this life is through the spirit I am. As Soren Kierkegaard said "Subjectivity is truth."
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
02-26-2015, 11:04 PM | #695 | |||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
That is the case for any phenomena that is not strictly mind-dependent. But the only publicly verifiable or falsifiable can be reality tested. On that criteria hell is no more than an untestable hypothesis. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||||
02-27-2015, 05:28 AM | #696 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
||||
02-27-2015, 06:05 AM | #697 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But in religion, the problem is filtering out the noise that wants to take you where the things you already see would not. Or deciding to change your mind on something. And here we are, somewhat people of The Book because there is a book that we don't fully understand that provides much of the basis of our faith. And part of the problem is deciding what to do about issues like those Dave seems so stuck on from the OT. And there are too many on the inside who are busy focusing on the extremes and parading it as the main thing. Like Jack T. Chick. Just what I need. Another person claiming to speak for my religious/spiritual beliefs — and getting it all wrong. Or at least emphasizing the things that are not my beliefs.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
02-27-2015, 07:41 AM | #698 | |||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|||
02-27-2015, 08:26 AM | #699 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||
02-27-2015, 08:58 AM | #700 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
That is a good point I should have added on to "it's not all that interesting to me" but then again that is why it is not all that interesting to me.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
02-27-2015, 11:18 AM | #701 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||
03-13-2015, 10:13 PM | #702 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Could the fanatical biblicism of contemporary Christian Fundamentalism be a rearguard reaction to the failure of the historical institutional church to safeguard the faith against modernity?
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
03-14-2015, 08:53 AM | #703 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
There is also a fanatical political component to contemporary Christian Fundamentalism in the U.S. and I don't know if you separate the two. There is a strong Christian movement in China but they stand in stark contrast to Christian Fundamentalism in the U.S. While the Chinese Christians associate Christianity in the west with democracy and freedom the Fundamentalists in the U.S. appear to be more interested in the suppression of both freedom and democracy by their insistence on only one belief system in their faith and their politics. In any case, from my standpoint they are both reacting to what they consider to be liberal thought resulting in their decline.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
03-14-2015, 12:45 PM | #704 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
At the same time, I find it interesting that most of fundamentalism is busy using the tools of modernity — pseudo-scientific reasoning and arguments of logic — to fight the effects of those very things on what they understand as the faith. And there is the big problem with that approach. Using science and logic to defend something that is by faith will never be successful in the long run. You either meet Jesus and believe, or you don't and therefore don't. It is not the result of a scientific experiment in which you can prove both God in general, and the Christian faith in specific.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-14-2015, 12:53 PM | #705 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And coupled with that, there is this tendency within so many of those on both extremes, both politically and spiritually, to have a need to appear in agreement on everything. While only the most extreme groups will expel someone for simply questioning something (like the LCM), people are often somewhat cowed into going along with the more extremes because they fear rejection. So while it may not be a truly unified a group as many think, it comes across that way because few will take contrary positions, or even admit to uncertainty on things. Their identity is in the group and they cannot allow themselves to be booted. And being booted might be the best thing that ever happened to them.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-14-2015, 03:36 PM | #706 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
"I do not think it is necessary for Jesus to have thought and spoken of himself in the same terms that his followers thought and spoke of him in the decades subsequent to his crucifixion in order for the convictions of these followers to be treated as valid by Christians today." It also seems to me that today's fundamentalist Christianity is represented (earned or not) by charlatans whether it is Jim Bakker or Mark Driscoll. They have mega churches with several large screens, the best music, the best speakers who give moving messages and they seem to predominate the landscape of Christianity today with a political bias. I am sure there are many others who are represented by well meaning Christian ministers.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-14-2015, 08:44 PM | #707 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
All of Christendom is intoxicated by SAINT Athanasius of Alexandria, the "father of the canon." Yet he resorted to violence and murder to suppress dissent. To him all that disagreed with him were Arians, even if they weren't followers of Arius. Witness Lee was like Athanasius, but was fortunately held back by modern secularism, from Athanasius' extremes. Quote:
And that was the end result of The Five Fundamentals; intolerance of liberalism, modernity, & science. We see this intolerance in all the monotheist religions. ISIS is a prime and current example.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
||
03-15-2015, 06:02 AM | #708 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But while it is easy to point to the OT and declare that the children of Israel were all about wiping out other gods in favor of their own, other than the claiming of the land that they came to call "the good land," their efforts were not aimed at destroying all other gods, but at weeding out other gods from their own worship. And they weren't very good at that until they spent 70+ yeas in exile. The world around them continued in their ways with their own gods. Since that time, we have seen other monotheistic religions go through periods in which they sought to destroy all others. Certain sects within Islam are set on that at this time. And Christians have been the same way at other times. And maybe some are that way now, at least with respect to Islam. Here in the thread on fundamentalism, we are looking at a collection of beliefs that includes those people. And among them are some who are believers. But in what? And in who? I would say in their horses and chariots. In their ability to move a secular government to do their will. Much like some of the early fathers of our faith who burned the writings of their opponents and even had the government imprison them. The call to faithfulness to God is to me, not to me to force upon others. They have to come to their own faith. And having a bunch of bullies pushing it and even making aspects of it into law does not help.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-15-2015, 06:27 AM | #709 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
A favorite blog of mine occasionally posts links to short videos of spoofs on doctrinal and religious issues created by a group that goes by the title "TheLutheranSatire." The fist one is on the Westboro Baptist Church.
Be sure to keep watching when the credits roll because it is not over. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEIqEYP_ZvM This next one is a hoot and talks about the doctrine of the trinity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQLfgaUoQCw
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
03-15-2015, 07:04 AM | #710 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
03-15-2015, 07:20 AM | #711 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||
03-15-2015, 01:27 PM | #712 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I think the spread of Christianity in China or South America is great because of the association with democracy and freedom but in both areas/countries their politics do not reflect the politics of the conservatives in the US who flood fundamentalist Christian churches. Gandhi promoted political action (i.e. liberal political action) but Jesus did not (he did promote peace, love, fairness etc) so I don't see the correlation that Christians attribute to scriptures that give them the impetus for political action for their views. The only "political" aspect of the early Christian church was their unwillingness to accept the pagan gods because of their unified belief in Christ. Anyone who would not believe in the pagan gods would be persecuted but there was no persecution for those who believed in Christ unless they would not accept other gods. Of course, in the OT God authorized and was involved in supporting the extinction of anyone to include their children who did not believe in the God of Israel or adhere to the laws of Israel. Paul zealously went after those who did not believe in the narrow view he had of Christ and God to include urging believers to turn these "unbelievers in Paul's way" over to Satan (i.e. they thought they were believers but not in the way Paul promoted). However, these were individuals in the churches and not the Gentiles in general to whom he preached the gospel. Today, the political social conservative activism which is promoted in Christian churches does not appear to be supported in either the words or actions of the early church.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-15-2015, 04:13 PM | #713 | |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I PERSONALLY don't see any problem with Christians having just as much influence in politics as any other American citizen. Of course by influence I absolutely don't mean the establishment of a theocracy, anymore than influence of non-Christians/agnostics/atheists would necessarily mean the establishment of a Socialist/Marxist/Leninist Utopian paradise. The bottom line is that, for all it's faults, our system of representative government works pretty well. In general, Christians have nothing to fear of non-Christians and vice versa. It's only the wackos on the extremes of either side that cause all the concern for the 80-90% who are relatively centrist.
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|
03-16-2015, 05:02 AM | #714 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Individual Christians should have the liberty to enter the political arena, but i dont like to see ministers use their podium for political agenda. Unfortunately both sides do this.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
03-16-2015, 05:52 AM | #715 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I agree that since we have been given the right to have a voice, we should take advantage of that voice. But it needs to be in sync with the underlying principles of our faith. Since we are talking about the secular government, we should be willing to discuss any issue, but somehow it needs to look more like Jesus discussing with the Romans and the non-Jewish citizens of the areas he visited. Oh, that's right, he essentially did not do any of that. He avoided virtually anything to do with the Roman government. The little he did was to acknowledge that the money was provided by the Romans, so you pay their taxes. I realize that theirs was not a representative democracy. But the times when Jesus got heated about things was when he was talking with the insiders about their living (and even doctrines on a couple of occasions). We need to understand a different approach to "standing as Christians" in the secular government. It can be done. And it will be as representing the positions we think are right. But it cannot be as if we deal with the government and the non-Christian citizens as if they are required to accept our morals and standards or be cursed at. It stands as completely opposite of "love your neighbor as yourself." Get involved. Vote. Go to your precinct meetings. Select your candidates wisely. But remember, when the government actually does very little on the hot-button topics, selecting the "my choice" candidate on those issues at the cost of all the others they may get "wrong" is like signing a pact with the devil to live a few extra years. They tax the $*$&%%@ out of you but they stand against abortion (for example) — something they may never have any say on. I propose that we debate the issues sanely. We use "evidence" that the world will actually listen to. We let the chips fall where they will. If we are right on the issue, it is not ours to judge others outside the faith on. That is God's job and he does not seem to be doing that right now. Those who want to condemn everyone, even the unbelievers, right now are failing miserably at the great commandment. Just like those Westboro chipmunks in the little satire I linked to in an earlier post.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-16-2015, 07:34 AM | #716 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"Exo 22:28 Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people." At first, long ago, I let it go, as just one more among the many matters in the Bible that aren't understandable. Eventually I looked into it. The above quote is from the KJV, that I understand is a great translation because the translators King James used were alcoholics that had no dog in any theological fights, and so just did their job of translating as best they could. Other translations translate it as: (ASV) Thou shalt not revile God, nor curse a ruler of thy people. But Strong's says: [Snippet] 'ĕlôhı̂ym el-o-heem' Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: [End Snippet] So maybe the author didn't intend it but he wrote "gods," and some translators thought he, the author, meant to say "God." But if we take it as the very word of God then God is saying "don't revile the gods." Which is confusing when we consider all the reviling God does toward the gods in all of the rest of the Bible.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|||
03-16-2015, 09:13 AM | #717 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Just to clarify, when you say "Christians" do you mean to include those professing Christians who may not unequivocally subscribe to the 5 fundamentals such as, for example, the so-called mainline Protestants? Or do you limit the appellation "Christian" and thus limit your above statement to apply strictly to Fundamentalists? I read that about half of mainline Protestants describe themselves as liberal and that mainline Christian groups are often more accepting of other beliefs and faiths, affirm the ordination of women, and have become increasingly affirming of gay ordination. Do you see any problem with mainline Christians having just as much influence in politics as any other American citizen?
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
03-16-2015, 11:22 AM | #718 | |||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
First, let me start out by saying that I inadvertently deleted pary of the quote from your prior post that included a bit of what I was responding to.
Quote:
And like the moderate, peaceful Moslems that do not seem willing to stand up against the radicals, those within Christian fundamentalism scarcely will stand up against the radicals in our own midst. The result is that a lot of fundamentalists actually turn away from broader evangelicalism just to be disassociated from fundamentalism. And I'm not sure I blame them. Quote:
For myself, I have positions that are formed by my understanding of God's command. Generally what we understand from the Bible. That means that within the church there is a position concerning the sinfulness of homosexual activity. But I am not asked to condemn unbelievers who don't see it that way. I do not have to refrain from working with them, or even having them as friends. But I cannot partake of those activities. And the church will (should) not tolerate open sin of that type within its fellowship. But that is not the same as condemning the unbelievers who are violating God's laws (not our job). To me they are sin. Assuming that our God is The God, it is ultimately sin to everyone. But the judgment for that sin is not mine to exert. Instead, I have been called to live among all my neighbors just as Jesus did. And he only gave the religious grief for their wrongdoing. In this life, judgement generally does not come. It is in the next that God will do whatever it is that he actually does. Quote:
I note that Paul generally did not condemn the other gods when he spoke to the unbelievers. Only when speaking to the believers do we hear about their falsity. That is the way it should be. We should root them out of our midst. But that does not mean out of the world. Just out of our worship.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|||
03-16-2015, 11:30 AM | #719 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I would have a problem with ordination of an openly professing gay person.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-17-2015, 06:45 AM | #720 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
03-17-2015, 06:50 AM | #721 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Dispositonally I might agree with you, but, even doing nothing has political implications since it is, in effect, a tacit approval of the status quo.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
03-17-2015, 07:02 AM | #722 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
03-17-2015, 08:14 AM | #723 | ||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Despite Scripture’s clear teaching, US White Evangelical Protestants are more likely to have a gun than the US population as a whole. We ask: “what are they trusting for their protection—God or Guns?” What has greater influence on their life—the 2nd Amendment “right to bear arms” or the 2nd great commandment—“love your neighbor as yourself”? He provides clear scripture to base his argument. Actually, based on his article non-Christians have more to fear than Christians. Over the decades the NRA push with Evangelical strong backing has made us the most violent country in the developed world even more than China and countries like Yemen. Overall, developed countries have less per capita homicides, shootings, and people in prisons than the U.S. Nigel goes on to say, "Evangelicals point to God & ethics as the best single preventative measure....Americans in general favor gun controls and mental health measures, while evangelicals favor God and morality. Perhaps we should ask: who’s being more practical?" Quote:
It appears that the U.S. Evangelical Christians use the Bible as the excuse to oppose gun control (we don't need it since we have God), environmental measures (we don't need to do anything about it since we have God), helping the poor through targeted programs such as healthcare (we don't need it because we have God) as well as anything that they don't like often labeling them as "socialism". I agree there are the extremes but it seems like that is where the U.S. Evangelicals stand - at the extreme end of these issues. This is not true for Christians in other countries since many oppose gun control, work towards improving the environment, and support providing healthcare to their population. This is not just the perception as OBW attempted to point out. My wife and I have more than 30 relatives scattered throughout the U.S. who claim to be Evangelical Christians some of which came out of the LC. I have been in contact with them and they are in lockstep with the majority of the U.S. Evangelicals who espouse these positions.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
||
03-17-2015, 09:34 AM | #724 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I don't think gay ministers could be any worse than what I've seen of hetero ministers. Both could be celibate ... or not.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
03-17-2015, 12:39 PM | #725 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I do not know where I fall on the nature v learned behavior v choice spectrum on things like homosexuality. I suspect that it is complicated and that anecdotally we can support a lot of different positions. But no matter how you got there (or got to a point of habitual sex with anyone, or no care for the property and person of others, etc.), Christ does change lives. That may not always mean that there is no more desires. Or no more failure. But there can be a will and a way to refrain because there is a higher power. Whether such a person should be considered for a pastorate is at least somewhat up to those who are to accept such a one as pastor. The question that is problematic is whether there is a blind eye turned to the idea that homosexuality is simply OK as far as the church is concerned, or whether abstinence will be required as a matter of "policy" knowing that people are people and we still sin. The differentiator is a pattern of willful sin v a pattern of abstaining with occasional failure. And even that would not be sufficient for some. It is problematic. It probably is the big issue of the era. And it won't simply be like slavery or women's equality. It will likely reflect the fairly clear command against the practice coupled with continued love for all neighbors, both inside and outside the household of faith.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-17-2015, 01:09 PM | #726 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Gun control may seem to be an irrelevant issue for some, but I think that it is quite enlightening about so many in the fundamentalist, and even evangelical camps. While I can not say that I think that there should be serious gun control, or little gun control, as a constitutional debate (which is all it should be), it is not a matter of God-given rights. As conservative as I am on so much, I still understand that the words written were not in a vacuum and context-less. The right provided in the constitution is granted within the context of having a rapidly available and mobile militia. And in the days when rapid was in months and days rather than hours and minutes, some form of personal protection was generally imperative.
Let's just say that I have no problem with defining down the kinds of weapons a private individual can maintain in their possession. And some limit on the number of such weapons. Outside of the ridiculous images from those movies where the hero carries a duffel bag with 500 pounds of guns and ammo, throwing it around like a sleeping bag, and firing endlessly on every magazine clip, at most you can only deal with one or two. What is an arsenal of 20 - 30 for? But more than that, I find that the idea that there is something God-given about it to be the most disturbing. And people who are instructed to pray for their leaders, whoever they are (Bush, Obama, Putin, etc.), that we may live a peaceable life just seems to run contrary to a need to be anxious to fight. Even if you are not opposed to military action or being called to war, hankering to be ready for it, or even push for it seems to run contrary to the call of the Christian. I begin to think that self-determination, self-help, and self-preservation are our real gods. I am not saying we should not care about our preservation. Neither should we not care about where our next meal comes from. But to always worry about what could go wrong on either account (or many others) suggests little to no faith in God. Replaced by faith in our personal ability to shoot a lot of bullets in a short amount of time. And there are way too many that make this into a religious matter. Generally those in the conservative fundamentalist movements. Some trust in charriotts, and some in assault rifles . . . .
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
03-17-2015, 01:09 PM | #727 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Sounds like you got them both ways -- damned if they do, and damned for tacit approval if they don't.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
03-17-2015, 01:24 PM | #728 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I watched a preacher change from somewhat activist to completely hands-off over 20+ years. Some tried to get him to take positions and his answer was that his congregation was sufficiently divided on political issues for valid reasons and that taking sides where it is not the purpose of the church is to alienate a portion of that congregation for reasons having nothing to do with Christ and the gospel. Encourage everyone to make informed decisions and vote. Or even get involved if they are inclined to go further. But where and how they do that is not a matter of Christian imperative. That is not any kind of approval of the status quo. Besides, if we are to pray for the government, then that includes the one that is headed by Obama just as much as the previous one headed by Bush. And it would have included the one that could have been headed by a Mormon. Or a Hindu, Moslem, or atheist (thinking somewhat globally now, not just US-centric). There are cheers and jeers on all sides. And it may be the political preference of the individual. But it is not the way of the church.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-17-2015, 01:27 PM | #729 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
On the other hand, those who can protect themselves are much less fearful, and often more willing to befriend a stranger -- kind of like Southern hospitality. Tomes' question is completely bogus to me. Living in a multicultural, megapolis like Toronto he has no way to relate with rural America. Loving God and loving your neighbor have nothing to do with outdoor sports. like hunting or fishing. Nearly every country Christian I know has hunting weapons. It's a way of life which liberal big city slickers will never understand. Neither will they ever understand the brotherly love one will find among these brothers and sisters. And what "clear scriptural teaching" is Tomes referring to anyways?
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-17-2015, 01:46 PM | #730 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
It has been said that we all have a line drawn on the ground. Ones like Tomes can all claim to be peace-loving, supporters of gun-control, until their "line" is crossed. Then let me see who calmly sits still when 911 fails and the thugs outside decide they want to "play" with your wife and daughters.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-17-2015, 04:15 PM | #731 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-17-2015, 04:58 PM | #732 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-17-2015, 06:35 PM | #733 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Politics is a category of human activity. So both political action and inaction have political consequences. Inaction may be due to complacency or a sense of powerlessness as well as approval but, whatever it is due to, it has political consequences and it serves those in power.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
03-17-2015, 08:02 PM | #734 | |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
As to your last statement, you are wrong as much as anybody can be wrong. But then again, I don't know how a relativist like you views who is a genuine Christian, and somebody who just says they are a Christian. What is your standard for who qualifies as "a Christian"? You know mine. THE BIBLE. But given the way that you post here on this website, I am wouldn't be surprised if you view a Zen Buddhist as a Christian...that is if he says he is a Christian. "unsaved Christian".....do you really believe there is such a thing? Wow. Welcome to the la la land of Alt Views! Just sayin.....
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|
03-17-2015, 08:16 PM | #735 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Agreeing or disagreeing about gun control only takes us down the rabbit hole. Nigel's point was that the US White Evangelicals are driving this in the US even though it is not supported by the majority of the US citizens or the mainline Christians. It just wasn't his opinion, he was quoting a survey that showed this outcome and he was reacting to it. He is speaking as an elder at the Church in Toronto. There is nothing to support the right to bear arms in the Bible. Can you imagine Paul saying in his letter to the Romans, "each of you gather a sword for your households in case the emperor decides to kill you and fight them to the death."? At the time they were being martyred and not resisting death once they were headed to that end. In other words, God was enough. It was an honor to be martyred not that he was recommending it. It would be helpful to read the letters from Polycarp or Paul for that matter since many of his letters were written while he was in custody of the Romans.
In the article Tomes states, "Personally, I feel that the Bible is clear on the issue of guns. Jesus told Pilate, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.” (John 18:36). Jesus prohibited his disciples from fighting, even defensively. He told Peter, “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword.” (Matt. 26:52) This principle ought to be extended from “swords” to other weapons—handguns, semi-automatic guns, etc. Jesus’ disciples were told to “turn the other cheek” (Matt. 5:39) and flee, rather than fight, in the face of persecution—“When they persecute you in one town, flee to the next…” (Matt. 10:23) This latter principle was practiced by the Apostle Paul (2 Cor. 11:33). The US Evangelicals are driving this anti-gun control in their support of the NRA. Even though we try to strengthen laws to identify people who are problems from obtaining guns there are so many gun shows and gun stores to include Walmart that there is no way of stopping this. If someone thinks that loading up on military weapons agains the US military will stop them they are just kidding themselves. You will need anti-tank weapons, anti-drone missiles, etc. It's crazy thinking and it has just led this country down a dark chapter. I used to be a hunter when I was younger but haven't owned a gun in decades but I don't see the need. In any case, the constitution's 2nd amendment was not written with the idea that after we established a democracy there would be this proliferation of weapons in the US but again debating this issue leads us down the rabbit hole. The problem as Nigel stated it is with the US White Evangelicals and their fervor for guns but as I indicated this was just an example of one issue. The US Evangelicals are politically and socially trying to manipulate numerous issues which contrast with the majority of the Evangelicals in the rest of the developed world. There is a common denominator, Jesus and the inerrancy of the Bible, but beyond this the US White Evangelicals roam in their own world.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
03-18-2015, 03:36 AM | #736 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
US White Evangelicals? You sound both racist, bigoted, and prejudiced. I just love the way you can find verses to support your UU positions, while at the same time rejecting the heart of God's word.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-18-2015, 05:25 AM | #737 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Let me start by saying that while I actually agree with a lot of what you are saying about these things, you come across like the liberal version of foam-at-the-mouth that the fundamentalist whackos are. Not equal, but somewhat.
Quote:
Sorry, but you got some splaining to do. Jesus is not the problem. He is one of the flags that they wrap themselves in. But it is his restraint from immediate judgment that the error does not cost them their lives. It is a form of blasphemy to say that Jesus is for their actions. Both by them and by you. Jesus is not part of it. Fallen man, probably influenced by the cares of the world and even its lord, Satan, is all there is in the thing. I can buy into the inerrant Bible as a problem. Not because I think there is error in the Bible, but because of what inerrancy means to so many. And what it means has nothing to do with the truth in the Bible, but in a false assertion that whatever man is doing and saying about the Bible is correct (no matter how wrong they may be).
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-18-2015, 05:32 AM | #738 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
US White Evangelicals. This was a term Nigel Tomes used in his article I quoted: http://churchintoronto.blogspot.com/...uns-glory.html I was only quoting him. Honestly, he does not seem racist, bigoted or prejudiced and I don't think he was using the term in that sense since he was quoting a survey which used that terminology. The verses I quoted were from Nigel Tomes' article (see above link). I never received the impression that he was UU nor that he was rejecting the heart of God. You're seeing something that I just don't see in his article.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-18-2015, 05:48 AM | #739 | ||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
||
03-18-2015, 08:21 AM | #740 | ||||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
According to the parable of the wheat and the tares, who Christ accepts won't be revealed until the day of judgment. So, it seems we don't know who to accept. Of course, we are taught to know them by their fruit, but that is basically a practical judgment call rather than anything definitive. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||||||
03-18-2015, 08:39 AM | #741 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Good argument. Gun advocacy is unchristian and anti-faith. Quote:
Quote:
True enough. I've never owned a gun. Miraculously I have survived to age 65. God be praised! Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||||
03-18-2015, 08:42 AM | #742 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Got that bro Zeek? For God so loved the world, that he gave it the Bible, that whosoever believeth in it should not perish, but have everlasting life. Just for the record. If being a Christian means turning the Bible into an idol then I'm not a Christian.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|||
03-18-2015, 08:47 AM | #743 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Neither do I think the Bible is "so clear" on this hotbed topic of guns. In the "Recovery" book of Nehemiah, the returning Israelites were instructed to "work with one hand and a sword (weapon) in the other." When the Lord was crucified, of course He instructed the disciples not to resist. He was then the Lamb of God, "He was oppressed and He was afflicted, Yet He did not open His mouth; Like a lamb that is led to slaughter, And like a sheep that is silent before its shearers, So He did not open His mouth." But this is all beside the point. Where oh where do we see these terrible and fundamental evangelistics advocating the use of guns to start a war? You are as guilty as Tomes and all the other liberal pundits of creating this straw man. Coinciding with this is connecting peace-loving, law-abiding, patriotic, fundamental Christians with the right-wing skin-head militia types. Liberal media loves to do this. When that Fort Hood Mooslim army Psychiatrist went on a rampage yelling "Allah is great," they actually called it "work place violence." Just imagine if some Baptist Preacher had done the same thing. Nigel Tomes went off on his blogger tirade after the Sandy Hook school shooting. In one fell swoop he bashed Americans, evangelical Christians, sportsmen, Republicans, and conservatives. The shooter Adam Lanza was a nut case who lived on a diet of video game violence in his darkened basement. His mother, being none of the above except a naive American, filled the house with guns and ammo and taught her son how to use them. Bad idea. Please Nigel get your facts straight. I know you can do it.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-18-2015, 12:22 PM | #744 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Yes, Jesus is a link. But not the link that makes it all go wrong. When I think of where fundamentalists, US White Evangelicals, US Black Evangelicals, and others go wrong, it is in propping up a form of Jesus, along with their version of the Bible (as interpreted and viewed as inerrant), and make it dance for them. We/they want God and the Bible to support our insistence on: capitalism manifest destiny supremacy most god-favored nation status the 2nd amendment And so on. But allow God and the Bible to rule us and convert us into obedient lovers of our neighbors (including the gay, Moslem, Hindu, atheist, etc.)? Never!!
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-18-2015, 01:24 PM | #745 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I got a few stories I could tell about loving my neighbors here in CrazyTown, USA. Just the other day, my neighbor stopped by to apologize to me. His life spun out of control with drugs and he landed in prison. It was hard for him to come to our door all humbled and say he's sorry and hopes to repay us one day. We hugged and thanked him, blessing him with the Lord. It takes the love of God to love our neighbors. Some have robbed us. One stole our guest's dog. One accuses me of being a slave owner. We have been attacked repeatedly by their dogs. One called the police for having Christian meetings. But don't accuse me of not loving them. Or their kids.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-18-2015, 01:31 PM | #746 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Here in Kentucky the three "G's" aren't God, Guns, and Glory, but rather, God, Guns and Gays. That's their big concerns, and why Kentucky voted for McCain and Palin (cuz the democrats want to take our guns ... and they support gay marriage). And just to also add, I've been told by some Christian Kentuckians: "I don't want no nigger as my president." And I don't think these Kentucky evangelicals are fringe fundamentalists. God, Guns, and Gays ... seems to be their core concerns politically ... with some adding the double "g" - as in n*gg*r. Those are the 5-G white evangelicals.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-18-2015, 04:02 PM | #747 | |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Nothing influences the corporate morality (moral atmosphere) of a secular country or society than the political/legal system. In my opinion, "Separation of Church and State" works both ways - there should be no establishment of a State Church (ie The Church of England) but neither should any religious person be discouraged (much less banned) from exercising their rights, from simply voting for the candidate/issue of their choice, all the way to entering the political arena.
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|
03-18-2015, 04:05 PM | #748 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Or at least I had no reason to think you were. I was busy making comments on people who are wrapped in a faux theology of American economics, privilege, and a God-given constitution which we need to preach as a gospel to the world. I would be surprised to find you among those.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-18-2015, 04:08 PM | #749 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-18-2015, 07:20 PM | #750 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I couldn't let this post just pass by without remarking.
Quote:
Great post. Way to drive a critical point home.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-18-2015, 08:11 PM | #751 | ||||||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
||||||
03-19-2015, 06:19 AM | #752 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Can someone who was truly saved (e.g. in their history they had a born again experience, brought many people to Christ, devoted to the Bible etc) get unsaved from your perspective?
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-19-2015, 07:29 AM | #753 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Since you state that the Gospels clearly and plainly delineate who is and who is not a Christian, you must know who is and who is not. So, would you please stop beating around the bush and clearly and plainly state it here. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||||
03-19-2015, 07:47 AM | #754 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Define exactly what a human being is, and then we can discuss what exactly a Christian is ...
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-19-2015, 09:00 AM | #755 | ||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I already answered zeek about this. Of course you guys don't like the answer so the little game of cat and mouse continues. You can call your pet hamster a "Christian" if you want. Knock yourself out! But your furry little friend won't qualify as a Christian ACCORDING TO THE CLEAR AND PLAIN DECLARATIONS OF JESUS CHRIST, and HIS definition is the only one that should count. You are seeking a "flesh and blood" definition from me... sorry to disappoint you Dave, but you are not going to get one from me for the simple reason I couldn't care less about such definitions - I don't have the time or interest to haggle over such things, and most importantly they are irrelevant to the issues surrounding the teachings and practices of the Local Church of Witness Lee. What you are missing is the fact that being a Christian, a genuine follower of Jesus Christ, involves more than just faith and belief in his Word (although these are crucial) it also involves revelation. Simon Peter was not thinking about whether the words of Jesus Christ were inerrant or even God-inspired, per se, when he proclaimed "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God!" Jesus Christ's reaction is the key to my point though: Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven.(John 16:17) Notice how the revelation was not based on believing in the virgin birth, or that Jesus Christ descended from the line of David, or even that Jesus Christ was going to lead the Tea Party to a grand victory over those terrible Romans - No, the revelation was that He was the Son of the living God, and it was that very living God, the One and Only True God of Heaven and Earth, that revealed this wonderful and life-changing revelation to Peter. Although we don't have Jesus Christ here in flesh and blood to ask every man that all important, all crucial question "But who do you say that I am?" We have the His Word, and it is plain and it is clear - ""for unless you believe that I am he you will die in your sins"(John 8:24) Now you can call into question whether or not Jesus Christ really said this, or that maybe the writers of the Gospels fudged on the wording, or that Jesus Christ was a figment of their imaginations...it all won't really matter because you have short-circuited any chance of receiving the revelation that He is the Christ, the Son of the living God. Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
||
03-19-2015, 10:42 AM | #756 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
What makes you think I'm looking for flaws or exceptions? UntoHim stated that what a Christian is is clearly and plainly delineated. If so, it should be no problem for him to clearly and plainly delineate it without flaw or exception. Apparently you don't think it's that easy. If so, I'm inclined to agree with you. Nevertheless, lets give UntoHim a chance. Maybe he has the clear, plain and final answer.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
03-19-2015, 12:19 PM | #757 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Right now we're following UntoHim down his rabbit hole, and so far it seems all he's shown us is the Mad Hatter, but not what makes a Christian a real Christian. And I know UntoHim is better than this.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-19-2015, 02:15 PM | #758 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
1. I only heard of Ehrman about 3-4 months ago from one of my cohorts who is not named zeek but while I found his works very interesting he has not changed my overall perspective at all. Ehrman's breakthrough 1993 text-critical scholarly study, The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture, has been heralded by Evangelical Christian scholars world-wide as illuminating and revelatory even though they may disagree with the direction he has taken in his personal life. He wrote the popular version of this book in Misquoting Jesus which has created a great deal of chagrin in the Christian world. I wish it was as simple as two versions of the suicide of Judas. 2. I wasn't looking for a definition but simply a statement of yes or no with a simple explanation or detailed definition if you like. I thought your hamster example was funny even though irrelevant unless you want to start a "hamster Christian" thread. Humor is important in this discussion. 3. Based on what you said about John 16:17 why do you make a big deal about the Trinity, the inerrancy of the Bible etc. Why not just have the revelation which Peter had as the litmus test for a Christian and that is the end? It seems like many of us have had that "revelation" but still had more expectations which gets us to WL for ongoing revelation and training. After leaving WL...we continue to seek "revelation" which is apparently why you are where you are presently. 4. You recommended that others check out their local Acts 29 church on the internet as a possibility after their experience in the LC in a 7/2011 post you made so I am glad that you have found something that works for you. I presume you subscribe to their belief regarding the inerrancy of the Bible or do they promote each person to exercise their own beliefs in this regard?
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-19-2015, 02:55 PM | #759 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Was the thief a Christian? Was the thief saved? Did the thief believe the Bible was inerrant? Did the thief believe the Bible was God-inspired? Could he be saved without quoting the five tenets of fundamentalism? How could he be saved as a convicted criminal, "cursed by hanging on a tree." (Deut 21.23) How could he be saved having never been baptized? Did he have the correct theology of the Trinity? So many questions! Who can answer them all! What if things were reversed for the thief. What if Luke 23.40-43 had occurred before Matt 27.44? Was our poor thief then unsaved? Was he truly born again in the first place? Will he still go to paradise or heaven? What if he brought the other thief to the Lord first, and then backslid before he died by renouncing the Lord? (Matt 18.20) Can an unsaved thief still be with Jesus in paradise? What if he wasn't in paradise, did Jesus then lie? Perhaps Jesus misspoke about paradise? Was that the good side of paradise with Abraham, (Luke 16) or the thirsty side with the rich man? So many questions! Who can answer them all! Brother UntoHim can you help me?
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-19-2015, 04:26 PM | #760 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
We know so little. Where did that thief go? Was he Jesus' sidekick thru Hades? I don't think he resurrected with Jesus. And what is paradise? In the end bro UntoHim can't say and can't know who are or are not Christians. Only those that know the hearts can know such things. So best not be pointing fingers at those we think are Christian in name only. That's so Witness Lee like. We'll pray for our bro UntoHim, that he'll soon get over his Witness Lee infection.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-19-2015, 05:20 PM | #761 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But we can know concerning ourself. And we must know. And we can know. I John makes that clear.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-19-2015, 06:29 PM | #762 | |||||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|||||
03-19-2015, 07:40 PM | #763 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Bart Ehrman gave up his faith over the death of Judas?
Read the accounts again. They are not contradictory. I always understood it as Judas hung himself, and when he fell down his guts spilled out. Since the chief priests used his 30 pieces of silver to buy the potter's field in Matt 27.5-10, Acts 1.18-20 indicates that Judas paid for it with the wages of unrighteousness, and thus fulfilled the prophecy in Psalms 69.25.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
03-20-2015, 05:20 AM | #764 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-20-2015, 07:17 AM | #765 | |||||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I am not trying to dodge your question but just as you are trying to explain who a Christian is from your perspective I am trying to explain why I am not a Christian based on your definition. In the first place even if I believed that the Bible was inerrant and God inspired why do I have to adhere to the way you have interpreted it. Aren't I afforded the opportunity to have my own revelation of what the Bible says of Jesus, God etc or must I review my revelation in relation to what you have determined it to be? If that is the case then how can anyone have any revelation and isn't that the problem we all had with Witness Lee. I don't believe there is a standard definition of a Christian. From my perspective the definition of a Christian is not wrapped up in a neat little package. I can hear your response now...."Okay Dave, since you don't believe in my definition or shall I say the standard Christian Evangelical definition what is your definition if I can be so bold to ask for the umpteenth time?" Here is my response: A Christian is someone who experiences Christ, subscribes to the values of that experience but the experience is not based on belief in any dogma or doctrine. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I would appreciate you testing the spirits of all of those so called US Evangelical Christians mentioned by Tomes--- You may well find a considerable number of wolves in sheep clothing but then again, what do I know. Of course, I am sure there are sincere Christians among this group as well. Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|||||
03-20-2015, 09:22 AM | #766 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
If we're gonna call the mistakes and additions to the manuscripts inspired words of God then when we locked the NT by canonizing it we are quenching the Spirit from further inspiration in continuing to write scripture, thru those that wish to add more inspiration to the inspired words of God. So canonizing the NT has stopped God from continuing to speak to us, thru additional mistakes and modifications -- stopping Him in the middle of His work -- and who knows what He wants to speak to us today? We'll never know. So all we end up with is a rough draft of the NT, that God wanted to change, and did thru the ages, and now we're not letting Him complete His rough draft, started 2000 yrs ago. Thanks Gutenberg. The printing press killed the living Words of God. Christians condemned Nietzsche for doing that. But not a peep about Gutenberg. It looks to me that: All of Christendom is la la land. (and don't make me drag out the Holy Foreskin, to prove my point). If I were God I'd set my Kingdom up on the moon, or in some other galaxy. We're a lost cause. Our only hope is that, for no damn good reason, that I can make heads or tails of, God so loved the world. He must see something I don't see ... or has a blind spot ... and prolly wants to, needs to, write more scripture. We frustrate our own real and actual survival. The Bible, as it exists -- unfinished -- is gonna be the death of us.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-20-2015, 09:42 AM | #767 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Really? How do we go about doing that? How is the problem of salvation not basically a matter of faith?
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
03-20-2015, 09:50 AM | #768 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
"Whoever believes..." (Mark 16:16), "for unless you believe..."(John 8:24) Why do you have a problem acknowledging that faith not knowledge is the foundation of Christianity?
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
03-20-2015, 10:07 AM | #769 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Somehow you got the impression that faith means blind ignorance. The Bible is not that way. You should try reading it instead of guys like Bart Ehrman.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
03-20-2015, 12:07 PM | #770 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Click on image to view the world's foremost top Biblical Scholar that knows more than anyone else ... but has a fixation on the contradictions of Judas' death:
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-20-2015, 01:04 PM | #771 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
It seems to me, that Christianity is primarily a matter of faith not knowledge. Of course, much depends upon what one means by faith and knowledge. To me, faith is subjective. By knowledge, I'm referring to objective knowledge. If by knowledge one means subjective experience, then faith can be considered a kind of knowledge as well. Now out of faith, a person can live a life that can be observed and measured objectively in terms of its fruit or works. Thus, Christianity can become the object of knowledge too. But, faith is primary. Obviously you may agree or disagree with my assessment. But, I am presenting my understanding to you in a straight forward manner for your consideration.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
03-20-2015, 05:45 PM | #772 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
"For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the cleverness of the clever I will set aside. Where is the wise? Where is the scholar? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made the wisdom of this world into nonsense? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world by its wisdom has not known God, it was God's good pleasure through the foolishness of the preaching, to save them that believe."
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-21-2015, 08:19 AM | #773 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Great verse tho ... a reference to Isaiah 29:14. And I think it drives home Zeek's point. That it's all by faith ... and can't be logically explained. Is that a cop-out, like UntoHim claims? Of course not. When I look back over my life it appears to me that all along the way God pulled the rug out from under everything I thought I knew over and over again, until, I have nothing else to place my faith in but God. Isn't that the point from the get-go? Isn't that where we began with God? Why is faith considered a cop out? I don't get it. I can't depend on "the wisdom of the wise, and the cleverness of the clever." What's left? If I can't depend on faith I have nothing at all to depend upon. I was raised in fundamentalism. And as far back as I can remember it's always been about faith. That's a fact you can take to the bank. Bro O, you asked me why I don't defend the faith. Well, I just did.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-21-2015, 12:54 PM | #774 | ||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I would never doubt your sincerity in attempting to place your faith in God, but without belief in and faith in Jesus Christ and God's Word, I'm afraid you are short-circuiting any way to come to the One and Only true God. Jesus said "no one comes to the Father except through me" (John 14:6) This declaration is very straight-forward, not requiring any interpretation...what it does require is faith and obedience. For one to say that they have faith in God but reject His only begotten Son is a non-sequitur, and a dangerous one for your spiritual health. Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
||
03-21-2015, 05:50 PM | #775 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Congratulations UntoHim. That's pure faith. There isn't an objective verifiable or falsifiable fact in that entire post.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
03-21-2015, 07:11 PM | #776 |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Jesus said to him, “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” (John 20:29)
So zeek, my dear friend. Do you believe? (Watch this my Alt View fellows!)
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
03-21-2015, 07:58 PM | #777 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I guess we all have our funny ways about God ; our funny requirements, sticklers, fetishes, and proclivities ; that we think God requires. And yes, such things require the requisite faith to match those determinants. The more we pile on the more faith we have to work up. UntoHim asks: "Where is the description of what you are to have faith in?" I thought I plainly said "faith in God." Is that not a description? Isn't that enough? I guess not enough for UntoHim. He requires "faith in Jesus Christ and God's Word," both equally. And more, "faith in the One and Only true God, the Creator of Heaven and Earth, His Only begotten Son, Jesus Christ who died for our sins and rose from the dead and faith that God's Spirit will transform us into the likeness of Christ ..." Gosh! All the mechanics. That's a lot to keep up with; seems very cumbersome. If I'm gonna put faith in all that, I may as well simplify it, and believe in, once saved always saved, and I'll save myself a lot of work. I may have been able to jump thru all those loops and hoops when I was young -- oh yeah, I did that in the local church -- but I'm too old for all that now. I'd rather these days to just rock my soul in the bosom of Abraham. If that's not enough for God then He's just way too demanding. UntoHim just seems to be hung up on a demanding Father figure ... that requires that we jump thru all kinds of loops and hoops ... like trained seals. To each his, or her, own ... I guess.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
||
03-21-2015, 09:47 PM | #778 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Yes. Watch what?
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
03-22-2015, 06:52 AM | #779 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I'm still watching. Did I miss it?
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
03-22-2015, 08:48 AM | #780 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
It reminds me of the old "watch this space" joke. Perhaps UntoHim is playing games. Ethically, our primary responsibility is to treat each other well. How are we doing? The question, "What would Jesus do?" assumes that Jesus is an absolutely righteous person. So the question could be rephrased, "What would a perfectly good and ethical person do in this situation? Thus, it is, categorically, an absolute ethical imperative. In the sphere of discussion, it demands that we treat everyone as a "thou"--a potential if not actual "son of God". That would entail at least treating others with respect, wouldn't you think? I don't feel I'm getting much of that here. How am I doing?
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
03-22-2015, 11:59 AM | #781 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Here's an article about the dominionist variety of fundamentalism:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh235.htm
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
03-22-2015, 02:35 PM | #782 | |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
You keep harping on this "faith is not knowledge" deal. Please point me to where anyone has said such a thing. There is such a thing as "the knowledge of God", but this is knowledge as in knowing a person. Although we do obtain objective knowledge (from the Bible) about God, his nature, character, ways and purposes, it is the subjective, intimate knowledge of God the leads to full salvation. And this is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.(John 17:3) Your post I quoted above is condescending and in a mocking tone. Is this your "alternative view" of civil discussion? You can have the last word on faith verses knowledge if you want.
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|
03-22-2015, 03:40 PM | #783 | |||||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
I have to assume it's not the God of the Bible, you've made that crystal clear over the years. So if it's not the God of the Bible, then what god are you saying you have faith in? And don't worry about being off topic, you know that you have a lifetime get-out-of-jail card...that is if you haven't lost the darn thing! Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|||||
03-22-2015, 09:27 PM | #784 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-23-2015, 03:07 AM | #785 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
"Keeping faith and a good conscience, which some have rejected and suffered shipwreck in regard to their faith. Among these are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan, so that they will be taught not to blaspheme."
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-23-2015, 04:09 AM | #786 | ||||||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
||||||||
03-23-2015, 04:09 AM | #787 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Dup post - fell asleep and finished it while sleeping ... must have been the spirit moving ... er sompin ...
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
03-23-2015, 04:57 AM | #788 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And to the angel of the church in Sardis....I know your works; you have a name of being alive, but you are dead... And to the angel of the church in Laodicea....I know your works; you are neither cold nor hot. I wish that you were either cold or hot. So, because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I am about to spit you out of my mouth. For you say, I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing. You do not realize you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked...Rev. 3:1-2, 14-17 Neither on this forum nor in person do I pretend to be something I am not.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-23-2015, 05:47 AM | #789 | |||||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||||||
03-23-2015, 06:16 AM | #790 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
This is exactly how I view many of the responses here. No one responds to actual comments, and when they do its this condescending know-it-all attitude that kills the discussion. I can relate to all of UntoHim's posts and replies. He goes out of his way to provide thoughtful and scriptural responses that just get ridiculed. The truths of the Bible get mocked, and renowned atheists like Ehrman get recommended. What can be more "substantive" than God's own word, properly applied to the current situation?
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
03-24-2015, 05:56 AM | #791 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
03-24-2015, 02:10 PM | #792 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-25-2015, 08:26 AM | #793 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
We're talking fundamentalism here. And Christian dominionism is fundamentalism on steroids. Dominionism is the Taliban of fundamentalism. They literally want America to be a theocracy, with OT type laws (stoning and such). And they are not without sway and power. Sen. Ted Cruz recently announced his run for president, at the fundamentalist Liberty University. I certainly don't wish to drag this forum, or this thread, into the mud and dirt of politics. But Cruz is a Christian Dominionist, that's put his hat into the ring for president. Now I doubt Cruz has a chance in Palin of becoming president. It's just an example of how extreme Christian fundamentalism is embedded in our nation and culture ... and that's scary.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-25-2015, 08:45 AM | #794 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Why is it that some of the posters are morbidly afraid of anything fundamental, yet see Mooslims as a pleasant change. Several times when mentioning the religion of the white house to my liberal friends, I get a comment like, "Oh I have a Mooslem friend, she is so nice and loving, the sweetest girl I ever met, and she doesn't judge anyone for their beliefs." Why is it that the posters here don't say the same thing? "Oh I have a fundamental Christian friend, she is so nice and loving, the sweetest girl I ever met, and she doesn't judge anyone for their beliefs."
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-25-2015, 02:43 PM | #795 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
So comments about Moslems in general is like talking about the first group of fundamentalists, or even avoid fundamentalists and talking about evangelicals that are not within the "fundamentalist" camp. But there are Moslems that are seriously fundamentalist. Just like there are Christians in the same kinds of camps. Just many fewer who want to strap on bomb vests and other off-the-wall extremist things. They (the Christian kind) have a different kind of extremism since they like the idea of just turning the Middle-East sand to glass through military action. I can't go for that although I am not some pacifist calling for the nation to simply turn the other cheek. Within Christianity, when talking about the fundamentalists, the phrase "a fundamental Christian friend" and "who doesn't judge anyone for their beliefs" almost don't belong in the same sentence. That is because we are not talking about the original fundamentalists, but the current ones that are active in the latest version of the Moral Majority. Of course, within the softer side of fundamentalism, it is still difficult to find those who do not "judge anyone for their beliefs." That is the whole purpose. To stand for something you think everyone else is missing. And make sure they know what it is that separates you. The only way you get the two thoughts into the same sentence, or even into the thinking of the same person, is when they hold to the "fundamentals" for themselves but understand that not everyone sees it the way they do and believe that the only true issue is faith in Christ. Not very fundamentalist when you get down to it.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-25-2015, 03:20 PM | #796 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
If I hear the word "fundamental," it is in a positive connotation, and usually indicates that person focuses on the important items of the faith, rather than getting preoccupied with meany items. It is only in the media where I hear about "fundamentalists," which likes to paint Christians into the same corner as Mooslem jihadists.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-25-2015, 05:12 PM | #797 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I respect your position which I regard as based on faith. Personally I view the Bible as the "Word of God" as a metaphor. Word in this context is itself a figurative not literal since obviously the Bible is composed by numerous words written by numerous authors. In this context Word seems to mean "expression". The article the signifies that the expression is unique. So, the Bible is considered to be the unique written expression of God. It is, most Christians would agree a sacred and foundational document. It is, none-the-less a human document that bears the historical, cultural and scientific marks of its time. If we suppose that God is present and somehow working in the world, then we don't we consider that He has continued to reveal Himself through historical events and through persons. So that, just as the concept of God evolved from the beginning to the end of the Bible, so has the concept of God continued to evolve since then? Thus, the conception of God evolved from the time the last book of the New Testament was written until the time of the Nicene Councils. And it has evolved since. Most recently has been the globalization of the great world religions cannot help but transform the human understanding of God in ways that the Bible writers could not possibly have conceived. During Biblical times, the tribal and national ethics under the prophets, and later under the nations who conquered them, most significantly of all under the Romans when governance of the diverse ethnic groups of the Mediterranean, Asia and African. During those times when Christianity arose the consciousness of a possible universal ethics arose and took hold of a wider population resulting in both syncretism and emerging Christian and Jewish orthodoxies. How much more, during this information age can we expect the conceptions of the divine and ethics to change?
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
03-25-2015, 07:22 PM | #798 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-26-2015, 06:44 AM | #799 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
1) The Christians that blow up abortion clinics, or kill the doctors. 2) The Christian Identity, that Tim McVeigh was a member of, that, blew up the Oklahoma Federal building, back in 1995. 3) And Christians that go to Israel to blow up the temple mount, or are infected with the Jerusalem Syndrome to the point of supporting such efforts (like John Hagee). There may be more, I don't know -- and none of these, but maybe Hagee, could be considered fundamentalists. Still to be fair, Christian fundamentalists are not renown for blowing themselves up to kill innocents, or for cutting off heads. That crown, at present, goes only to one of the monotheist world religions: the Muslim fundamentalists. They take that cake. But Christian fundamentalists can proudly count one extremest in their camp: Erik Prince, multi-millionaire founder of the infamous Blackwater; that could be considered America's Christian crusader, killing with impunity for the Christian version of God. Fortunately fundamentalism in all forms don't represent the main of any of the religions they are considered to be a part of. Fundamentalism is I think by nature a fringe group of all religions. Thank God for that.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-26-2015, 07:52 AM | #800 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I respect your position which I regard as based on faith. To me the Bible as the "Word of God" is a metaphor. Word in this context is itself figurative not literal since obviously the Bible is composed by numerous words written by numerous authors. In this context Word seems to mean "expression". The article the signifies that the expression is unique. So, the Bible is considered to be the unique written expression of God. It is, most Christians would agree, a sacred and foundational document. It is, none-the-less a human document that bears the historical, cultural and scientific marks of its time. If we believe that God is present and working in the world, then we don't suppose that He has discontinued revealing Himself through historical events and persons when the Bible was compiled. So that, just as the concept of God evolved from the beginning to the end of the Bible, so does the concept of God continue to evolve as God reveals Himself though history. Thus, the conception of God evolved from the time the last book of the New Testament was written until the time of the Nicene Councils. And it has continued to evolve since. Most recently the globalization of the great world religions cannot help but transform the human understanding of God in ways that the Bible writers could not possibly have conceived. During Biblical times, the tribal and national ethics were transformed by the prophets, and later the nations who conquered Israel. Most significant of all was the social, ethical and political effects of the Romans on the diverse ethnic groups of the Mediterranean, Asia and Africa. During late antiquity the consciousness of a possible universal ethics arose and took hold of a wider population resulting in both syncretistic mystery cults and emerging Christian and Jewish orthodoxies. How much more, during this information age can we expect the conceptions of the divine and ethics to change? [corrected for grammar]
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
03-26-2015, 08:59 AM | #801 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Those who target abortion clinics or their butchers have something entirely different in mind. Their goal is to protect the most defenseless members of society, the unborn, who have no way to defend themselves. It was the rotten Roe ruling which legitimized this slaughter. Take a look at that law and you will see all the corruption, lies, false science, and deceit that went into it. What if one day our court system approved the extermination of "obese" people under social ObamaCare for the betterment of society as a whole. Where would you side on this matter? It would then be criminal to fight back or defend these obese "burdens" on a healthy society. Surely many Christians would rise up in protest, while other more liberal Christians would condemn them for getting involved with politics in the first place. Would you just go along with a law that simply justifies the murder of innocents? What if you happened to be overweight?
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-26-2015, 11:10 AM | #802 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I get your distinction between jihadists & abortion clinic bombers. Abortion bombers don't get virgins, heavenly wine, and hashish. They get a boring heaven, with only harps, wings, and halos. Just kidding, of course. Killing (for any reason) is not among either the original five fundamentals, nor even in our expended list of 20 fundamentals. But since the first fundamental is the inerrant Bible, maybe it should be ; not of just fat people, but of men, women, children, babies, and even fetuses, if God commands it, which He did in Biblical times. And the right defenders of the unborn should be the parents, not some psycho Bible crazed killing stranger.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-26-2015, 12:15 PM | #803 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
In our promiscuous society teen girls are regularly "counseled" to abort the "unwanted" while the father of the child and her parents have little or no say about it. Why do you label those who protest abortions as "some psycho Bible crazed killing stranger." Why can't they be characterized as upstanding citizens who care for the indefensible unborn? There was a time in man's history, up until 1973 in fact, when this was exactly the case. 7 liberals on the SCOTUS changed all that for us. What if these "upstanding citizens" decided that the old laws of the land were better? We have been convinced that unwanted children are disposable just as Hitler convinced his people that Jews, Gays, and Gypsies were. What will you do when the future SCOTUS decides Christians are disposable, as has happened in numerous countries? Recently the US celebrated some Boston Tea Party event. But think about it, these rebels broke laws, they killed people, they destroyed property, and they were condemned as criminals, but today we call them heroes of our young nation. Just depends on whether you were British or not. I'm not advocating any action here, but for once try to get another point of view. Try to understand what is happening without marginalizing them with liberal generalities and stereotypes starting with "Bible crazed." Why is it that you always characterize Christians in the worst possible light? Have you anything nice to say about God's people?
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-26-2015, 03:54 PM | #804 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
We have a different view of where the line is drawn concerning what we can do righteously. If we had lived in the 1st century surronding the Mediterranean Sea, there was a lot that was allowable and practiced that would make abortions misdemenors. (I'm having to skip my spell check, so it might not read right). Under this modern kind of thinking, the church should have been spearing all kinds of people (including non-Christians). That kind of justice is God's to mete out.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
03-26-2015, 07:09 PM | #805 | |||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And for the record I've always been against abortion. That's my personal view. But when I've been personally involved ultimately it wasn't my body, and I was told I couldn't tell her what to do with it. You know how women can be.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|||||
03-27-2015, 11:30 AM | #806 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
CHILLING PARALLELS BETWEEN CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS
CHILLING PARALLELS BETWEEN CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS
by Nick Gier, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, University of Idaho http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/ngier/parallels.htm
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
03-27-2015, 04:28 PM | #807 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: CHILLING PARALLELS BETWEEN CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS
Quote:
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-27-2015, 08:39 PM | #808 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: CHILLING PARALLELS BETWEEN CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS
Quote:
I'm not advocating abortion but I do have to point out that there's plenty of babies being born. Our species is thriving. Do we ever hear pro-lifer's shouting appreciation for that fact? Seems the one commandment of God we all -- believers, atheists, and all in between -- like to keep is, "be fruitful and multiply." Just google "baby farms" and see for yourself.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-28-2015, 05:59 AM | #809 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: CHILLING PARALLELS BETWEEN CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS
Quote:
Christians don't need to walk in a store and blow themselves up because we can sit back sipping a cup of coffee while still in the US and watch while we use our drones to slaughter people thousands of miles away. In some cases this is justified but we also kill innocents despite our best efforts to the contrary. I'm certainly not justifying terrorist attacks against the US or Israel but Muslims (mostly poor Muslims) blowing themselves up is simply one of the few weapons they can use in Western countries without access to drones or long range missiles. In any case, the article was not about the use of weapons it was about the similarities in belief between radical Muslim and Christian fundamentalism which has resulted in violence.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-28-2015, 08:16 AM | #810 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: CHILLING PARALLELS BETWEEN CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS
Quote:
Finally I understand the justification for suicide bombers. I used to think it was Islam's false promises in a pleasurable after life and payoffs for surviving family members. Now I have discovered that they have no other recourse in life but to blow themselves up in crowded market places. Had they drones, however, they would be out of a job. And shame on all those rotten fundamentalist American Christians sipping lattes at Starbucks while drones are launched at innocent, peaceful, and defenseless Mooslims. Oh the "chilling parallels!" I get chills running up and down my spine just thinking about them.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-28-2015, 10:05 AM | #811 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: CHILLING PARALLELS BETWEEN CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS
Quote:
This article notes, "The evidence from the database largely discredits the common wisdom that the personality of suicide bombers and their religion are the principal cause. It shows that though religion can play a vital role in recruiting and motivating potential future suicide bombers, the driving force is not religion but a cocktail of motivations including politics, humiliation, revenge, retaliation and altruism." BTW--we are not sitting at Starbucks drinking our lattes but we are drinking our lattes while sitting at a desk with a monitor and joy stick, guiding the drones and firing missiles at targets just like a video game. Of course, we are using our best intelligence but it is thousands of miles removed from the killing fields. The US has determined that the risk/reward is worth it so it will continue. I am not opposed to using drones in some situations but we do have some fallout from its use. Anyway, as I said in my last post suicide bombers and fundamentalist bombers are not an issue in the article I mentioned earlier.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-28-2015, 01:50 PM | #812 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: CHILLING PARALLELS BETWEEN CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS
Quote:
There are numerous reasons to motivate suicide bombers. But if the reasons you cited were real reasons then every religion would have them. Obviously that is not the case. That army psychiatrist who went on a rampage made it clear at the end what he was doing and why when he shouted "Allah is great," but guys like you would rather believe it was "workplace violence."
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-28-2015, 02:43 PM | #813 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: CHILLING PARALLELS BETWEEN CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS
Quote:
India and the Kashmir conflict---every heard of that? Between Pakistan and India...why do you think they both have nukes? Those are Hindus vs Muslims. The number of Muslims in the world is 1.6 billion, about one quarter of the world's population. What about the various religions in africa which have been fighting each other for eons.... there are just too many to enumerate? Here is a list if you are really interested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...icts_in_Africa Did you ever hear about the Ireland conflict -- Protestants against the Catholics----terrorists were involved and they weren't Muslim. Buddhists---you better believe there have been armed conflicts with Buddhists and they have been called terrorists...from other religions. For the sake of time I'll stop here but I really wonder where you get your history from anyway? Fox News? or the 900 Club? All you have to do is read the OT to know the terror and massacres that Israel brought to anyone who didn't agree with them in the name of the Lord. The Crusades, the Inquisition etc. and so on. Revelation is full of war. Religion has been the cause of wars ever since the beginning of the first bowed head. Who are the we? We are the people in this country and I can tell you that you don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that there are not very many Muslims manning those drones. And they aren't mostly atheists or agnostics either? There are 2.16 billion Christians in the world and 83% of the US population calls themselves Christians. And by the way, fundamentalist Christians often advocate military service...they generally are not pacifists. You already said you didn't favor gun control. In any case, my guess is a large number of Christians are manning those drones and a good percentage of fundamentalist Christians. However, I already said that drones service a purpose but because of some of the collateral damage they are creating problems for us and others among the Muslims in those countries. We have been fortunate that our country has evolved into a democracy. If you recall the Pilgrims sought religious freedom because of persecution and that is why they came to the US. I would like to keep it that way.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
03-29-2015, 08:10 AM | #814 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: CHILLING PARALLELS BETWEEN CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS
Quote:
When will it ever end? (Answer: when the primate becomes extinct, religiously speaking ... but critters will still kill critters to live - unless God sets up His Kingdom)) I think this is Ohio's concern, that, liberal leaders here in America will conclude that religion is causing all the problems in the world, will relate fundamentalist Christians to it, and will round them all up and put them all in FEMA camps ... that they've already got set up and ready (LBL here in Ky one of them -- which is funny, because, every fundamentalist in Ky can't fit into LBL - We'd have to have another Trail of Tears, but of fundamentalists Christians this time -- not of dirt lovers, the Injuns, those devil worshipers -- and drive them up to Ohio (pun intended).. But Bible believing Christians don't want to be painted with the "all religion is bad brush." That's why they are eating up David Barton (a revisionist), of Wallbuilders fame, that is making fundamentalists rounds, with, interviews (like on the 900 club), teachings, videos, books, and sermons, on how America is great because ... wait for it ... it was founded by Christians and on Christian principles. And that's why we (the fundamentalists 'we') have to blame bad religion on the MOOOOOsilms. What's funny is at one time Christians (the royal 'we' Christians of yore) rounded up the Injuns and put them on reservations, and now, we (same 'we') want to round up the MOOOOOsilms, and put them on reservations around the world ... which will prolly be on all the deserts. When will it ever end? Primates, it turns out, are the worst animals on the earth. God better'd love us. We have no other hope ... lit'al ol' methinks ... and, BTW God, where's that Kingdom? What's the hold up? Beam me up Lord. There's no sign of intelligence down here.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
03-30-2015, 09:54 AM | #815 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Here's a new book of some relevance to this thread for those who are interested:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-02-2015, 07:15 AM | #816 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
The Biblical inerrantist seeks objective certainty in the Bible that simply cannot be supported by evidence or logic. Such supposed knowledge is antithetical to faith. As Soren Kierkegaard said:
"If I am able to apprehend God objectively, I do not have faith; but because I cannot do this, I must have faith. If I want to keep myself in faith, I must continually see to it that I hold fast the objective uncertainty, see to it that in the objective uncertainty I am “out on 70,000 fathoms of water” and still have faith."
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-02-2015, 07:40 AM | #817 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-02-2015, 10:00 AM | #818 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/0...?detail=email#
"As Disciples, we are particularly sensitive to the values of the One we follow – one who sat at table with people from all walks of life, and loved them all." Good for them, I say.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-02-2015, 10:21 AM | #819 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I'm not as prone to fear over the direction of politics, culture, etc., as some, but this on quote was well pointed:
Quote:
We now have what would appear to be a standoff on the hierarchy of laws. Does the free exercise of my religion end if I actually have to engage in commerce? It is one thing to disagree with my moral/religious convictions, but another to try to outlaw me for them. But at some level we have brought it on ourselves. Rather than holding our moral convictions for ourselves, we (a generic we that does not necessarily include all of us, but is viewed by the outside as such) have been busy trying to hold our moral convictions on behalf of everyone else. And forcing them on those others. I do understand the position of someone speaking for the unborn and powerless. But the way it has been done often does not speak well of our claim to love our neighbor as ourselves. In fact, it seems more like we really don't give a hoot about our neighbor unless they are violating one of our favorite moral laws. Then we love only the "righteous" and not the sinner. It is entirely proper to advocate for those who cannot do so for themselves. But advocating does not equal preemptive strikes with deadly force, or the hurling of insults. I have a hard time finding that as a proper activity for a Christian who is actually trying to love their neighbor as they do themselves. I think we need to do two things. And do them at the same time. One is to point out the hypocrisy of insisting that we think like someone else does without even consideration that maybe they should think the way we do. An honest person would realize that this can only be solved when both sides can be truly tolerant of the other without agreeing. The other point is that we need to be truly tolerant of others and their views and morality no matter how they react to us. We can claim that they can't really believe homosexuality or abortions are moral. But we have no basis to say that. So failure to be tolerant on our part is likely one of the reasons that they are turning to be intollerant of us. It is not right. But not unexpected. So we see a fundamentalist right being attacked by a fundamentalist left, which was at least partly created in reaction to attacks by the fundamentalist right. Don't claim that I am just blamiing the Christians or the right. It is circular. And as long as we (either side) think that our way must be respected and followed, then fight to make it so, it will continue. It might continue anyway. And if those dire predictions come true, we might have some actual basis for complaint of religious persecution. And maybe in our humbled state we can rediscover what it is to be a Christian and once again have the kind of testimony that was prayed for by Christ.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-02-2015, 11:38 AM | #820 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Why don't these Christians follow the NT and just preach the gospel? Paul's letters when you consider the 1st chapter of Romans relates to Christians and their practices and not unbelievers.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
04-02-2015, 03:39 PM | #821 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I was struck by this statement: ". . . where gay militants shouted down the celebrant, and demanded Holy Communion — only to throw it down and stomp on the body of Christ." Statements like that are self defeating for the Catholics. It rings back to the church killing whole towns of Jews for, 'driving a nail thru the Eucharist and, killing Jesus all over again.' That sort of statement, from the Catholic apologist Zmirak, makes the church look to be irrational to the point of absurdity, and INVITES mockery. So the gays win because the church is defeating itself by making what is to the average rational person unbelievable claims. Besides, if Zmirak is concerned about homosexuality let him look to his own ranks. And busy himself with exposing ex-Pope Ratzinger for using Vatican sovereignty to protect crimes committed by pedophile priests. All this fuss over the Indiana Religious-Freedom Act. Why? The congressmen responsible, after all the twitter flames, and media reaction, said something like: "Discrimination? What discrimination?" Discrimination was easy when it was against the blacks. Their color gave them away. So this law forces gays back into the closet. That way they won't give themselves away. And this is suppression of the right to be who we are. Indiana's Religious Freedom act is a direct unabashed attack on gays. It should be called Religious Persecution act. Religious Freedom act is a sneaky insidious euphemism, actually hiding discrimination by the religious, and is not designed to protect religious freedom. The law was obviously written by some religious right-wing-nut jobs ... standing with a Biblical morality, that's against homosexuality. They're just using the law to force their morality on others.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
04-02-2015, 08:14 PM | #822 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-03-2015, 06:05 AM | #823 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But it is also the same kind of alarmism that I keep hearing in certain of my older relatives. And I would rather speak to what I believe to be at least reasonably right than just harping on the whackos. And both sides have whackos. They say that as you get older you either shift toward the extremes or you shift toward the middle. I am finding myself somewhere toward the middle. The article is plausible. But it would require a judiciary that is willing to take subsequent rule of law over constitution. So far, that has mostly not been the case. And the few that arguably have seem to be of limited scope. If that changes, then we have something to talk about. But the article demonstrates that the characteristics that we label "fundamentalism," meaning extremism with no ability to see beyond their position, fall on both sides of virtually every position. We scream how the gays want to outlaw us for insisting they be moral. But "we" were out there arguing that they be put in jail for being what they wanted to be. "We" didn't get what we wanted, and now, despite our claim to be the majority, are sure that they will get what they want. I see their rhetoric and it is as bad or worse than "ours" was. But that does not mean they will get what they want. That article reminded me of those links from Yahoo and Google to some "article" or video where someone goes on and on saying nothing in particular but promising to eventually get to the "truth" that everyone needs to hear. Or the stock everyone needs to buy. Or the . . . . In other words, it is a collection of the worst views on a particular subject put together for the purpose of inciting a riot of response. And they didn't get me. That does not mean I have no concerns. But I have a different view. I am a sojourner here. My country is not this one, though I enjoy its protection and freedoms. Better than virtually anywhere else on earth. Enjoy them while you can. The evil in the hearts of man would corrupt it. Whether it corrupts it in a way that is pleasing or unpleasing is not really important. But both before and after, it is not the kingdom of God. Never was and never will be. But we should be.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-03-2015, 06:21 AM | #824 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Digging up every possible error by anyone connected with Christianity in any way and vilifying the whole for it. Truth is, both religious and non-religious persons have done both good and evil things with and without invoking any kind of god. Isolate the ones where a god is in any way involved and it makes no particular case other than man tends toward evil and will use anything available to justify it. Using Catholic dogma concerning the Eucharist does not make them wrong enough to justify the actions of those who would force their immorality on anyone who does not agree with them. And while I think this religious freedom act is highly misguided, I think that we should be able to speak back to them that using the laws of the land to force anyone to act against what they understand to be their religious beliefs is not only un-American, it is unconstitutional. I am willing to accept that if you want to open for business, you have to serve anyone that is legally allowed to ask to be served. But to force a façade of acceptance is ridiculous. For those who protest the likely demise of Indiana's act, while I think that the forcing of its termination by law would be unconstitutional, if it is merely a bow to the pressures of the populace, then I have little to say, except maybe to begin the debate on the merits of the rule. Yet there is something a little unsettling about Christians arguing that they need a law that allows them to shun sinners. To refuse to eat with them or do business with them. Wow!! In other words, to be exact what Jesus was NOT!!
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-03-2015, 08:47 AM | #825 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Digging up every possible error by anyone connected with Christianity in any way and vilifying the whole for it.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
04-03-2015, 08:58 AM | #826 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Here a theologian analyzes how the problem that pervades Fundamentalism and the so-called Lord's Recovery produces revolt:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-03-2015, 10:43 AM | #827 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
And this is the reason that we find people either crazed into rabidly needing to find God in everything, or refusing to accept God in anything.
I am beginning to think there is an alternative that remains consistent with the book we say is God's Word. It is God's Word, but not in the "I ordered every word and every action in it" kind of way. It is man's record of interaction with the true God, therefore it reveals God. But it is also man's attempt to sprinkle God onto everything that happens. So so much of the decrees to wipe people out may not have been as often truly sourced to God. (I admit that there are a couple that seem to be exactly that.) And those final chapters of Judges — where the guy cuts his concubine into pieces after she is brutally raped by the men of a town all night long — that is not a record of what God did, but how far the Israelites had degraded. God is found throughout the Bible. But unlike most sacred books, it is not entirely some dictated tome of pontifications. Instead it is interspersed with the writers' recording of history — theirs — and at some points including actions of God, or at least attributing them to God whether or not deserved. But all of that is linked to a different view of God and sovereignty. While God is sovereign, I believe that he does not act in such a manner that nothing is outside his detailed sovereignty. Surely if my thought is true, then even the allowances of others to do what the will is at least a matter of sovereign restraint, therefore still a matter of sovereignty. But not in the sense of orchestrating everything. So whether I may this woman or that may not be something that has been preordained (other than someone standing outside of time would know the outcome, but that is not the same as dictating how it will be). That He comes and works in me through the time that I am married to person X is a given. But what happens that he gets to use is not necessarily dictated and ordained. Otherwise the whole premise of free will is a farce. If that is true, then preaching the gospel to others is pointless. They will or won't get saved. Of course I will have no choice about preaching the gospel, since it is preordained. But I have no need to worry about it because I have no control. And I believe that is balderdash. Instead, I believe that God wants people who choose Him and choose to live in the manner that He has directed. While he now provides tools and assistance, without our active participation, it does not occur. It doesn't even move toward occurring. We just become religious still-borns due to failure to thrive. Yeah we have joyous experiences — or at least things that make us feel all warm and fuzzy inside. But we fail to go out and live righteously, loving our neighbor as ourselves. Instead we want the freedom to shun gays in all circumstances. We want the government to allow us to do what God would not allow. A bunch of people will holler at me now. "He thinks we should even love the gays!" "He wants us to walk according to the Spirit before we have gotten enough dispensing!" And so we mock those who do not have some outward evidence that they are ready to jump and shout and therefore declare them to be dead and lifeless. I'm not sure that what we declare to be life is strings on a puppet. Dead wood being carried wherever the puppeteer wants us to go as we declare those who actually live their own lives to be dead. Despite the length, this is not a complete thought. I haven't answered the mystery of the ages. But I believe I am on to something. Funny thing is that I like evangelism's theology, but not their orthopraxy. Great words coupled with lousy practice in too many cases. Yet too often better practice is tied to questionable theology. So I probably still need to rethink something here.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
04-03-2015, 03:28 PM | #828 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
This is why I don't think you get what is going on and why the article is misrepresenting Gays and others who support their rights. It tries to show that the Gays are wacko when they are not...they are simply fighting for their rights to be served equally in a restaurant as we saw in Indiana this past week. I lived in the South long enough to see black and white bathrooms but those who fought for equality were considered extreme. Marching, protesting and voicing their opinion is not extreme although at the time it appears to be. Let's just say we each have a different take on the article although we may be closer than you think.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
04-04-2015, 09:37 AM | #829 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-04-2015, 12:13 PM | #830 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Franklin Graham weighs in with another appeal to fear:http://www.charismanews.com/us/48888...ir-end-is-near
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-04-2015, 12:37 PM | #831 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
04-04-2015, 12:40 PM | #832 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
This is where the idea of tolerance comes to play. We have been asked to be tolerant of the gay "lifestyle." I will be the first to say that "we" have not done very well at that. But assuming we can manage that, it is only reasonable that they likewise be tolerant of the fact that it is in contradiction of our religious moral codes and therefore will not simply be accepted as normal or right by us. Otherwise the whole idea of tolerance is a joke. Either there is something that I/we do not agree with that we tolerate, or we have to change our mind to think like they do. If the latter is the requirement, then why not have it go the other way? And the war resumes. My post was not in agreement with, or entirely a critique of the article. I read it. I understood it. It was about the Christian right falling all over themselves worried that they might lose some of the God-given American rights. Like the right to be bigots with impunity. What no one has analyzed is what Jesus thought about the sins of those he ate with. He ate with them. And he spent time with them. And that really irked the "religious right" of their day. But he did not simply say that continuing in their sin was OK. Whenever he spoke to the ones who came to him, he dealt with their needs and sent them on their way to "sin no more." The problem with modern fundamentalism is that we have it all backward. We want them to sin no more. Then and only then will we talk to them about anything else. And it is creating a social problem for those who are not interested in listening to the moral demands of the Christians. (And the problem really ours, not theirs.) The article is from the position of fear mongers who want the Christians to fight even harder to demand their religious rights. And there is some constitutional basis for that. But it is not necessarily a Christian response, only a legal one. Legal is not bad. But it is not necessarily loving of your neighbor. The problem is that there are some who have been exactly as dogmatic that everyone has to accept them (as the article claims) and like it or else. But that is not a majority position. But that is what the fear mongers will latch onto. So I get the article. I do not agree with it as presented, but I get it. But not agreeing with that is not the same as agreeing with the positions that are simply opposite of the article (or alternately in agreement with the positions the article claims are the positions of the "other" side). Rather than railing against the left, or railing against the right, I see a different place that is somewhere in between. It does not require that Christians simply accept homosexuality in all of its forms as part of the community of faith, but does require that Christians be tolerant and learn how to love those who do not agree on our moral positions. It does not require that homosexuals be vilified at will by Christians, but does require that they accept that we live by a moral code that is not entirely dictated by the positions of society. We live by it. They do not. We have a requirement with respect to ourselves, not with respect to them. And until we get that, we are as much the problem as anybody. And spending a lot of time ranting about what's wrong with the people who write the alarmist stuff like that article isn't doing anything either. We have to fix ourselves. We need a solution, not just identification of the surface problem. We need to understand where the problem really lies. It is not in whether our morality is consistent with the Bible (although some would argue for that one), but that our approach to the whole issue is misdirected. So if you just want someone to point at and say "they're wrong" then we should really dump on the mentality that wrote that article. I think that showing where we should be is more important than just pointing out that they are wrong (although they ultimately need to understand that).
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-04-2015, 10:48 PM | #833 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-05-2015, 06:48 AM | #834 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
A real twist on this article is the Metropolitan Community Church (MCC) http://mccchurch.org/ which my wife and I attended once a couple years ago (one of their affiliated churches). It was lively, warm, mostly white and very Christian and Christ and Bible focused. However, it is also very open to the LGBT lifestyle and probably most of the members are of that persuasion. The minister who is gay is one of the interfaith leaders in the community. If any of them were on this forum they would be shouting Hallelujah and defending the faith, etc.... They are having a large celebration of the Resurrection of Christ this weekend. I would think they have to be an embarrassment to the White Fundamentalist Evangelicals who rail against the gay lifestyle. In any case, I thought your response was reasonable.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
04-05-2015, 10:00 AM | #835 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Graham has simply dusted off a message that the end is near for the U.S. because of the sins of America that has been preached for eons. It's really nothing new but I guess he believes he is the prophet of the age (POTA). Sound familiar?
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
04-05-2015, 12:02 PM | #836 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Here's a Progressive Christian take on Easter:
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/...stians/6367512
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-05-2015, 09:33 PM | #837 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Here's some Christian groups that make Lee's Local Church look very good indeed: http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-pol...ver-hear-about
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-06-2015, 08:50 AM | #838 |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
It just goes to show you that any group of nutjobs can call themselves "Christians". Of course the real danger to people of the 21st century are the various radical Islamic groups, and I'm sure the vast majority of conservative Muslims are looking upon these violent cowards with the same horror that the vast majority of conservative, evangelical Christians are looking upon the groups cited in this article.
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
04-06-2015, 10:26 AM | #839 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
04-06-2015, 10:49 AM | #840 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But the Lord sees it differently. The Lord loves everyone that comes to Him in any way. He's not near as narrow, or dogmatic, as you are bro UntoHim. From the very beginning of Christianity there's been all kinds of Christians. But the move became corrupted from it's wondrous multifariousness by Emperor Constantine who made it just one thing. And seems that the Protestants, even, carry that tradition on ; howbeit maybe a different version. Quote:
There's all kinds of Christians, bro UntoHim, not just your kind.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
||
04-06-2015, 05:19 PM | #841 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-06-2015, 05:25 PM | #842 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
and you may be referring to this one: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/...stians/6367512
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-06-2015, 05:45 PM | #843 | ||||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
"The Lord"? What L(l)ord, Harold? It can't possibly be the Lord Jesus Christ because you don't believe that he was raised from the dead, so he's still dead and can't possibly be telling you anything, right?
Quote:
But this sacrifice came at a price, a very high price. And this high price was paid in order that sinful man can indeed "come to the Father" ....but there is something on our part as well - it is faith, but not just any faith, it is the faith that saves us. Your "comes to Him in any way" is very generous Harold, and touching as well....but the problem is that you are not God, and you did not send your very own precious, sinless Son to die on a Roman cross, so God's accepting of anyone coming to him is based upon a standard of faith that God himself has set "I told you that you would die in your sins; if you do not believe that I am he, you will indeed die in your sins" (John 8:24) The "I am he" part is what the Gospels are all about. Actually you can thank God that I'm not as narrow or dogmatic as God...he probably wouldn't have created this "dungeon" as you guys dub it. But then again, the stakes aren't nearly as high here.... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
||||
04-06-2015, 06:44 PM | #844 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
You judge God harshly, and place yourself above Him! Whatever are you thinking, Brother UntoHim?
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-06-2015, 09:20 PM | #845 |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Wow, zeek, that whole masterpiece of a post and that's all ya got?
What say you Harold? Cat got your tongue?
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
04-07-2015, 05:39 AM | #846 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Kinda looks like 4 questions but really they are tied together. I ask this because I (I think like you) have spent virtually all of my life in religious environments (including the LCM) in which after the fact you say that things were working on you (the HS was working on you) and one day someone presented the gospel, whether the first time you heard it or the umpteenth, and suddenly there is a "that's it" inside, you pray a certain kind of prayer, and you cross a line in the sand and are forever saved. No matter what. And you had nothing to do with it at all. You didn't even have the will power to decide to believe, but it was given to you. And according to some, you never have anything that is not given to you. Let's start with the last part. I am clear that the thing that saves me is strictly Christ's sacrifice applied to me. But despite the typical Calvinist notion that I can't even believe in it on my own so that it will be applied, I think this might be a construct that is not supportable. As I see it, I can believe, but I still cannot save myself. No matter how hard or strongly I believe, it is only the application of the sacrifice of Jesus to my sin that saves me. I have no part in that. It is fully by grace. So the "saved by grace" mantra still stands. My belief does not save me (although in at least one place I thing Jesus said something like "your faith has made you whole"). It is still what Jesus did that does the work. But we have to believe in it. So we are not without a part in the process, but we still do not "work" to "save ourselves." The other main part in my question has to do with what it means to believe. Is "think it for a short time" sufficient? Like for a moment as the personal crisis looms big and the idea of something bigger than your crisis is appealing, but fades quickly and virtually disappears once the crisis fades? Are we too focused on some act or line-in-the-sand rather than on a life of belief? Do we urge people to hear Billy Graham or other evangelist so that they cross the line or sign on the dotted line (regardless of whether they are ready to rescind the contract before the 3 business days opt-out ends? (Not saying anything about Billy Graham, but rather what we think we get from it.) Should something like "coming forward" at a Billy Graham crusade, or in response to a Southern Baptist altar call be the point at which we are saved? Or are we becoming fooled into failing to realize that it is only the first step in the process of being saved? That maybe there is a reason that the word "saved" is also used for what we call sanctification. And that is that we are not necessarily "saved" until we arrive at our end having belief in Christ. Not just having believed at a point in time. Even the famous John 3:16 does not say "whoever believed in me" but "believes in me." Right now, eternal life is tied to belief. If we can only say that we believed, can we assert that we believe? I know this sounds somewhat Arminian, but maybe in this one aspect they are not entirely wrong. But I can assure you that the people who sit in the best Calvinist churches are convinced that they have nothing to do. That their one time faith is it. And that grace is everything. They don't really care about anything else unless they think they have gotten the call to be a preacher or a missionary. They don't have to do good works or really act like righteous (or at least becoming righteous) Christians. They don't have to love their neighbor. In fact, if their neighbor is homosexual, they can open shun them. And they can openly shun even those poor Christians (if they really are Christians) in so many other groups. No. You can point to exceptions. And I know of some. But there is something disconcerting in this evangelical line-in-the-sand salvation that is bothering me. And it is not that I think the event is necessarily false. But rather what we think it means is wrong. It is not the point of salvation, but only the beginning. Therefore it cannot be pointed to as the sole reason for salvation. Just the beginning of salvation. And it is therefore unnecessary to have such an event as long as you come to believe, and continue to believe. And then there is the question of what is belief? Agreement with evidence and facts? Or living as if it is true? I honestly believe that those who understand salvation in a way that is not this popular line-in-the-sand version tend not to be among the fundamentalists that we are talking about. They see their faith and the way that leads them to life differently from those who have achieved salvation because of a point in time. The others believe that the point in time gives them grace to ignore their neighbor and just take grace for it. And that is true. But it is not right. Just a provision. But "we" live as if that is the way Christ intended. And I believe that it is not.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-07-2015, 05:57 AM | #847 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Your statement "I'm not as narrow or dogmatic as God..." reminds me of the servant in Jesus' parable who says to his master, "I was afraid of you, because you are a hard man. You take out what you did not put in and reap what you did not sow.’ He judges God harshly, lives his life niggardly and is rewarded accordingly. Who wants to be that guy? As it is you state that God loves everyone in one breath and that He is narrow and more dogmatic than you in another. That's what is known as a contradiction. It is illogical on the face. I thought you might wish to enlarge on the statement to show that it is reasonable somehow.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-07-2015, 08:35 AM | #848 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
If that's not enough ignorance, that I missed that link, I can't even spell "re-word." Thanks...
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
04-07-2015, 08:45 AM | #849 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
At the time of posting that I was on the phone with my old friend that's a Pentecostal Preacher now. He was telling me that my Christian friend, that's been seeking to follow the Spirit for over 3 decades, is not following the Holy Spirit (or it would always result in wonderful blessings, which it hasn't for her) and that she's deceived and following the devil and is, probably not even saved.
He said he knows she's not saved because she doesn't attend a full gospel church. There's all kinds of Christians, and even all kinds of fundamentalists. Even JWs are fundamentalists. They too hold to the five fundamentals.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
04-07-2015, 09:37 AM | #850 | ||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
||
04-07-2015, 12:08 PM | #851 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||
04-07-2015, 01:48 PM | #852 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But I think that our propensity is to pull it out to support positions that we take that might seem beyond what would be popular to accept. But in that case, we have figured out his ways and thoughts and are declaring them as ours (and suggesting that "you" are deficient for not agreeing). A little like declaring a particular position to be "biblical" or saying this is what the Bible says and the Bible is inerrant. We are not necessarily sure that it really is the final word on what God or the Bible says about anything, but declaring it biblical or inerrant makes it the gold standard without reconsideration. "God's ways are not our ways" is not the answer to the apparent contradiction pointed out between the statements "God loves everyone" and "He is narrow and more dogmatic." While it is true that His ways are not ours, it is not the reason that the two can or cannot coexist. It is no more contradictory than saying "I love Tex-Mex" and "I am trying to lose weight" (both true statements for me). What is wrong with my statements or those of zeek is not that they are irreconcilable, but neither can be taken as absolute and all-encompassing since to do so would be to negate the other. But they coexist as long as each has its function and role. God's love taken to absolutes would negate righteousness and justice. But love must have bounds if there is to be righteousness or justice. Same for righteousness and justice. Same goes for my favorite food and my desire to be a little less rotund. The interesting thing about the verse provided is that it has a context. In its context, the statement does not appear to be saying that God's mind is out of our reach. Instead, it is saying that we should forsake our thoughts and take on His. We are fallen and naturally go the wrong way. Forsake our ways and take on His. The only way we can do this is to actually see them and take them as ours. That verse is not saying "you don't get it and can't get it." It is saying that we naturally go the wrong way and think the wrong things, so turn to a different way and thought because to follow God you have to change your mind and your will. It doesn't explain why the God that is love also doles out justice. It invites us into a new way of living. I think that the way this verse was brought out is demonstrative of the problem with so much theology. Everything is overanalyzed at the micro stage and less at the macro stage with the result that "change your ways" becomes "you just can't figure it out." More thought is given to what we can and can't get our minds around and less and less about what we should be doing with it (which is living it).
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-07-2015, 02:44 PM | #853 | |||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
OBW,
I wasn't answering to an apparent contradiction because there isn't one. God's love and his requirement for believe and faith in the Person and work of Jesus Christ are not antithetical or contradictory in the slightest, and I think John 3:16, one of the most quoted NT verses, illustrates this rather nicely. I try to just use the plain words of the Bible whenever possible because, well, it's always better to use God's words rather than are own, and if I try to use my words I just screw it up every time. Apparently it's happened again on this very thread. I quoted Isaiah 55:9 as an answer to zeek's statement Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|||
04-07-2015, 02:57 PM | #854 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I may not always be right, but I'm determined to at least think about it. And see if it strikes anyone else differently.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-07-2015, 03:20 PM | #855 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Yeah, he often seems to go on and on about stuff that we can't figure out how it is worth answering. But too often, somewhere near the beginning is a legitimate question or comment that we lose in the sea of what follows. Maybe rather than latching onto the stuff that follows, we could listen to the beginning because I find there to be something worthy of at least grappling with rather than tossing aside without consideration. Maybe we legitimately dismiss the rest, but at least look for something worthy of comment rather than mere dismissal or chastisement for failure to just buck-up and get with the program. (This is not just you. It has been me and others at times.) And despite all of the very theologically sound things that underpinned the beginnings of the Christian fundamentalism of the past century, there is now too much of it that does not fit. And even though those true fundamentals are still in there, they are not what most of the bantering of the group is about. And even when it is, there is an ingredient missing that should be among the core of the fundamentals. And that is love. "We" are more interested in being "fundamentally" correct concerning things that are not the fundamentals, and failing to love those who disagree. Or who even just disagree on how to agree. After the garbage version of the LCM that Harold endured (much worse than I ever saw), I'm not sure that I could see past the nonsense of the rest to see the true core of faith, orthodoxy, and orthopraxy. And when it comes to orthodoxy, I think that there is much less to be orthodox about than there is to put into practice, but the arguments are almost all about thinking and not about doing. Maybe his way is not helpful to the discussion. But just maybe it is sometimes there to make us reassess what is important and what is the stuff that we should not worry about.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-07-2015, 03:42 PM | #856 | ||||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
It could just as easily be a trickster spirit, for all we know. But it's all we got. Maybe the only way we can be certain is to say "In the name of Jesus" while "hearing" THE LORD. And in that sense we're using the Cargo Cult method of obtaining God's cargo we call "hearing." Everything has got to be just right, or the result might turn out to be the opposite of God's clear speaking. And to be real certain, that we're in touch with THE REAL LORD, I guess, whatever "speaking" we "hear" had bettered quote the Bible word for word. Then, and only then, could we be certain that the lord we are "hearing" is THE LORD. That means that we're just being idiots for even bothering God with "speakings" and "hearings," cuz He already said it in the Bible. Why do we need to make HIM repeat it? We're just being a pest. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
||||||
04-08-2015, 06:46 AM | #857 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
So how can you know and be so certain about a God whose ways and thoughts are beyond you/us? You claim verses to know these ways and thoughts that are clearly way beyond us. But God's ways and thoughts are still way beyond us. If your gonna be dogmatic at least be dogmatic about not knowing God's ways and thoughts. Of course that doesn't lend itself to ministries. Ministers, like Lee, have to sound like they know God's ways and thoughts ... or they'll be out of business.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
||
04-08-2015, 07:34 AM | #858 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And yes UntoHim, we've been going around and around for years now. Boy how time flies ... when yer having fun. It's hard to believe! Years!?! At a little restaurant in town, on Easter morning, I was talking with a couple of believers. We carried the whole restaurant, sitting around at our different tables. At one point Rob, a long standing Church of Christ faithful said, "You always have something opposite to say, and I'm always wrong." I responded with, "You're wrong about that." The whole restaurant busted out laughing. He fell back in his seat and rolled his eyes, with a look of exasperation on his face. I love Rob. And he loves to hate me. That's our bond. That's UntoHim and me ... methinks ... perchance ... possibly ... after some similarity. I love UntoHim. God loves UntoHim. God overlooks our silly religious ways. Thank God ... or we'd all be lost.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
04-08-2015, 08:13 PM | #859 | ||||||
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
How do we know it's THE LORD? Because the THE LORD inspired about 40 men over a period of about 2,000 years to record his Word - So now we can compare those little voices in our head with the inspired Word. So when we feel like stealing something that doesn't belong to us, and we think a little voice in our head says "it's alright", we can be sure that the little voice is wrong because God has already told us in his Word "Thou shalt not steal". Of course now in this age we also have the Holy Spirit, but we can be assured that the Holy Spirit would never lead us to disobey the Word of God. So no need for all $5 words, my friend. "How firm a foundation ye saints of the Lord, has been laid for our faith in his excellent Word!". Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
||||||
04-09-2015, 07:05 AM | #860 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-09-2015, 09:15 AM | #861 | |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
The fact that the Bible doesn't give us detailed scientific information regarding the Big Bang, the exact age of the earth, the danger of asteroids and comets, the mystery of the cambrian explosion, the coming and going of dinosaurs, how DNA, the most involved "program" in the universe just came out of nothing and programs itself, why the duck-billed platypus lays eggs and whether or not Old Faithful has always been faithful...mean NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, in the grand scheme of God's salvation for you and me. And the parts of the Bible that give us the wonderful story of this salvation are the focus of my attention, and I'll haggle over all the other stuff when I have time and feel like it.
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
|
04-09-2015, 09:35 AM | #862 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-09-2015, 11:42 AM | #863 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
So "my ways" were not something unattainable, but very attainable. Surely the absolutely perfect ethical norm is beyond us because even when we observe the workings of God, we cannot devise the blend of love, righteousness, mercy, grace, justice, etc., that becomes that norm.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-09-2015, 10:49 PM | #864 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-10-2015, 05:30 AM | #865 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Lee's formula was to not bother until there was some magical ability to succeed right out of the box. Unless the issue was something that they wanted to make some point about and then you had to be spot on able to do exactly what they wanted or you might as well just leave. His version of taking grace was for the obvious sin that was going to be occurring as you don't actually stop your sin until it just falls on you to stop your sin. Anything else is "works" and is said to be contrary to God's grace or something like that. We weren't supposed to try to not sin — just take grace for sinning. And you don't actually have to repent for the sin. Just take the grace for it. It almost seems that they are flaunting the sin so that grace may abound. Exactly what Paul warned against. At some level the Evangelical side of Christianity does a somewhat less extreme version of the same thing. Oddly, the more old-school churches that incorporate a liturgy of regular repentance seem to get this part more right. We may not like how much they have made belief in certain things like miracles optional, but they seem to understand their state of being better than the rest of us. The problem for many of us is that God doesn't always point to every one of our shortcomings at the same time. He gives us time to grow on some then adds some more. But when we seem to just ignore a lot of it, he doesn't always just wait on the rest. Instead we see our shortcomings begin to pile up. Or alternately we are good at figuring out our shortcomings, but unwilling to take on some of it if we can't take on all of it. And all of it just might be overwhelming. At my age, I would think I had grown more than I have. But I am where I am. What I need is to face my shortcomings, my sin, and repent. Not just "take grace" for it and move on. And make some kind of effort to actually walk according to the Spirit. That requires me to set my mind each day. Some days I do it better than others. It doesn't just fall on me. If it did, I should be in much better shape now. It took centuries for the people of Israel to completely get rid of their idols. It was the one of the core problems of their continued fall from God's blessing on them. We don't have to deal with it as a nation, but as people who only have one lifetime. The key seems to be movement, not perfection. Waiting is not moving. And faking is not moving. We will not be perfect, so if that is what we think the goal is, we will become paralyzed. But neither is the goal to be babes in Christ just drinking the milk of grace as we don't even try to overcome our failures. I need to face my failure and sin each day. "Have mercy on me, Oh God, according to your steadfast love. . . ." But not just stop there. Take grace as the means, the ingredient, to begin to live in a manner that ends the need for that prayer with respect to yesterday's failure. There will forever be more to repent about. Just deal with today. Our ways are not His ways and our thoughts are not His thoughts. But he calls us to recognize the difference and exchange ours for His.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-10-2015, 08:42 AM | #866 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
When you call Ehrman's work drivel isn't that branding him with spewing venom? Yet Ehrman after being born again didn't go to Moody, Wheaton, and Princeton, to learn drivel. He went to be more devoted to Jesus & the Bible. But questioning led him to become an agnostic (that big question that even you can't answer : the problem of evil and suffering, and how God, who has the power to stop it, doesn't.). Maybe I should give you the benefit of the doubt. So I'll ask outright. Just one example will do. Are the scholars and fellows of the Jesus Seminar spewing venom? Their actual purpose it to ask questions about the historical Jesus. If you're not familiar pick up a copy of The Five Gospels by Robert Funk. It's a great book, containing your favorite books (plus Thomas (is it venom?)), with lots of questions about about them. You are right. You've never said questioning is spewing venom (thank God). So tell me, are the questions of the Jesus Seminar venom or not? Are the questions Professor Ehrman raises about all the differences in the Greek NT manuscripts venom? Yes there's lots of atheists on the web. But not all of them spew venom. Richard Dawkins seems very intelligent. Still, you have stated that as long as you are at the on/off switch you will not allow "such venom" on this forum. So please clarify what you consider venom. And don't answer with something like, "atheism and humanism, et al," your standard go-to. Spell it out so we will know. Cuz we're all tire of suddenly discovering one of your new rules, after unwittingly violating them. List them. Like, "anything that questions that the Bible is the Word of God is venom," or "questioning the virgin birth is venom," or "questioning the resurrection is venom." Do it for the forum. State YOUR "five fundamentals."
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
04-10-2015, 10:29 AM | #867 | ||||||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||||||||
04-10-2015, 12:12 PM | #868 | |||||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And then we probably all find ourselves there on occasion. - - - - I responded to more of the separate thoughts than I originally intended. I know that my posts are often long, but even when I seem to ramble, I am generally trying to discuss around a single topic. Sometimes facing one small part is good for discovering where logic breaks down. But otherwise, it seems that it is easy to effectively understand a lot of pieces and miss the whole. Somewhere between remaining babes in Christ, and having an ever-increasing list of fundamentals/rules to live by so that we display some kind of fanatical perfection is what I see the Bible painting a picture toward. Fragmenting that view into a bunch of one-liners seems to break the picture into pixels to be examined independently and thereby change the focus to something else. Not that where you went in each question or comment is not valid in itself. But I felt at times like some of the comments, and mine in return, were about something else. Like somewhat equating God's patience with our growth with the fact that he does not always just step in and stop heinous immorality. They are similar in a sense, but in another, they are not. Mostly because it makes our growth somehow tied to the German gas chambers and that is simply not the case. It is a kind of inflammatory and contrived connection. That is my opinion on it. If I were God, I might do things differently. But even there I would need to weigh the options of refusing the people I had created the right to be horribly sinful with the ultimate result that no one actually qualifies to live, therefore just destroy it all and either start over or forget it. No. I am willing to let God's decision on leaving the system of the world in place, including the natural calamities that can even kill me, so that there remains the option for me (any everyone else) to choose to believe in Christ and follow. Given the forces that would simply destroy us, that we have a chance for a different life is actually amazing. And if we are all wrong and it is simply be born, live, and die, getting upset with the therefore non-existent God doesn't change anything. So I choose to awaken each day and step out to do what I understand to be walking by the Spirit. Or at least trying to do that. It makes the life I am living better. Even if I am fooling myself into it. And I will enjoy that life more than anyone who is determined to be mad at someone else about why it isn't going well.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|||||
04-11-2015, 04:06 PM | #869 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Seems God has led me to the land of uncertainty so that all I have to fall back on is faith. And I have faith in infinite possibilities. Did a virgin birth happen two thousand years ago? It's within possibilities. Same with the death and resurrection ... and that the Bible is the Word of God. It surely is within possibilities. Those can't be "known" but by faith. Faith is a knowledge within the heart, beyond the reach of proof. - Khalil Gibran
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
||
04-12-2015, 08:30 PM | #870 | ||||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||||||
04-13-2015, 06:03 AM | #871 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Nazi Genocide was not an instance of God's judgment. It was part of the ongoing march of time toward judgment. That the judgment did not come immediately upon such heinous behavior is part of the reason that we all have the opportunity to repent of our sins rather than just be swallowed-up upon the first commission of sin — typically long before the ability to propagate the species, therefore ending the existence of mankind long before our generation. And there remains judgment for us all. The penalty for sin was dictated as death. God provided a way for that judgment to be set aside through a combination of repentance for sin committed and the death of an animal. That was followed by the replacement of the animal by the death of the Son of God — a death that would be available for all sin, but only for those who believe that it is effective for that sin. Judgment is still to come. Those who orchestrated and carried out the Nazi genocide will be judged. As will we for our sin. We would like to declare that the result of the judgment is based on our perception of the severity of our sin. But we are not the writer of the laws. Neither are we the judge or jury. We can dislike the laws all we want. I don't necessarily disagree that I would make laws differently. And administer them closer to the time of infraction. And this is where the verses concerning His ways and our ways come into play. It is so dissatisfying to be disgruntled with the way things are and will be. Much better to go along with the laws than to fight them. If there really is a God, there isn't much use to fight Him.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-13-2015, 08:40 AM | #872 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-13-2015, 12:38 PM | #873 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I cannot agree that my version of all of this is so markedly legalistic when I generally reject so much of the legalism that is the topic of this thread and instead embrace a Christianity that is comfortable with a broad spectrum of faith and practice/tradition and thinks that the average Christian in the pew is a plenty good Christian who does not need to display a nearly charismatic kind of joy to be considered more than a mooing cow (not something you have said). I find the only thing that is legalistic is to be loving and to be righteous. And these are not simple. And it is somewhat outside of our nature to be like that, especially all the time. So we do need to be striving toward it rather than shrinking back. And I can't get discouraged because Lee called it religion (and disparagingly) or that you seem to be somewhat doing the same now. For starters, I cannot find anything in what I have said that presupposes a 1:1 correspondence between the laws of man and the laws of God. That is what the "America is a Christian Nation" people are trying to do. But they will fail because it is not so. And the laws they seem to want do not reflect what I believe that God provides for us as the laws we are to live by. Mostly because the core of his laws for us is rooted in love. That puts a significant requirement on me, but not you (as far as I am concerned). That does not mean that among Christians there are not some aspects of God's righteousness that must be dealt with, such as a kind of church discipline. But it does not equate to forcing the morality of Christianity upon those who do not embrace our God. But that is not even the issue. The way you state your objection (if that is what it really is) seems to insist that I must know God's laws and absolutely adhere to them from now on or be cursed. I do not see that command. At least not in that way. Surely there is the command to do as taught. But it is not a stick to flog us, but a goal to attain. And part of the reason that it is a goal is that we cannot even see it all. We see darkly. Surely the light can increase. But we do not arrive at perfection. We do not arrive at the place where our conduct or even intent is 100%. In any case, I am not going to be dissuaded just because I can't figure it all out. God's ways aren't my ways. I will always think some aspect of mine are better or I would agree to give them up. But somehow I know that His are better. I just have some way to go to fully give up mine for His. A little like the drunk who realizes he just has to stop drinking as he orders the next double.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-13-2015, 04:45 PM | #874 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
zeek,
In my continued replies, I do seek to convince you of my way or thoughts. But I want to be understood the way I am trying to speak whether you are on board with it or not. That is sufficient. But if you want to go back and forth trying to see how our ideas bump up against each other, differ, or even agree, that is OK too. We may help each other in ways neither is expecting.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
04-13-2015, 06:23 PM | #875 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-14-2015, 04:48 AM | #876 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
We have been blessed with the ability to understand history and nature which are real. Whether you believe that God created all of the creatures or that they evolved we know for a fact that they exist. If you live in Florida it is inevitable that you will stumble upon a cockroach and whether God created the cockroach or it evolved is irrelevant. It exists and most everyone in Florida is making efforts to extinguish its existence from their habitat. When I stood on the precipice of the Grand Canyon or hiked down into its bowels I could appreciate an incredible creation and whether it was God who created it or the laws of nature and time which created this magnificent beauty is irrelevant. It gives rise to wonder and self-reflection. I am amazed at the history we have been able to compile whether it is from archaeological digs or from recorded history it is an incredible reflection on who we are today and how we arrived at this point in history. Whether you believe the Bible is the true recorded history is a matter of faith in a book with a finite history. Relying on historians and archaeologists is important because history continues to be recorded. We are a sphere hurling through space and time which is a reality whether you believe that God created this earth and the heavens or that the naturals laws of the universe worked to create it. It is a fact which gives us a perspective not understood in history by those who lived during the days when the early church was developing. The only judgment which we can take to the bank is that we will all face death and that is an inevitability which cannot be denied even though medical science is able to prolong that judgment day. Whatever judgment there is beyond death is simply a matter of faith. I would add that the judgment day as described by many Christians is interpretive based on one's Christian perspective of various verses in the Bible. There seems to be as many interpretations of the judgment day as there are Christian denominations. Even Paul in Romans 2 talks about judging others in a contemporary setting. When you look at Rev. 17 it is rather obvious that it was referring to a judgment of Rome in that day and not some future 2000 years later. Rome is built on 7 hills as well as the 10 rulers at the time in the empire referenced but that does not deter those who want to hurl Revelation into our present day context. In this Biblical context we lose all sense of history and as long as it is understood that it is a matter of faith to actually believe it is relevant to today makes it only barely bearable.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
04-14-2015, 06:04 AM | #877 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Somehow it does manage to account for changes in people's lives despite the popular mantra that people do not change. Or it is at least given credit much of the time. But when you mention that the Grand Canyon is such a sight to behold whether it was directly created, or formed over millions of years, I would agree. And also conclude that God can be behind either scenario. Somehow, the idea that it all started with a bang and nothing plus nothing suddenly produced something still requires faith in something that cannot be observed or studied. They may have reduced the role of something god-like to a smaller part of the equation, but they cannot avoid that part. It is not explained. Just believed. A form of faith. Faith in something they cannot explain and that is outside of the thing we call existence. So whatever you call it, there is a god. Something that cannot be seen, studied, or known in full. It must be believed without evidence. Faith.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
04-14-2015, 07:42 AM | #878 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||
04-14-2015, 07:50 AM | #879 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Thanks to President Obama, the end is very near according to Former Rep. Michele Bachmann: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/conten...e-thanks-obama
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-14-2015, 08:50 AM | #880 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Thanks for turning me on to Lutheran Satire, UntoHim. Witty thought-provoking stuff. Here's one entitled " "Messing With Dispensationalists" that is relevant to this thread :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5MDqUAfPcI
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-14-2015, 10:44 AM | #881 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I like this series from Lutheran Satire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=Uh5nyR4y-eI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFX8...yer_detailpage https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=0Nx8QqiADyw
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
04-14-2015, 03:09 PM | #882 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But she is lots of laughs.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
04-14-2015, 07:26 PM | #883 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
04-16-2015, 06:04 PM | #884 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
This kind of thinking was not welcome in the Local churches and they were worse for it: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/12/op...pgtype=article
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-22-2015, 02:02 PM | #885 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I wrote this in 2001 as a summary of my experience in the LC but it rings true with our experience in the LC as I perceived it as I left in 1978:
"In the early 1970s Witness Lee gave a several day training in Anaheim on the kingdom of heaven, which I attended. He indicated that despite the fact that we were saved Christians we still might not make the kingdom of heaven and we may well have to go through a kind of purgatory, for a period of time. Lee stated, '…To participate in the local church requires only salvation through faith; but to participate in the kingdom of the heavens requires further seeking to overcome, submitting to heavenly authority and receiving heavenly control and training after experiencing salvation.' Where was the heavenly authority and control? … in the center of the movement, from Witness Lee. While this may not have been the point of contention for others, it was for me. Although I still was involved and attended other trainings in Anaheim, I began to question the idea that we had to submit to Witness Lee’s authority or miss the kingdom of heaven, and eventually I decided that this was not what I wanted." It's interesting having never heard of LCD, Bereans etc that I came to the same conclusion most everyone else has arrived at. The issue I am grappling with on this forum is how Christians who have left the LC can now become a part of the Christianity they disagreed with while in the LC. Didn't we become part of the LC BECAUSE we already disagreed with what was going on with Christian denominations and what was advertised as the Christian life? As far as I was concerned I gave it my all in the LC for 9 years which was the last resort to see if this all was real despite its problems. Before we became involved in the LC, reading WN offered more than we were experiencing in our denominations and the LC during different periods of time was exciting. In the end, it is just like other denominations reflective of the problems they experienced in the NT churches only today we just have different divisive issues. Some of the attitudes on this forum seem to be "Christians" who come across as high and mighty. I thought we left that when we left the LC. No one is high and mighty anymore. Just goes to show you that you can take the person out of the LC but you can't take the LC out of the person.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
04-22-2015, 05:10 PM | #886 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Thank you for sharing your point of view Dave. As is probably clear to anyone who is paying attention to this thread by now, I am not a member of a religious organization of any kind. If committing my life to Christ at age 19 resulted in my membership and fellowship in a series of Christian churches from 1969 until 1996, my experience in the Local Church was a significant factor in my decision to discontinue participating in organized religion. But, the spiritual and ethical lessons I learned as a church member in various congregations have left an enduring imprint on my soul. The imprint is both positive and negative.
Eminent philosopher-psychologist William James in his seminal book The Varieties of Religious Experience spoke of two kinds of religion: the healthy and the sick. Sadly I find that much of the Lee experience and the influence of fundamentalism I find to be the sick kind. I friend of mine likes to say "You get what you accept." I refuse to accept that kind of negativity any more. I'm reading how contemporary neuro-science theory shows that the brain most likely evolved a built-in negativity bias. The theory suggests that while this bias emerged in harsh settings very different from our own, it continues to operate inside us today. Our brains have a hair-trigger readiness to go negative to help us survive. As a result negative stimuli are perceived more rapidly and easily than positive stimuli. Religions that preach fear appeal to the negative bias built into our neural structure. Thus, the powerful hold that fundamentalism has on us. To be transformed by the renewing of our our minds requires attending to positive mental states, staying with them in our consciousness so that they become sources of strength laid down in the neural structure of the brain.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-22-2015, 06:39 PM | #887 | |||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Of course, the rumors (some true but they were more related to issues of personal problems than anything specifically "Christian" related), the horror of those who left the LC and then the Christian faith and fell into alcoholic and drug related stupors (probably true for some)--rampant among them as the tale goes. That is the problem when a religion such as the LC or other religions is a prop for people---don't get me wrong this is a positive for a lot of people. Without the prop they are grasping with their hands and swinging their arms in the wind to grab hold onto something...anything...for support. It is comfortable to rest assured that you have all of the answers and they are all in one book. Wow, that is so great...all the answers for those looking for absolute truth to answer all of their questions. I certainly would not be so bold as to say that I have the answers but I do have questions. I just have found that the answers are not the LC or fundamental inerrant Biblical Christianity. I can cross them off the list. Certainly Christianity has some helpful answers but they are not contained within the context of fundamental Christianity. Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|||
04-22-2015, 09:28 PM | #888 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Here's a little dose of negative thinking in case you've forgotten what it's like: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/conten...worship-nature
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
04-23-2015, 05:44 AM | #889 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
04-23-2015, 12:45 PM | #890 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
This coming from a guy that's a Mormon, who believe there's a planet called Kolob, that's next to the throne of God, and where God likes to come and visit from time to time (or from timeless to timeless, I guess). Can we really take these nutjobs serious? I recently said on the main forum that I've been wrong so many times that I don't trust myself, and that's why I'm so evidence obsessed. Well that goes for everyone else. I don't trust them either. And UntoHim might delighted to learn that I don't trust Professor Bart Ehrman either. But because he's so versed in the Greek texts of the NT, and the manuscripts, and deeply informed on early Christianity, and all the early writings during the apostolic period, and shortly thereafter, I just use Ehrman to learn from ... like I do so many other scholars. And there's something wrong with me. I've got OCD on Jesus, and the like, and enjoy learning all the opinions of these nutjob Christians. Sometimes, like this crazy Beck thing, and Zeek's link, they are more entertaining than Comedy Central. The California drought is cause by pagan nature worship? That's very funny indeed. I'm surprised he didn't claim that the drought is caused by gay marriage, and all the gays in San Fran. Ha ...
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
04-29-2015, 06:34 AM | #891 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
05-04-2015, 08:53 AM | #892 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
An argument against the Bible as the Word of God for your consideration:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/emergen...t-christendom/
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
05-04-2015, 09:44 AM | #893 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And sometimes their conclusions (though the emerginng crown never liked to admit to any conclusions — not postmodern enough if you conclude) are not exactly what the old-school theologians cry out against. While I'm sure that some would disagree, in this article I see a believer in what is in the Bible who does not elevate it above what it is. A source of testimony concerning God. And the Word of God is limited to the person of Jesus Christ. Seems a reasonable conclusion from a reading of the Bible.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
05-04-2015, 10:33 AM | #894 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
05-04-2015, 02:57 PM | #895 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||
05-09-2015, 09:41 AM | #896 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: From the Main Forum
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
05-17-2015, 10:00 PM | #897 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
This article seems to corroborate my hypothesis that sick religion exacerbates negativity bias: http://www.salon.com/2014/11/01/the_..._mind_partner/
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
05-18-2015, 01:24 PM | #898 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Troublesome article. I can agree that the observations noted happen. The thing that they did not attempt to establish is whether the link to religion was causal in some or all cases, or whether it is mere correlated. Or alternately that people who have certain ideas or preferences will find a way to make their religion support it.
And at least part of it comes from a scientific study. No, wait. It is an investigative journalist. If I was trying to discover whether OJ really killed Nicole and what’s his name, that is where I might turn. But to decide whether religion does things to you . . . really? When a paragraph starts with a statement like “because the child’s mind is uniquely susceptible to religious ideas, religious indoctrination particularly targets vulnerable young children” what are we expected to think? The reference is to an article by someone who points to the fact that a group called Child Evangelism Fellowship has targeted children in different cities for summer missions. This does not lend support to the idea that a child’s mind is uniquely susceptible to religion which would seem to be the point the Salon article was trying to make. In fact, that claim is a bare assertion. It might be true that a child’s mind is generally susceptible to all kinds of indoctrination rather than anything that could be labeled as “uniquely.” But that would remove the specific rant against religion and instead recommend against all interactions with children that attempt to sway their thinking about anything — religion, politics, communism, the leader of the country, the Great Satan America, or whatever. There is surely some of all of those things. But that does not make all aspects of religion, politics, country leaders, or even communism something that can only harm young children. Like it or not, they will be influenced during this susceptible time by many things including their parents, environment, school, as well as religion. Then it continues to assert certain things as being simply true. For example, the following paragraph: One requirement for success as a sincere Christian is to find a way to believe that which would be unbelievable under normal rules of evidence and inquiry. Christianity contains concepts that help to safeguard belief, such as limiting outside information, practicing thought control, and self-denigration; but for some people the emotional numbing and intellectual suicide just isn’t enough. In other words, for a significant number of children in Christian families, the religion just doesn’t “take.” This can trigger guilt, conflict, and ultimately rejection or abandonment. Much of the claims in this paragraph may apply to some groups. But Christianity as a general religion is not needing any of this. The statement that “ in other words . . . the religion just doesn’t take” does not necessarily follow. This whole article seems to be based on the presumption that religion in general, and Christianity in specific, is simply a generic falsehood that only operates through tricking people, and most egregiously the young. It is demonstrably true that there are people within all kind of religions, as well as claiming no religion, that do go to lengths to prey on the vulnerable, and in some cases the not-so vulnerable, through all kinds of tricks. Like those links from Google and Yahoo searches that promise to tell you some secret that will make you wiser than those around you only to have to keep waiting through a streaming video/audio where the guy/gal keeps providing factoid after factoid about things you cannot research and — well, I can’t tolerate them enough to get to the place where they think they can finally tell whatever their secret is. Or try to sell it to you. Want to talk about preying on the vulnerable children? How about teaching that homosexuality is just another normal, healthy, acceptable lifestyle and is a function of genetics. (BTW, if it is genetics, then why isn’t it self-limiting due to lack of procreation?) Or that they should be free to simply choose their sexuality because this is a free nation. Or that they can be whatever they want to be — without limitation. I’ll bite on the idea that there are a lot of Fundamentalist groups that come off just like this article says. But this is clearly a rant against Christianity in particular with nothing but what are effectively pages of unsupported statements that could be true somewhere, but are never established as true everywhere, if at all. Before I spend more time following the line of reasoning provided here, I need something that is more than claims that it is so. I spent way too long (even at only 14.5 years of my now 60 years of life) following Lee on the same kind of “because I said it” logic. I sense more of a desire for a scorched-earth cleansing of the world, or at least America, of all vestiges of religion, or at least Christianity. They are so certain that Christianity is the real Great Satan that they are sure that the fact that swearing-in of government officials on a Bible is evidence of the indoctrination that the whole nation has undergone. So rather than like this article as a general collection of truth (which it cannot claim to be), I would rather see real analysis of the specific problems in the specific groups that might actually be like what was written concerning. But washing it over the whole because there might be some truth in it with respect to particular cases just makes their premises not worthy of more than the dismissal I am giving them. Find a rational view rather than a “damn it all” view.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
05-18-2015, 08:20 PM | #899 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Clearly, both of the authors that wrote the Salon article have an ax to grind. From what I can gather Valerie is a former evangelical, and Merelene grew up with missionary parents and accepted Jesus into her heart when she was five years old.
Both are PHDs now. And both write books to help those struggling with growing up in religious homes, concerned most for those struggling with Christianity. If people needing help find it in these authors I'm all for them. As for religion making people crazy, or causing mental health issues, I don't know. I do wonder some times which came first, the chicken or the egg. But in this case, does religion make people crazy, or do people bring crazy to the religion. I don't have the answer. But I'm gonna keep an eye on it, nonetheless. Alas, just that might drive me crazy. If keeping up with Christianity doesn't drive me there first. Let's face it. People are crazy ... Christian or otherwise. PHDs are no exception. We all need all the help we can get. Life is not easy.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. Last edited by awareness; 05-18-2015 at 08:51 PM. |
05-19-2015, 06:28 AM | #900 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
The article's authors don't support their propositions with findings from peer reviewed scientific studies. But, since I witnessed many of these negative practices and outcomes first hand in relation to the Local Churches, their arguments resonated with me. The LCs use authoritarianism, separatism and fear. The article's point about the susceptibility of children to indoctrination is well supported by research in developmental psychology and neuroscience. And indoctrination of young children may have lasting deleterious effects. There is evidence that children with religious backgrounds are less able to discriminate the realistic from the fantastical. http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-28537149 These questions deserve further consideration and research.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
05-19-2015, 06:49 AM | #901 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Case in point -- I think y'all will agree -- take a look at me.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
05-19-2015, 09:41 AM | #902 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Yes, the young are impressionable. In virtually everything. They become fearful of the bomb. Or the shadows in the closet. Or they take the word of a teacher as simply true because they are a teacher. They easily become convinced that the cause of their (or their family's) plight is whatever the older ones tell them it is no matter how true or untrue that may be. Whether it is the evil intervention of the Western world, or the lack of intervention by the Western world. Or the fact of slavery long ago. Or bigotry. Or "those people." Yes. Those People. And every group has someone who qualifies as "those people." It is not exclusively a minority or third world thing. We all want to blame someone else. And the hard part is that there are always some examples where "those people" — or at least certain ones within that group — have actually done what is claimed as generally true. So the example becomes the general truth even when hardly applicable to most (on either side). Yes, the kind of things we endured in the LCM were perfect examples for the article. The LCM is the perfect tempest in a teakettle to study for anomalies and problems. From that perspective, it is potentially useful. But when written as a general diatribe against religion in general simply because there is a religious group (or two or three) that fits nicely does not make its desire to wash the problems of those few across the whole legitimate. Therein lies the problem with the article for me. Its lack of true objectivity makes even some valid observations of specific things hard to take because the goal was not to deal with the specific problem, but to throw everything that had the word "religion" tied to it into the sea. It taints the message as overstated, and since not generally true as claimed, questions whether it is true at all. That is a shame because surely it is true at times.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
05-19-2015, 10:19 AM | #903 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Truth is there are plenty that have the same problems and issues that the authors went thru with Christianity (as I too went thru). All my life Christianity, of some sort or another, as been demonized ; the RCC in the Southern Baptist, and all of Christianity in Lee's LCM. So an article that is critical of Christianity is nothing new to me. Perhaps that's why you are critical of the article. Could it be that you are tired of that worn out trope ... you heard enough of it outta Lee? (Those also not subject to objective peer review.) The internet is like the evolutionary development of the eyeball. Suddenly we can see like never before. And all religions are suffering from it. As a result the young today are turning away from traditional religions. Church coffers are getting lean. The RCC is extremely concerned about that. So they got that lovy-dovy Pope Francis, hoping to save the day with his all inclusive acceptance ... of even gays and atheists ... they got wallets too.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
05-19-2015, 03:22 PM | #904 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
(The following is from almost 9 years ago.) Quote:
But now we have people who more easily get whatever they manage to type out published on the internet. While the posts that go out on a well-known site like one of the newspaper's online editions, or something like the Huffington Post might be still good, I think that everyone has examples where every possible online source has published unadulterated drivel. So when a post goes out that has nothing concrete behind it, and only plays to either the experiences of those who have been through the same (or relatively same) thing, or the fears or prejudices of those who are prone to agree, and you have a new fact for people to quote. I am not diminishing the truth of experiences. But questioning the extent to which it is taken and the conclusions that are made. The problem in this particular case is that it is never actually established that religion in general, or Christianity in specific, is actually anything like what is portrayed. But since it (either religion or Christianity) was in the vicinity, it is stated as being the problem and cause rather than a tool used by the actual problem/cause. And religion is a popular tool because there is an aspect of adherence to religious tenets that is not because of logic or proof, but belief. And belief in something where faith (rather than scientific fact) is required means that you have to be willing to stand for it despite a lack of proof. And then someone comes along and shoehorns in something that you would not be willing to stand for if it weren't for the "fact" that you think it belongs within your belief/faith structure. The problem is like numbers/figures. Figures don't lie, bu liars figure. With respect to the Christian religion, it does not condone the things that result in someone getting so upset about it that they write that kind of article. But it is too easy for the people who would undertake those things to convince some people of faith that their faith insists upon the allowance for such things. Not that directly. Usually indirectly, just like Nee and Lee did. Slowly turn up the heat until you don't realize you are boiling.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
||
05-19-2015, 03:41 PM | #905 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
BTW. The error I mentioned was really unimportant. But it related to the guy standing in line at Starbucks behind another guy and his daughter. On the back of his tee shirt were three strings of 0s and 1s. Suddenly it hit him what it meant and he started laughing. It was the digital representation of the ASCII codes for DAD (or maybe dad, but I can't recall now). The problem was that he had listed the sequence of digits such that they actually spelled ADA. Reversed the codes and messed it up. But he had hit Enter,
The point was not that everything was simply wrong or buggy. But there are no checks and it is out there. And they now say it is forever. And like that stupid insurance commercial, there are a bunch of people who actually think that if it is on the internet, it must be right. And if you say it with enough authority, more will believe it. So I keep my skeptical hat on. (Sometimes it is hard being a Christian skeptic who thinks that apologetics is mainly answering the wrong questions with nothing of substance except the bravado that it is substantial. Especially one who still believes.)
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
05-19-2015, 08:21 PM | #906 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Regarding the proposition that religious indoctrination of young children may have lasting deleterious effects; we will henceforth refer to you as Exhibit A.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
05-19-2015, 08:52 PM | #907 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|||
05-22-2015, 07:32 AM | #908 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Does supernaturalism have a legitimate place in American politics? http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...venant-moskoff
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
05-22-2015, 08:42 AM | #909 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And then maybe Huckabee can find the Urim and Thummim too, will be able to use their powers of divination to see into the future, and then bring world peace, and prosperity, to all the world. As I see it the only hope for mankind is either more evolution (much more) or supernatural intervention. And evolution is so slow I fear we'll do ourselves in before it ever gets us there, if ever. So therefore it's left up to God. May disappointment in Huck the bee is that he's a Baptist (that's just me). But as the acting MOTA here I've got to ask ... if politics should be accepted in AltVs? Politics is madness ... and extreme Kabuki theater ... and would make us all mad. Please ... Let's not go there. But finding the Ark of the Covenant, cuz it would validate the holy word of God, is acceptable here. It's fair game. But is it important to fundamentalism?
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-05-2015, 06:54 PM | #910 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Texas Takes Lead in Bible Belt
"In essence, Christian conservatives in Texas have successfully forced a false historical narrative into public school textbooks that portray Moses as an influence on the Constitution and the Old Testament as the root of democracy." - See more at: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progres....RFtyNEp8.dpuf
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-06-2015, 06:37 AM | #911 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
So we are left with the Christian conservatives, the private militias, the radical liberals, the racists and the race-card carriers, etc., to suggest agendas and see them through. And since they are the ones rising to make their positions, anyone who even sort of looks like them is presumed to be party to it. Yet those small groups really do it all. If the over-the-top Christian right steps in to argue school textbook content and no one else shows up in significant numbers, they carry the day. What is needed in this particular case is a larger voice from the Christians who do not agree with either the positions being pushed or the very claim that it is a Christian position. But we find that those Christians are just as silent as the moderate, peace-loving Muslims.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
06-06-2015, 08:37 PM | #912 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
There are, I think, groups of evangelicals seeking to place evangelicals in every branch of government at every level. I say I think because some 10 yrs ago or so I remember reading about them. And Texas textbooks appears to be an example of "fringe types" having sway. Texas is the 2nd largest buyer of textbooks, behind California.. It's expensive to produced textbooks so publishers like to make them nationally as uniform as possible. So Texas textbooks shape textbooks nationally. Same for California textbooks. It's a textbook culture war. Texas on the far right and California on the far left. Moreover, California introduces laws to stop Texas textbooks from leaking into theirs, and Texas does its best to keep Cal. textbooks out of theirs. Both affect textbooks around the nation. If we characterize Texas as controlled by a bunch of crazy "fringe" Christians how should we characterize those granola bar Californians? Aren't they both just different types of fundamentalism? One religious fundamentalism and the other secular fundamentalism?
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-08-2015, 04:59 AM | #913 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I know. I'm borrowing from one or more of those right-wing talk show hosts. But they are busy trying to stir us up to be part of the extreme right. But if only the extreme right and the extreme left are setting the agenda, then that is all the rest have to consider. The only way it changes is for a significant faction that is on neither extreme joins the fray and takes on the hollow rhetoric of the extremists. Until that happens, only the far right and the far left are even represented in the process. And when it comes time to vote, only they have people and ideas on the ballot.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
06-08-2015, 07:00 AM | #914 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Really? What's the same about them. You haven't said.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||
06-08-2015, 07:16 AM | #915 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/201...9sL/story.html
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
06-08-2015, 08:35 AM | #916 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
WFC = suppressed science and regressed ideas Secularism = encourages scientific discovery and renewed thoughts and ideas WFC = biblical literalism in interpretation Secularism = encourages fresh perspectives in Christian thought WFC = nationalism Secularism = pluralism Etc
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
06-08-2015, 08:41 AM | #917 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Texas #2 buyer of textbooks, Cal. #1
Quote:
Quote:
Stay on subject bro ...
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
||
06-08-2015, 08:47 AM | #918 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But only if we look around here in America (maybe). The threat is secular fundamentalism http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/04/op...5938.html?_r=0
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-08-2015, 10:44 AM | #919 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
06-08-2015, 10:48 AM | #920 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Besides, not all issues on the left are supported by all persons on the left. Just like all positions on the right are not supported by all persons on the right. The majority of us live somewhere toward the middle. But raise the right issue, and many of us start to move toward one extreme or the other. But not necessarily on the same issues. You can try to assert that the left doesn't do that, but it might just be blinders to their positions, or too much foaming at the mouth from the talk show hosts and their constant missteps. But there is a difference between gay rights and insistence on gay marriage. Marriage has had a definition for longer than anyone has spoken any of the languages that we now speak in the Western world have existed. Way longer. But in America, there are automatic privileges that come with being married, some of which are never granted to anyone else (at least I think this is true). For the same privileges to be granted wholesale to those who want to have some kind of gay union would be possible without insisting on changing the very meaning of the word "marriage." Yet that is exactly what is happening. Do I care? Yes and no. "No" in that I am willing to tolerate equal legal status. And "No" in that I do not have the position of insisting on definitions. But "Yes" in that I believe that the intent of calling it marriage is more than granting equal legal status, but is designed to force not only tolerance, but outright acceptance as moral and just — so much so that it qualifies as "marriage." And there I disagree. Just one example. And it is a left issue/position. The whole idea that only those on the conservative side of things are willing to become dogmatic and try to insist that everyone do it their way or be labeled as criminals is hogwash. That is exactly what the extreme gay agenda is about. It is about criminalizing the fact that you don't simply think like they do and agree that they are right. This does not exonerate the extreme right. But while we have labeled the right as the fundamentalists, the left can and does act in the exact same manner. And they have their fundamentals that they insist that everyone follow or be deemed morally deficient. And therefore potentially subject to the forfeiture of liberty and property. Hasn't come to life yet (that I am aware of).
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
06-08-2015, 10:58 AM | #921 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
For now I'm spotting in your response a resemblance between white Christian fundamentalism and Turkish secular fundamentalism, in attempts to control free thinking. That's my point.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-08-2015, 12:05 PM | #922 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
First you jumped to the conclusion that Texas was "fundamentalist", then you reasoned illogically from that that since California buys more text books than Texas they are fundamentalist too. Get logical bro...
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-08-2015, 12:10 PM | #923 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Who's arguing that? Not me.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-08-2015, 02:59 PM | #924 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Face it ... life ... and especially religion ... is not logical. Sorry for that.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
06-08-2015, 03:17 PM | #925 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
You did question where the left was setting any agendas. Hard to think it meant anything else. But maybe it was just an argument for argument's sake, therefore not really your argument.
Starting to sound a little like that acknowledgement of the person who was playing the player piano in The Music Man: "Thanks to [whoever], our fine player piano player, piano, player . . . piano . . . player . . . piano . . . ."
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
06-08-2015, 03:37 PM | #926 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
The following interchange went on between awareness and zeek:
Quote:
But for me, it is the generalization that all of either Texas or California is anything (probably more of awareness' position) that is annoying. Yes, California has had Republican governors. But their Republican governors couldn't likely get the religious fundamentalists behind them in a national election. (And that might be just alright by me.) Meanwhile, the religious Fundamentalists in Texas get their way on textbooks because they are the only ones raising their voice other than a lone voice in the wilderness here or there. From where I sit, I don't think the Fundamentalists are the majority of Texas. I would agree that most of Texas (ignoring the People's Republic of Austin) tends more conservative. And there may be a somewhat disproportionate amount that are survivalist, gay-bashing, John Birchers. But that might be because we look at it in terms of the amount of noise that the number of such people in one of the most populous states makes relative to the number in, say, Vermont or Rhode Island. Yeah. Bad examples for my comparison. The issue is that the comparison may be the number in one state v the number in another when that is not the relevant statistic. In any case, it wouldn't matter if either of those was 60% right-wing wackos because we wouldn't really notice because there are still so few of them.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
06-08-2015, 03:48 PM | #927 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
But you did say:
Texas Takes Lead in Bible Belt "Christian conservatives in Texas have successfully forced a false historical narrative into public school textbooks." When you plant a seed you can't expected it not to grow.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
06-08-2015, 08:32 PM | #928 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
06-08-2015, 08:37 PM | #929 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
It in no way follows from that fact that there is a Fundamentalist Left.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-08-2015, 09:17 PM | #930 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
About religion in the public sphere, philosopher Jurgen Habermas, had this to say in his book: "Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays":
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
06-08-2015, 10:15 PM | #931 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Consider the lilies?
"How Big Business Invented the Theology of 'Christian Libertarianism' and the Gospel of Free Markets The inside history of how Evangelical preachers were used to infuse society with the economic dogma that plagues us today." http://www.alternet.org/belief/salva...s-faith?src=fb
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-09-2015, 07:22 AM | #932 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But there are secularist extremists, that act just as dogmatic as those they denigrate. Bro Dave thought my argument about secular fundamentalism in Turkey was weak. Here's another: Secular fundamentalists are the new totalitarians: "There's an aspiring totalitarianism in Britain which is brilliantly disguised. It's disguised because the would-be dictators - and there are many of them - all pretend to be more tolerant than thou. They hide alongside the anti-racists, the anti-homophobes and anti-sexists. But what they are really against is something very different. They - call them secular fundamentalists - are anti-God, and what they really want is the eradication of religion, and all believers, from the face of the earth." http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...ment.religion1
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-09-2015, 07:29 AM | #933 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
What do you think about this proposition?
"Jesus didn’t care about being nice or tolerant, and neither should you." https://theorthodoxlife.wordpress.co...er-should-you/
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-09-2015, 07:53 AM | #934 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-09-2015, 09:01 AM | #935 |
Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον For God So Loved The World
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,793
|
Re: Fundamentalism
This Matt Walsh fellow needs to stop worrying about others and hear "A Tender Word for Pharisees" to see what Jesus has to say to him. (only a little more than half an hour) Many Christian "fundamentalists" need to have their relationship with God healed and set right before they set about trying to adjust others.
__________________
αὐτῷ ἡ δόξα καὶ τὸ κράτος εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων ἀμήν - 1 Peter 5:11 |
06-09-2015, 10:34 AM | #936 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Here are govt left and right which were extreme fundamentalist: Soviet Union-Communism-Left fundamentalist China-Communism-left fundamentalist Germany-nazism-right fundamentalism Italy-under Mussolini-right fundamentalism Japan-WWII-right fundamentalism There has been a rising white Christian fundamentalism that has been evolving in the U.S. politically in both houses of congress and in state houses. On issues such as equal rights regarding marriage and marijuana use liberal rights have shown some strength but not as a left or secular fundamentalist movement. In any case, the U.S. has basic human rights as the pinnacle of its democracy and you can measure "fundamentalism" as those who wage intellectual/political war against those rights.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
06-09-2015, 12:25 PM | #937 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Theodicy: Pat Robertson to grieving mom: “Your dead baby could have grown up to be a Hitler or Stalin.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=96&v=nmeH0s3H68I
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-09-2015, 06:58 PM | #938 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
And nothing against Matt Walsh but after reading his blog entry I came away thinking, wondering if, ol' Matt went to the Bible to make Jesus in his own image. Can't hold it against Matt. Piper does that too. If I hold it against them, methinks I'd have to hold it against everyone ... including myself. Pretty much everyone does it. And those that don't -- make Jesus in their own image -- are suspect.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-10-2015, 08:51 AM | #939 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Okay back to fundamentalism. Secular fundamentalism in particular.
Secular fundamentalists like to look down on religions because of their fundamentalists. Liberals look at conservatives the same way. To them only conservatives have fundamentalists. Neither the secular's or the liberal's think they are afflicted with fundamentalism. I posit that that is not so; that fundamentalism is a human condition ; a personality type, if you will. Bro Dave shot down my Turkey secular fundamentalism. And my British example too ... claiming America is different and so can't suffer from secular fundamentalism. I agree fundamentalism, of any sort, is hard to put our finger on. We've proven that on this thread. We've beat that horse, buried it, dug it up, and beat it again, and still didn't completely nail it down. It's the same for secular fundamentalism. It's hard to put our finger on. But I'd say we do have examples of it here in America, at least evidence of the possibility of it. I'd say the atheists that are putting up billboards are likely examples of being secular fundamentalists. https://www.google.com/search?q=athe...FYwYrAodUqQADQ We're also graced with Dan Barker. A evangelical Pentecostal preacher of 19 years turned atheist. He and his wife started The Freedom From Religion Foundation, that has brought many lawsuits against Christians invading government. Barker also joined hands with Richard Dawkins to start The Clergy Project (British secular fundamentalism exported to America?) So I think we do have examples of secular fundamentalism here in America.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
06-10-2015, 09:20 AM | #940 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I just love how liberals boast in their "tolerance," yet have no tolerance for those who believe in Jesus, loving to brand them all as "radical, right-wing, gun-loving, fundamentalists." I like to question what they actually "tolerate," and I quickly learn that what they tolerate is all the things the Bible warns us about. Liberalism is basically just another religion requiring blind faith in things which God disagrees with. The latest liberal bandwagon is cop hate. It's called the "Ferguson effect." Wait till 911 operators start asking whether the caller is a liberal or not. Ooops, I guess they already are, since the police are not answering calls in certain neighborhoods.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
06-10-2015, 12:13 PM | #941 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I don't think you can place all the police into one category for the actions of a few. Unfortunately it appears that a few police have been getting by with some unsavory actions but now with cameras everywhere they can't keep it up. Some things have to change but I don't think it will happen overnight and I am opposed as anyone should be to the lawlessness that happens when a perceived injustice happens in a city. I just don't think that there is a simple answer and I don't believe that Jesus would tell the police to arm themselves and shoot em all down. I think he would approach the situation in a way that understands the suffering that people have gone through and try and quiet the situation with peace and understanding. http://churchintoronto.blogspot.com/...should-be.html http://churchintoronto.blogspot.com/...?q=nigel+tomes
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
06-10-2015, 02:44 PM | #942 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
If there are secular fundamentalists, then what are their fundamentals?
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-10-2015, 03:14 PM | #943 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Problem with link.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-10-2015, 04:38 PM | #944 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
There's prolly many different answers to this question, but here's a list of declared fundamentals of secular fundamentalists: The secular fundamentalist believes the following things:http://www.theamericanconservative.c...undamentalism/ [Ken, I delivered mine today - Ha]
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-10-2015, 05:23 PM | #945 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Talk about twisting up my words.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
06-10-2015, 05:41 PM | #946 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
A-ware c'mon man. This is either conservative hyperbole or some kind of satirical sh*t. Get serious. The Christian fundamentalists went on record and declared the five fundamentals. This is an ironic criticism of liberalism.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-11-2015, 07:03 AM | #947 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
The five fundamentals sprang up because the fundamentalists felt under threat by science and modernity. They obviously felt they were about to die out. Where are secular fundamentalists under threat, by what, and are they about to die out? I'll keep looking ...
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-11-2015, 10:16 AM | #948 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
06-14-2015, 05:07 AM | #949 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Yes. They may not hold to their unprovable/unfalsifiable thoughts with the kind of zeal of religious fundamentalists, but they are certain enough that their version is more likely than the religious ones that they will scoff at one set while suggesting the other is more likely.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
06-14-2015, 07:05 AM | #950 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Yes it was. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalism
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
||
06-14-2015, 07:58 AM | #951 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
What is fundamentalism? According to Reza Aslan “Fundamentalism is a singular outlook in a pluralistic world.”
What is secular fundamentalism? The "Urban Dictionary defines secular fundamentalism as “the adherence to anti-religious ideology that militantly ridicules, mocks, scorns and satirizes he idea of the existence of a deity or deities and or religion, indifferent of feelings of bigotry, intolerance, hatred and persecution that adherents feel as a result.” I find it no surprise that when the idea of secular fundamentalism comes up Dawkins is ushered into the discussion; like he's king of the secular fundamentalists; their fearless leader; their "SFOTA" (Secular Fundamentalist Of The Age), in LCD jargon. But Dawkins is just a cartoon. He's not as honest about it as Christopher Hitchens was, nor as cuddly. Hitchens was smart, and good with words, AND he had a comedic wit. He made atheism attractive, and funny. Not that Dawkins can't be seen as a joke. Okay let's get down to where the claim of secular fundamentalism is being slung about in earnest: Dave will be happy. It's not in America. ""In the United States, the Constitution protects the freedom of individuals to express their deeply held religious beliefs. In France, the law protects the individual’s freedom to not to have to see others express their religion."" France is called "the most hyper-secular state on the continent." So France might better earn the SFOTA status. They do seem to be the most assertive and aggressive about it. "In 2010, the National Assembly of France passed a bill banning the covering of the face - a law whose sole intent was to deny Muslim women the right to wear a burqa or veil. In 2013 a nursery school assistant was fired for refusing to remove her Islamic veil. A poll taken shortly thereafter found that 84 percent of French citizens oppose the wearing of the Islamic veil or even the headscarf." As a result, French Muslims are calling France a secular fundamentalist state. I'll let y'all read about it yourselves. All my quotes come from one link. It's a must read for secular fundamentalists still denying the existence of secular fundamentalism. And it does present examples of American secular fundamentalism. http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns...ism-2063476376 Is there concern that secular fundamentalism is coming to America: “Christian convictions are under attack as never before,” [future Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee] said in the call, which was meant to rally pastors to participate in the [Family Research Council]'s upcoming “Stand for Marriage” event. “Not just in our lifetime, but ever before in the history of this great nation. We are moving rapidly towards the criminalization of Christianity.” http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/0...f-Christianity
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
06-15-2015, 06:54 AM | #952 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
06-15-2015, 07:51 AM | #953 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-15-2015, 08:53 AM | #954 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Notice that DPD's never own up to their own disorder; they always like to project the disorder upon others. On this forum the DPD's like to go after those who believe in the veracity of the Bible, and particularly the virgin birth of Jesus and the inerrancy of scripture. For example, I happen to live next to an elderly "gentleman" who is a dogmatic tree-hater. He might have THPD because he likes to spread his dogma to the other neighbors on the street. Unfortunately the guy who lived here before me was a tree lover with TLPD and planted 28 trees on my lot, or so I have been repeatedly told. My dear neighbor wants his lawn looking like Yankee stadium, and trees happen to be his "unforgivable" sins.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
06-16-2015, 12:25 PM | #955 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
So far, I have not been known to eat inorganic food. Yet much of what I eat is labeled as "not organic" according to the current use in product labeling. Fundamentalism should be the adherence to fundamentals. That is what it was. But it has become the pejorative term by identifying it with the kind of actions of some of the people who are among those who adhere (or at least think they adhere) to those fundamentals. So the pejorative version of fundamentalism has nothing to do with the fundamentals, but rather to the actions which also have nothing to do with those fundamentals, but are undertaken by some who claim them. The label becomes disconnected with respect to its namesake and is easily used in reference to others who engage in similar behavior in different arenas. When we talk about fundamentalist Islam, we are seldom speaking of fundamentals of Islam, but of the extreme positions of people who are claiming Islam as their source for those positions. If that works, then it should be little different to apply the same kind of thinking to those at the opposite extremes on the same subjects. As the introduction to a Tom Lehrer song in the 60s said, "I know there are people in the world that do not love their fellow human beings . . . and I hate people like that." Now it is surely better to have different labels for different positions. But is the problem the position that is taken, or it is the way in which it is taken? Is the problem the fundamentals, or is it the dogmatic way that some ignore other aspects of the Christian calling to fight for those fundamentals. To go to war over how inerrant the Bible is or isn't. To curse at people who do not claim to be Christian for having morals that they think a Christian should not have. All in the name of a God who says to love your neighbor as yourself. And it seems little different when people on the secular side of the divide do not consider anything from a Christian source but rather mock it. Deride it as not worthy of existing. All coming from people who claim that even the baby seals should be protected. But not the Christians. Or their beliefs.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
|
06-16-2015, 06:18 PM | #956 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
06-17-2015, 04:24 AM | #957 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,382
|
Re: Fundamentalism
I almost included that one. Oddly, many years ago, a coworker mentioned that a very liberal friend of hers had decided that if she was going to defend the rights of baby seals and other animals, she would have to also defend the rights of unborn humans. A little sanity in the midst of chaos.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
06-17-2015, 05:52 AM | #958 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
06-17-2015, 07:14 AM | #959 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
So should we add "personhood" to our list of Christian fundamentals?
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
06-17-2015, 08:32 AM | #960 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Many conservatives want it both ways. They don't want to pay for all of the babies that would be born if there were no abortions (they are against gov't payouts such as welfare, Medicaid etc) but they are against abortions. Do you really want poor families to have 15 kids? You know you are against that yet you don't have a solution except for extreme measures such as sterilization. The Catholics oppose any contraception and I guess you would also. There are more admonitions against the rich in the NT than against those who are poor. Therein is your argument. Jesus had more empathy for the poor and that is where we must agree. Do you really think that people who have some money are going to these abortion clinics? It is the poor people for numerous reasons...to include they can't afford it.... If they had a better life situation they would keep the baby and take care of it. It is mostly (not always) about wealth or in some cases mental illness etc. Do you want a mentally ill woman taking care of 15 kids...guess what her kids will be doing when they get older. Be part of the solution and not part of the problem!
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
06-17-2015, 09:46 AM | #961 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
The only thing of value was your opening line about a "legitimate concern." Go read some actual history about Roe/McCorvey and the lies presented to the SCOTUS, instead of Planned Parenthood sales literature. Christians have given millions and millions to educate and assist young girls. Because of the lack of babies to adopt, loving Christian families have even gone around the world to adopt, often taking the what liberals called "unwanted." It's so easy for rich liberals like you to sit back and place responsibility for every social problem on others.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
06-17-2015, 11:10 AM | #962 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Sorry bro Ohio ... I'm pro-choice and chose no abortion, when I have an actual say. And I've been there. Also, my son is one that had no option but the military. That hits close to home too. They recently trained him how to bring any man down with one blow ... and he's signed on to die, if so ordered. I'm pro-choice and chose not to abort at any age; if I have a say ... and I don't. How can humans be so intelligent, and even religious, and yet so savage? Is it because they look up to a savage God? or have they, as OBW pointed out, created God in their own savage image ... and put it in the Bible?
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-17-2015, 12:53 PM | #963 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
War affects the rich and the poor. Read your history books. Mao, Hitler, and Stalin didn't use religion (except for the occult, but we won't mention that) to fight their wars, and they were the bloodiest tyrants of the 20th century. But ... what the heck ... the crusades were sponsored by Rome a thousand years ago ... so let's blame Jesus Christ too! And who told you that pro-lifers couldn't care less for the born? Talk about stereotypical liberal characterizations of Christians.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
06-17-2015, 01:03 PM | #964 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 4,330
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Abortion rights laws exist because some people are highly offended that there would be any cost attached to sex, especially the cost of babies. My gosh, what the heck was God thinking when he made something as fun as sex come with the cost of having children!? We're entitled to have sex at no cost! Only a savage God would make it otherwise!
We are certainly entitled to get rid of unwanted pregnancies so we can get back having fun, no-cost sex! What savage says otherwise?! Must be some blighted conservative. |
06-17-2015, 08:55 PM | #965 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
06-17-2015, 10:09 PM | #966 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
As I look at this world at 10 Billion people and growing I know that it is not sustainable e.g. water, food, environment (China's efforts at only allowing one kid per couple hasn't slowed things down and neither has India's efforts at controlling the number of babies---like you said--sex is just too much fun). I am not advocating that abortion is a real solution either and Ohio has his facts wrong again. The poor use hangers and the rich use money to obtain abortions if we don't have Roe vs Wade. The conservatives can spend billions on an election but they can't spend enough money to take care of all the babies out of wedlock for the poor but they will spend money on their own out-of-wedlock babies and yet oppose abortion at the same time. It is this fundamental difference of believing that the poor are the way they are because they don't work hard enough or don't make sufficient effort to do more. As a result "some" conservatives believe they don't deserve handouts.....e.g. Limbaugh and his piglets metaphor. Whatever happened to what Jesus taught? At one point he said "the poor you have with you always" but that was when he was nearing the point of going to be crucified. It wasn't an indictment on poor people. His actions towards the poor was universally hopeful and helpful. This is not about abortion. It is about how the poor are treated in a country that has more money than anyone can imagine and we can't get our poor out of poverty. Notice how much tax dollars are spent on subsidies for farmers, for example, who have consistently abused this privilege because of their powerful farmer lobby. When I was at a "dining with dignity" dinner where we feed the homeless I couldn't help but notice that there were several moderate SUVs with people bringing their children to eat and this was going on at the food pantry as well. These were people who lost jobs during the 2008 recession who hadn't been able to get back on their feet. This has changed over the past few years as more jobs have been created. However, if we don't take care of those who have little it won't matter how much we shout "Hallelujah" because if God doesn't judge us for our negligence then something is terribly wrong.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
06-18-2015, 06:07 AM | #967 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Yep, that was the message Jesus brought to mankind!
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
06-18-2015, 07:23 AM | #968 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Conservatives who bring their religion to politics want to keep religion out of politics when the religious view differs from theirs: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/20...=fb-share&_r=0
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-18-2015, 08:02 AM | #969 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
How in the world would you know my facts are wrong when you have never studied anything except liberal spin?
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
06-18-2015, 12:33 PM | #970 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Of course you really know nothing about my background except what I have listed regarding the LC. I listened to Limbaugh for almost a year, read mostly conservative points of view at the time etc. I have looked at the dark side to understand their point of view. Your point of view is all over the map and inconsistent with the more radical conservatives which may be a good thing.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
06-18-2015, 12:47 PM | #971 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Jesus never spoke to this issue so we have to use "thou shalt not kill" as our example and then we get into the entire debate as to when does the fetus become a baby which I have no interest in getting into. The other anomaly in this discussion is that the poor and minorities are the most likely to be on death row. However, when it comes to "thou shalt not kill" the conservatives line up on the other side and want these death row inmates killed off as fast as possible all the while fighting abortion rights. All of this is interesting in the context of Witness Lee and the LC. I don't think they ever took a stand on any of this and maybe you or someone knows their position. My take on it is that you pray read, call Oh Lord Jesus and follow your conscience but there are perimeters---maybe unspoken perimeters.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
06-18-2015, 12:58 PM | #972 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Here's one for you -- I see nothing wrong with poor surrogate moms having babies for those who cannot have children of their own, and are willing to pay for such services, and many adopters are. So if some poor girl, like you mentioned before, had 15 children as a surrogate mom, think about how good that is -- everybody is a winner! Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
||||
06-18-2015, 01:47 PM | #973 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But there are those on the Protestant side of the isle that think the catholic church is wrong; that hold against abortion and also hold to, at the same time, "an eye for an eye" on the death penalty. I just consider the inconsistent pro-lifers as right-wing nutjobs. Jesus, the one in the gospels (not the one in the book of Revelation) would put the ear back on. But lots of Christians, even the RCC, want Jesus to come back and pour out bowls of wrath on everybody, even on the fetuses. Lots of Christians are crazy like that.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-18-2015, 03:02 PM | #974 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 4,330
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Dave,
That the rich can do certain things does not mean that the poor ought to be able to do them. If the rich can get away with driving Lamborghinis at 180mph does that mean the poor have the right to speed? If the rich can get away with insider trading does that mean the poor have the right to steal? Just because it's easier for the rich to cover their sins is no reason to stop calling it sin where the poor are concerned. I mean, that kind of logic does not hold. I wasn't making the case that abortion should be illegal. I was just stating the real reason it is legal. Poor people using coat hangers to abort babies is just a way to slather some morality on it. The real reason is people can't deal with the weighty responsibilities of the privileges God has given us, and that includes the poor. At least be honest enough to admit that. But trying to argue that abortion should be legal because the rich have more attractive options in that regard is spurious. Here's the thing about the poor. I believe in helping them and I do. But there is a reason they are called the poor. They are poor because they lack advantages, not the other way around. If they didn't lack advantages they wouldn't be poor anymore. Get it? So when you are outraged that the poor lack advantages it's like being outraged that fire is hot. Tell us something we don't know. |
06-18-2015, 04:11 PM | #975 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
A nut-job is one who considers the murder of innocent unborn children to be totally justified, and yet is convinced that capital punishment for convicted serial murderers is totally unjustified.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
06-18-2015, 07:13 PM | #976 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
So we have two sets of nutjobs.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
06-19-2015, 07:07 AM | #977 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Talk about nutjobs I saw on Fox that the 9 killed in the church is an attack on Christianity.
If so Christianity thrives when under attack. When the boys at Princeton cooked up the five fundamentals it was because they thought Christianity, and the Bible, were under attack. Oops ... forgot to link a video. I found it on the web: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/0...arm-themselves
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. Last edited by awareness; 06-19-2015 at 10:58 AM. |
06-19-2015, 07:58 PM | #978 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Jesus taught "Resist not evil." Should we take him seriously? http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2...arolina-church
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-21-2015, 07:31 PM | #979 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
As a result of the talk at the UU today (although this was by no means the main topic) I was thinking about what Nee and Lee taught us and most fundamentalists hold dear to their hearts: We are all sinners because we are born with a sinful nature. The only thing we can do is sin because it is our nature because Adam ate the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. It is thus only the blood of Jesus and death and resurrection of Christ which can give us access to God, forgive us our sins and address our sinful nature and take us to the heavenly kingdom. Without that we are doomed to a life of sin without any hope.
What made me think of this (as well as a recent visit to the WWII museum in NO) is what is proclaimed as demonstrated by all the evil (sin) in the world today---killings, chopping off of heads, slaughter of innocents etc. Of course, since WWII what we have seen is nothing comparatively---20 million Russians, 6 million Jews etc...in all it is estimated that 60 million people were killed in WWII (soldiers and innocents). You can add all the AIDS victims, Eboli, 9/11, earthquakes, Darfar, Uganda, Iraq, Afghanistan etc and you don't come close to the deaths in WWII. However, evil is seen everywhere. One of the reasons today is "media". Everything is instant--no lapse in time...the internet brings everything to our lives almost at the moment it happens and the detail can be beyond our imagination. My point is this---the good that is being done in this world is staggering despite the idea that man is lost and sinful. But good is not media friendly. Sure, we'll hear about someone who does a good deed periodically but most of it is lost because hearing about evil captures our imagination more quickly and thoroughly. I can use NFL football as an example of our country---you almost exclusively hear about the few of the 1700 NFL players who abuse women or children and not the majority of players who work to improve their communities. As long as we play the "sin" tag and focus on sin in people that is what we will see in people and not the goodness of people or the hope. Certainly we are products of our environment and "nature" but if we are only exposed to people talking about the evil of sin that will be our focus in life. This is the basic question: are we really born in sin as Paul wrote in the NT or as WN and WL believed? This issue, from my perspective, is one of the underlying problems with WL and WN teachings and leads to most of the detrimental issues in the LC. Of course, the ultimate is the book of Revelation which will bring more damnation than one can imagination on the face of the earth for all the sinfulness so let's focus on what hell we are in for as described in the book of Revelation. No estimation of how many will be burned, slaughtered etc but it should beat the 60 million from WWII.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
06-24-2015, 05:26 AM | #980 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
06-24-2015, 06:30 AM | #981 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
I was steeped in WN when I met Karl Hammond in SC even though I was attending Bible college. However, after reading the NCL and other books by Nee I was still asking myself the question how is this practically worked out? When I discovered the LC I was thinking ....here it is --- getting away from the letter to the spirit and the life through pray-reading and calling on the Lord...eating and drinking Christ...wow... However, what brought me at least to that point was the NCL which dealt with "sins" and our sinful nature which causes us to commit sins. The ground of the LC was just a practical way to bring us all together and make it work. In addition, looking back to the summer of 1965 I was working for my uncle in Detroit (Albert) when I was off from college and he was familiar with Nee as well. We were both going around saying "I live, yet not I, but Christ lives in me" a Biblical quote taken from Nee's NCL. It was based on the interpretation that Christ needed to grow and live in us and the more He grew in us the more we would be Christ-like but not because we were trying to be Christ like but because he was growing in us and dealing with or "replacing" our fallen sinful nature. Again, this led to the Godmen interpretation by Lee and the attraction of the LC back when I was involved. It also led to the exclusivity and the intense feeling that we were better than everyone else. Everything else followed. At least that is how I see it as I reflect back on this issue. It is Nee/Lee's interpretation of original sin and how our fallen nature was interpreted by WN/WL and our belief that they held some "doctrinal knowledge/spirituality which was beyond what other Christians were familiar which led to the critical problems of the LC.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
06-24-2015, 05:20 PM | #982 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
How close were Nee and Lee to Paul's concept of sin? For Paul sin was personified as an enemy power. Thus, according to Romans 5: 12, sin ‘entered the world’; after that ‘sin reigned in death’ (5: 21); sin may ‘reign’ in our bodies (6: 12) or ‘have dominion’ over us (6: 14); sin takes advantage of the commandment and ‘wrought in me all kinds of covetousness’ (7: 8); it ‘revived’ (7: 9); found ‘opportunity in the commandment, deceived me and by it killed me’ (7: 11); and it ‘worked death in me through what is good’ (7: 13). sin may be served (6: 16–18), and consequently it enslaves us (6: 20). In other words, sin is a ‘law’ which lurking in within us and preventing the fulfilling of the law of God (7: 17–23). I think the concept of Nee and Lee are very close to this. Don't you?
But Lee goes even further than Paul to personify sin. For example, in the Life Study of Romans, Chapter 13 Section 2 Lee says: Quote:
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
06-24-2015, 11:07 PM | #983 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Personally I think telling children that they were born with original sin is instilling a unhealthy self image in them; especially if, to the extreme, if they are told they are totally depraved -- as very conservative fundamentalists are wont to do. If you ask me the notion is really meant to scare children, toward Jesus. I've read that when Christian missionaries go into a primitive tribe the first thing they need to teach them is that their mythology is of the devil, and that they are sinners. No sinner, means no need for salvation. No need for salvation means no need for Jesus. So ... if there's no original sin there's no need for Jesus. If you don't believe in original sin you may as well be a atheist. I'll revisit Lee's extra-Biblical exegesis on the Tree, Satan, and Sin, perchance, if the Spirit moves me, in another post.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-25-2015, 10:51 AM | #984 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
But, I think "original sin" provides a metaphysical mechanism for sin that goes beyond Paul. And, after all, where is the basis for it in the Hebrew Bible for Paul to go on? But, lack of the concept of original sin didn't make atheists out of the Hebrews or others , so your conclusion that "If you don't believe in original sin you may as well be a atheist." is unfounded.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
|
06-25-2015, 05:38 PM | #985 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
If they had accepted Jesus they would have come to know of their original sin. Or would they? Did Jesus even teach original sin?
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-25-2015, 10:56 PM | #986 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Of course not. Jesus of Nazareth was a wisdom sage not a systematic theologian. That concept would await the eminent Professor Augustine of Hippo. Don't be misled by the Gospel of John. That one is a theological treatise that puts the narrator's reflection on the Christ into the mouth of Jesus much like Plato is thought to have put his own philosophy in the mouth of Socrates in the later dialogues. It isn't literal history because the author evidently didn't intend for it to be.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-25-2015, 11:34 PM | #987 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/06/pat-...-racist-fears/
Who knew how insightful Pat Boone could be? "Boone dismisses the massacre of nine black worshipers last week by an avowed white supremacist as a “satanically inspired” attack against Christians." I guess that pretty much lets the perpetrator off the hook. He was the innocent victim of Satanic monkey business. Had nothing to do with racism. It was just the latest violent leak in the ever-faulty 2000 year old Satanic system.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
06-26-2015, 07:09 AM | #988 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Boone is just echoing the latest theme at Fox News, that, Christianity is under attack. In fact, when the shooting at the church broke in the news that is exacting what Fox claimed it was. The attack happened at a Christian church, so that has to have been what motivated Roof, to Fox ... before it came out it was all about race, and white supremacy ... and that Roof grew up a practicing Christian. Christians, apparently gathering from these reports, so like to play the victim. Maybe they have a persecution complex, from reading their Bible. Plus, if we just look away from racism it won't exist any more. Isn't that what the loony Pat Boony is saying ... Mr. President?
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
06-26-2015, 09:18 AM | #989 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 641
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
"Although man was created good, the evil nature of Satan was injected into his body when he partook of the fruit of the tree of knowledge. The tree of knowledge denoted Satan, the evil one, who has the power of death. Thus, when man ate of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, Satan came into his body. Satan’s principle, the factor of every evil thing, is the law of sin." The evil nature of Satan was injected into our bodies so in a sense "the Devil made me do it" has a certain ring to it. Every evil thing is the law of sin. You see, we were created "good"...wow...but Adam ate fruit from the tree of knowledge and Satan was injected into us and we are now "bad". Created good by God but now bad because Adam ate the wrong fruit. Of course, God has been working overtime trying to get us back to the "good" that we were in the beginning but it is taking him thousands of years. Plus, He tried to work through the Israelite people but they let him down constantly so He had to send His own Son to straighten things out. Anyway, as I stated earlier WL's perspective on sin has led the LC into the wilderness from which they will never return. As I noted before, for me, it all began with my reading of WN's book NCL leading me into the LC and it all goes back to WL/WN's concept of sin.
__________________
LC 1969-1978 Santa Cruz, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami |
|
06-29-2015, 02:31 PM | #990 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Is divide between evolutionists and creationists basically a matter of intuitive vs. analytic cognitive styles?
http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/201...ntent=20150629
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
07-03-2015, 08:54 PM | #991 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
"John Boswell was a historian and religious Catholic who dedicated much of his scholarly life to studying the late Roman Empire and early Christian Church. Poring over legal and church documents from this era, he discovered something incredible. There were dozens of records of church ceremonies where two men were joined in unions that used the same rituals as heterosexual marriages."
http://io9.com/gay-marriage-in-the-y...0108/953627434
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
07-04-2015, 08:43 AM | #992 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 117
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
We men and I think the women also have many fatal flaws. At 85 I know of a few of them. Life is a battle from pretty early on. I learned from WL, although I don't think he came up with it, that Joshua's fight with the Amelekites was to go on forever and that fight was our flesh. The Gays just have an extra battle to fight. But you know we all don't fight exactly the same battles. Lisbon |
|
07-04-2015, 11:15 AM | #993 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
Annalee Newitz is the author of the book, Scatter, Adapt and Remember: How Humans Will Survive a Mass Extinction. Since we're over populating the earth, homosexual marriage may actually contribute to the solution.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
07-04-2015, 07:50 PM | #994 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Fundamentalism
SO if I have convictions your going to make that fundamentalism? Isnt it just clear some things are just true and somethings false isn't it as simple as that & wouldn't that be a child's response?
|
07-05-2015, 09:49 AM | #995 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,223
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Welcome to Alt. Views. There isn't a consensus about what fundamentalism means on this thread. So if you want to know what a member means by the term, you may wish to address your question to that person. What does the term means to you? I'm also interested in reading what things appear to be "just true" to you.
__________________
Ken Gemmer- Church in Detroit, Church in Fort Lauderdale, Church in Miami 1973-86 |
07-05-2015, 09:51 AM | #996 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
07-05-2015, 12:48 PM | #997 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
07-06-2015, 06:20 AM | #998 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Well I think I've made it plain out here that I gave up fundamentalism, like you gave up Catholicism.
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
07-06-2015, 06:48 AM | #999 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,654
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
When I gave up Catholicism, I dumped man-made traditions, the same kinds of things that the Lord Jesus faced in His ministry on earth with the Jewish traditions. What I did not give up was the things of God. In other words, I dumped everything regarding the worship of Mary, but kept everything related to the Son of God. I dumped all the church laws and commandments, but still held on to the word of God. God's word, primarily the New Testament, became the definitive test for everything.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
07-06-2015, 08:53 AM | #1000 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,064
|
Re: Fundamentalism
Quote:
There are Christians in the past claiming to hold to scripture that the RCC stamped out. Have you gone back to them?
__________________
Cults: My brain will always be there for you. Thinking. So you don't have to. There's a serpent in every paradise. |
|
|
|