Leaders of the Lord's Recovery

[Freedom]

Originally Posted by Terry

This prior Bellevue elder was so sure of himself. So sure of Witness Lee and so sure of the Blended brothers. The problem is when one believes you cannot be wrong, you may very well be deceived. The deception is due in part having lost all humility.

These were my thoughts exactly. The letter implies that Steve is too sure of himself. But that's exactly what this Bellevue elder is guilty of, not Steve. With respect to how LCers view Lee, there is only one view that they hold, that being "even when he's wrong, he's right."

[TLFisher]

Originally Posted by Freedom

These were my thoughts exactly. The letter implies that Steve is too sure of himself. But that's exactly what this Bellevue elder is guilty of, not Steve. With respect to how LCers view Lee, there is only one view that they hold, that being "even when he's wrong, he's right."

Like Witness Lee and maybe some other coworkers, this prior Bellevue elder (last I knew was in Sao Paulo), was equally strong and absolute in his speaking. So certain was his speaking in the letter that Steve Isitt was the one in error. There is not the consideration "what if"? What if the blendeds are the ones in error? What if the elder writing the letter had been fed half-truths and misrepresentations?
This is what I believe has happened to many a local church elder. They have been deceived and in turn lead many a local church into deception. Not once has there been any indication there's another possibility to consider. Completely closed. To consider anything different than the reality LSM presents would indicate brothers who are not quite "absolute for the ministry" as claiming to be.