"The Multiple Invisibilities of Witness Lee"

[OBW]

There is nothing transparent about this article. It is the standard opaque garbage that is typically generated by the LRC. It looks like this person is a loyal follower of Lee attempting to get positive material published about Lee in a seminary by doing doctoral studies there and doing his own publishing.

The whole bit of the terminology of "transparent," "invisible," and "erasures" are nothing but misdirection and filler.

There is nothing transparent about Lee.

He is never invisible to the LRC except when trying to say that they don't simply follow his every word without serious scrutiny.

And Lee is never erased — except when they publish his spoken word into books so that they can point to what he is documented as saying. This allows them to claim that he never said what he said because it is not in the book. But it is always on the tape of the speaking that became the book. The official copies may be erased or hidden, but there are people who still have them to this very day. And many others who agree that he said what is now claimed that he did not say.

Now if he were to retitle his article to "the Sleight of Hand and Cunning Craftiness of Witness Lee" I would have cause to agree.