Apologies

[Indiana]

I had contacted Jane and John a few years ago but we couldn’t make good progress. Now I see the problem on my side better, and I understand the vehemence several had toward me. This is much different than receiving vague messages; John and Jane clearly state the case, because they actually have one. And, they win. I agree with their judgment.

http://www.makingstraightthewayofthe...ndJane2016.pdf

[Betsy]

Originally Posted by Indiana

I had contacted Jane and John a few years ago but we couldn’t make good progress. Now I see the problem on my side better, and I understand the vehemence several had toward me. This is much different than receiving vague messages; John and Jane clearly state the case, because they actually have one. And, they win. I agree with their judgment.

http://www.makingstraightthewayofthe...ndJane2016.pdf

Indiana -- how considerate of you! Hopefully this will help the Andersons feel better. Sadly I've learned that those who should apologize rarely do.

For some reason this made me think of 1 Cor 13: 4 Love suffers long and is kind; love does not envy; love does not parade itself, is not puffed up; 5 does not behave rudely, does not seek its own, is not provoked, thinks no evil; 6 does not rejoice in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth; 7 bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.

[John]

A number of weeks ago, when I was trying to log in to the forum so that I could post on the “Good vs. Lee’s Trees” thread, after being away for years, the passwords I tried didn’t work. During the password reset process, I noticed a private message (PM) from Indiana dated in 2016 that was entitled, “Apology,” and it was not marked as having been read by me. In the PM, Indiana asked me a question. I am answering that question now in the attached PDF.