Two Lees and the Council of Jerusalem

[YP0534]

Originally Posted by OBW

And yes, this definitely allowed for diversity of expression rather than uniformity. So, as I said before, Lee got it entirely wrong.

In the later case.

I think he was at least close during the Life-Study messages.
To me, that's a very interesting facet of all of this.

There really isn't a monolithic "LEE" on some issues, at least.

Tomes' proposed "Polemic Lee"/"Expositor Lee" split should be seriously considered in light of all of Lee's writings and the practical history among them.

If Lee could turn the "leprosy in the house" into a mandate to ferret out the rebellion in the late 80s, what other messages, or topics, in the past were slanted with his instant polemic intention?

That's by no means my life's work, but it is something I consider on a regular basis as I encounter these issues. I would really like to be able to parse his bias in an intelligible and concise fashion because it would make the body of his work much more useful to me. We've all got filters and articulating Lee's more succinctly I think would be of benefit to all of his past, present and future students.