The Church with No Name?

[Nell]

Originally Posted by zeek

The churches had to formally take names in order to receive the legal status of non-profit income tax organizations didn't they?

Yes. You do. This was always the case from day one. We had yearly business meetings, the charter was read, etc. We were doing business as "The Church in ...." on file with the Secretary of State.

Still, you are not required to have a sign out front. It's a choice. There was derisive criticism of poor degraded Christianity for having a sign out front.

I believe claiming to be THE church is divisive. Why not just let the Lord call you the church, if indeed you are! Wait! He did! When 2-3 are gathered in His name. Of course, the LC doesn't gather in Jesus' name. It's about Witness Lee. So they don't qualify on that one either.

Nell

[Nell]

Please delete.

[zeek]

Originally Posted by Nell

Yes. You do. This was always the case from day one. We had yearly business meetings, the charter was read, etc. We were doing business as "The Church in ...." on file with the Secretary of State.

Still, you are not required to have a sign out front. It's a choice. There was derisive criticism of poor degraded Christianity for having a sign out front.

I believe claiming to be THE church is divisive. Why not just let the Lord call you the church, if indeed you are! Wait! He did! When 2-3 are gathered in His name. Of course, the LC doesn't gather in Jesus' name. It's about Witness Lee. So they don't qualify on that one either.

Nell

Yes, well in the scheme of things it is, to me, one more step down from the ideal. One small step for man, one giant step down for a dream of God. The Local Church takes it's place beside the other denominations with the dream of going back to the original New Testament model of what a church is supposed to be. It makes me a little sad. Is that what you are getting at?

[Nell]

Originally Posted by zeek

Yes, well in the scheme of things it is, to me, one more step down from the ideal. One small step for man, one giant step down for a dream of God. The Local Church takes it's place beside the other denominations with the dream of going back to the original New Testament model of what a church is supposed to be. It makes me a little sad. Is that what you are getting at?

For me, it's about the hypocrisy. It's so blatant.

Also for me, the more I know, the less certain I am that fallen man can get very little related to the church "right". I think there is waaaaay too much "church talk"; waaaaay much "leaning on our own understanding".

There's too much "church talk" and not enough reliance on a simple walk with God. Not enough reading the Bible and obedience to its commands. Not enough "when we sin, repent." Not enough "when someone sins against us, go to the brother". When God speaks, we listen and obey. If He tells us to go somewhere and meet with certain Christians---GO! If He tells us to share the gospel with someone, we speak.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results. People think "this is it" only to spawn yet another denomination. This is what I see among Christians. Trying to "get it right"; trying to figure out "the church". Didn't Jesus say "I will build my church"? Why not get out of the way and let him? Didn't Jesus say "Follow Me"? What a great idea? He builds his church and we follow him.

The problem with thinking you've figured out "the church" is...you haven't. It's not possible. The best you can do is get to know Him, obey Him, and trust Him to lead you in the path you should go. When you mess up, talk it over with Him.

Forget the "church talk". If Jesus is your best friend, I think you'll be OK.

Nell

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by Nell

For me, it's about the hypocrisy. It's so blatant.

Also for me, the more I know, the less certain I am that fallen man can get very little related to the church "right". I think there is waaaaay too much emphasis on "the church". Waaaaay much "leaning on our own understanding".

There's too much "church talk" and not enough reliance on a simple walk with God. Not enough reading the Bible and obedience to its commands. Not enough "when we sin, repent." Not enough "when someone sins against us, go to the brother". When God speaks, we listen and obey. If He tells us to go somewhere and meet with certain Christians---GO! If He tells us to share the gospel with someone, we speak.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results. This is what I see among Christians. Trying to "get it right"; trying to figure out "the church". Didn't Jesus say "I will build my church"? Why not get out of the way and let him? Didn't Jesus say "Follow Me"? What a great idea? He builds his church and we follow him.

The problem with thinking you've figured out "the church" is...you haven't. It's not possible. The best you can do is get to know Him, obey Him, and trust Him to lead you in the path you should go. When you mess up, talk it over with Him.

Forget the "church talk". If Jesus is your best friend, I think you'll be OK.

Nell

Someone said, "aim for Christ," and you will get both Christ and His church. Aim for the church, and you get neither.

[Nell]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Someone said, "aim for Christ," and you will get both Christ and His church. Aim for the church, and you get neither.

The first person I heard say this was Benson Phillips. He was apparently not listening to himself.

Nell

[Cal]

I believe this was a rephrase of C.S. Lewis' quote: "Aim at Heaven and you will get Earth thrown in: aim at Earth and you will get neither."

[awareness]

Originally Posted by Nell

The problem with thinking you've figured out "the church" is...you haven't.

But Nell, doesn't this idea -- Recovery, Restoration, whatever name -- come from the belief that the RCC corrupted the early Acts church, and that God's blessing, not to mention the return of the Bridegroom, will result if we can only get it back to its pre-corrupted state?

It's a funny idea, when you step back and take a look at it ... very reverse-engineering ... very Cargo Cultic.

And it is exclusive and divisive. It's a, we're the true bride and all y'all, all the rest in Christendom, are not.

That's why the trouble with taking a name. They didn't want to identify with the whores that corrupted the early Acts church. They were/are THE LORD'S RECOVERY. Everybody else is not.

But putting a sign up, now that betrays that they aren't identified with all the rest. I can't believe they are actually doing it. I remember, it was such a source of pride that we had no name.

To me, and I'm not surprised, the sign makes them a laughingstock.

And you are right, all failures of building the church boils down to what causes the failure of all human systems: human nature, even of the "regenerated ones."

That "old man" is like a cartoon character. Drop a piano on him, and flatten him flat as a flitter, and he springs back up, fine as new.

[OBW]

Originally Posted by awareness

That's why the trouble with taking a name. They didn't want to identify with the whores that corrupted the early Acts church. They were/are THE LORD'S RECOVERY. Everybody else is not.

As I have said on occasion, I understand and sort of like the cargo cult idea. But what we really have is not quite that. They claim they found the shell of one of the original planes. But it turns out that it was fabricated out of plastic like something from Disneyland. With a rope around it so that you can't touch it and see that it is not really a plane.

They created the back story that would live on as the "recovered" story.

Yes, we can say that the RCC is partly responsible for he problems in the church today (along with everyone else). And they may qualify as one of the more problematic of the church "types" in the seven letters in Revelation. But the rest of us are somewhere in there and those other types each require that the people "overcome" (whatever that actually means — not dissing it, but asking).

The "name" problem is part of the fictional back-story. The Legend. It is put out there as a bugaboo to shout at. If you shout loud enough, maybe God will hear you. (Maybe like those prophets of Baal trying to bring down fire from heaven.)

But eventually you get too much flack about being so hard to find. So you give in and declare that your name is a non-name and put out your sign. Parse through the words and declare it to be non-descript enough to pass muster. BTW. Were there any signs in front of the LRC meeting halls when Lee was still alive?

[rayliotta]

Originally Posted by OBW

Were there any signs in front of the LRC meeting halls when Lee was still alive?

Interesting question. To the best of my memory, our locality got a sign within a few years after Witness Lee passed away.

Even as a young person, I was old enough to remember that signs were bad, just like "denominations" were bad, and calling a "meeting hall" a "church" was bad. And saying "church of [name of city]" was bad -- it had to be "church in [name of city]" -- lest we forget that we are in, not of, the world. Interesting that the church without a name has to have its non-name pronounced just so.

Even as a young person, I was surprised that we were getting a sign.

[bearbear]

Originally Posted by awareness

But Nell, doesn't this idea -- Recovery, Restoration, whatever name -- come from the belief that the RCC corrupted the early Acts church, and that God's blessing, not to mention the return of the Bridegroom, will result if we can only get it back to its pre-corrupted state?

Yet for all the LCs attempts to criticize the RCC and use it as an example of what not to do, it pretty much ended up like another mini-version of the RCC within Protestantism, a universal catholic church with Anaheim as it's Vatican city, where LSM factory blending operations take place, in which blended brothers are cloned for each age as their Pope(s) and universal publications such as HWMR are minted for all LC laity to consume.

So the LCs could be an example for how when you curse something, those curses may end up backfiring onto yourself in ways that are even more ridiculous.

Jesus told us to bless those who curse us. Should we then bless the LCs? After all, they are in the business of cursing former members. Maybe ex-LCers suffer because we are hung up on criticizing the LC system when God wants us to move on so we can heal. Maybe we're cursing ourselves by cursing the LCs as they cursed the RCC and everyone else. Perhaps the wake of destruction left by Witness Lee can be described as a huge cyclical curse-fest that can only be broken when the hurt people decide to finally break the cycle by blessing.

If that's true, I'm sorry for all the fault finding of Witness Lee I've done in recent posts. What use is it to dwell on the glaring faults of a man who has long died? Perhaps God has much in store for us if we can move on.

May God bless those in the LCs so that they can find the freedom promised in Christ.

1 Peter 3:9
Don't repay evil for evil. Don't retaliate with insults when people insult you. Instead, pay them back with a blessing. That is what God has called you to do, and he will bless you for it.

[OBW]

Originally Posted by bearbear

Jesus told us to bless those who curse us. Should we then bless the LCs? After all, they are in the business of cursing former members. Maybe ex-LCers suffer because we are hung up on criticizing the LC system when God wants us to move on so we can heal. Maybe we're cursing ourselves by cursing the LCs as they cursed the RCC and everyone else. Perhaps the wake of destruction left by Witness Lee can be described as a huge cyclical curse-fest that can only be broken when the hurt people decide to finally break the cycle by blessing.

If that's true, I'm sorry for all the fault finding of Witness Lee I've done in recent posts. What use is it to dwell on the glaring faults of a man who has long died? Perhaps God has much in store for us if we can move on.

May God bless those in the LCs so that they can find the freedom promised in Christ.

1 Peter 3:9
Don't repay evil for evil. Don't retaliate with insults when people insult you. Instead, pay them back with a blessing. That is what God has called you to do, and he will bless you for it.

But it was Paul who said there should be disputes over the truth so that what is actually true may be found.

And unfortunately, avoiding the actual face-to-face hashing out of the disagreements is what gave us the fragmented situation we have today. It is rather benign to have one church whose style of "worship" is one way while another's is different. But just "agreeing to disagree" on a lot of the things that separate us is not what was intended.

The purpose of the nailing of the theses on the door was to announce an opportunity for people among a single community of believers to face differences of opinion and see where the discussion would lead. It was the "we have already decided and will not consider" attitude of the hierarchy of the church that divided us then and continues to divide us now.

There are two parts to reconciliation. One would be ideal but not likely. The other is imperative. The first is that we somehow actually begin to morph together but continue to have internal doctrinal differences that we slowly hash through, but in the meantime live with the unsettled nature of things. The other is to remain in siloes, but have an honest unity with our brothers and sisters with whom we do not entirely agree. There should be a core of belief that is common among us that we all identify with. From one extreme to the other. (That does not include those who disagree on the deity of Christ.)

This problem has been with us since the early days of the church. The Council of Nicaea was important in bringing together some divergent thoughts. But it was also part of the start of creating bright lines over every little thing and tossing people out for straying just a little. We now refer to those early writers as part of our "fathers" in theology. But we have little concerning the variants of the day because rather than hashing it out, they silenced those who did not support the official position. Everything was fully decided. And often by threat of harm.

So I would agree that cursing the LRC is a problem. But having open discussions of the issues that are seen as plaguing the group are part of the process of arriving at the truth. Meantime, they are set that their internal decisions, void of vetting against the thoughts of others, are not only the ones they will stick to, but the ones that everyone should follow or be reprobate.

We should bless the people. But we should be honest concerning discussion of the disagreements on what is true and righteous.

[Nell]

Acts 17:10 And the brethren immediately sent away Paul and Silas by night unto Berea: who coming thither went into the synagogue of the Jews.
11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.
12 Therefore many of them believed; also of honourable women which were Greeks, and of men, not a few.

Yes! Search the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. Another LC issue ... receive the word we're cranking out, but don't ask questions.

My point will always be...don't lean unto your own understanding. Balance your searching of the scriptures with your personal and intimate walk with Jesus. All the "church talk", as has been noted, is just that...talk. it's man's interpretation of scriptures...or, man's interpretation of another man's interpretation of another man's interpretation of scriptures! Search the scripture for yourself. Even Lee gets to interpret the scriptures. He also has the right to be wrong.

Lee was another John the Baptist. Pointing to himself instead of the one who was coming. Lee became a rival to Jesus just as John did. John the Baptist was removed from the scene. No one talks about John the Baptist anymore, yet Lee still has a following. Lee's "ministry" should have ended when he died. We don't need Lee's "ministry". We just need to continue to search the scriptures FOR OURSELVES. Have our own personal walk with Jesus. Credit the interpretation of others only as that...their interpretation.

Following fallen men can only lead to following their fallen beliefs and teachings and...hypocrisy.

Nell

[zeek]

bearbear

So the LCs could be an example for how when you curse something, those curses may end up backfiring onto yourself in ways that are even more ridiculous.

Could be. Then again maybe not. How would you measure whether that is occurring? If you were able to show that LCs were having greater than a normal statistical distribution of misfortune, how would you go about ruling out other possible causes?

Jesus told us to bless those who curse us. Should we then bless the LCs? After all, they are in the business of cursing former members. Maybe ex-LCers suffer because we are hung up on criticizing the LC system when God wants us to move on so we can heal. Maybe we're cursing ourselves by cursing the LCs as they cursed the RCC and everyone else. Perhaps the wake of destruction left by Witness Lee can be described as a huge cyclical curse-fest that can only be broken when the hurt people decide to finally break the cycle by blessing.

I think this supposition is seriously unfounded, bearbear. Who is cursing anyone here? I haven't seen it. Can you cite three examples? What do you mean by "hung up?" Some of us were in the Local Churches for a decade or more. Our experience there effected us socially, psychologically and spiritually. We may have perhaps already "moved on" without reflecting about the possible effects that the LC had on us. This is a place where we can talk about our experience with others who are interested because they too have "been through it.'

Discussing what we experienced with others may have a therapeutic effect. It may aid a person in re-evaluating their beliefs and values so that they can go on with their lives in a positive way. We may be in a position to offer mutual reciprocal support to each other. I can testify that I have witnessed that kind of healing and support going on between the members here including myself.

If that's true, I'm sorry for all the fault finding of Witness Lee I've done in recent posts. What use is it to dwell on the glaring faults of a man who has long died? Perhaps God has much in store for us if we can move on.

What use? Witness lee's teachings and practices are still being followed religiously by thousands of people. If those teachings and practices are false or harmful and we do not address those problems who will?

May God bless those in the LCs so that they can find the freedom promised in Christ.

Amen.

1 Peter 3:9
Don't repay evil for evil. Don't retaliate with insults when people insult you. Instead, pay them back with a blessing. That is what God has called you to do, and he will bless you for it.

Amen.

I don't think that this website was designed to be a place for insulting anyone. I try to avoid that. If you ever see me doing that, please let me know

[rayliotta]

Originally Posted by zeek

...I think this supposition is seriously unfounded, bearbear. Who is cursing anyone here? I haven't seen it. Can you cite three examples? What do you mean by "hung up?" Some of us were in the Local Churches for a decade or more. Our experience there effected us socially, psychologically and spiritually. We may have perhaps already "moved on" without reflecting about the possible effects that the LC had on us. This is a place where we can talk about our experience with others who are interested because they too have "been through it.'...

I could be wrong...but I thought I detected a bit of wistfulness in bearbear's post.

In any event...I'm pretty sure there are folks in the Recovery who view any candid acknowledgment of anything negative from the Recovery's history...or deceitful speaking or cover-ups within the Recovery...as exposing Noah's nakedness...and therefore...a curse...

It's spelled --

-C-
-U-
-R-
-S-
-E-

"curse"

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by bearbear

Yet for all the LCs attempts to criticize the RCC and use it as an example of what not to do, it pretty much ended up like another mini-version of the RCC within Protestantism, a universal catholic church with Anaheim as it's Vatican city, where LSM factory blending operations take place, in which blended brothers are cloned for each age as their Pope(s) and universal publications such as HWMR are minted for all LC laity to consume.

So the LCs could be an example for how when you curse something, those curses may end up backfiring onto yourself in ways that are even more ridiculous.

Jesus told us to bless those who curse us. Should we then bless the LCs? After all, they are in the business of cursing former members. Maybe ex-LCers suffer because we are hung up on criticizing the LC system when God wants us to move on so we can heal. Maybe we're cursing ourselves by cursing the LCs as they cursed the RCC and everyone else. Perhaps the wake of destruction left by Witness Lee can be described as a huge cyclical curse-fest that can only be broken when the hurt people decide to finally break the cycle by blessing.

If that's true, I'm sorry for all the fault finding of Witness Lee I've done in recent posts. What use is it to dwell on the glaring faults of a man who has long died? Perhaps God has much in store for us if we can move on.

May God bless those in the LCs so that they can find the freedom promised in Christ.

1 Peter 3:9
Don't repay evil for evil. Don't retaliate with insults when people insult you. Instead, pay them back with a blessing. That is what God has called you to do, and he will bless you for it.

Witness Lee taught his followers to judge people and their hearts, as if he knew what was in the hearts of man. All those outside the Recovery were judged as hopelessly divided and more. Leaders within the Recovery, and there is a long list here spanning decades, were judged for being "ambitious." Vague accusations of conspiracy and rebellion were thrown in.

There is a difference between judging others and properly recording history and warning the church. The NT is filled with warnings from the OT failures. They should not be considered as "judging."

I admit that some times forum posts cross the line into the area of judging. One distinguishing point of judging is known here as "ad hominems." Instead of pointing out one's failure, it attacks the person. It is similar to raising a child. A proper parent should never tell a child, "you are evil" or "you are stupid." That is destructive judgmentalism. A proper parent instead addresses the behavior of the child, while constantly extolling the child's inherent worth.

[Nell]

Originally Posted by bearbear

...
Jesus told us to bless those who curse us. Should we then bless the LCs? After all, they are in the business of cursing former members. Maybe ex-LCers suffer because we are hung up on criticizing the LC system when God wants us to move on so we can heal. Maybe we're cursing ourselves by cursing the LCs as they cursed the RCC and everyone else. Perhaps the wake of destruction left by Witness Lee can be described as a huge cyclical curse-fest that can only be broken when the hurt people decide to finally break the cycle by blessing.

If that's true, I'm sorry for all the fault finding of Witness Lee I've done in recent posts. What use is it to dwell on the glaring faults of a man who has long died? Perhaps God has much in store for us if we can move on.

May God bless those in the LCs so that they can find the freedom promised in Christ.

1 Peter 3:9
Don't repay evil for evil. Don't retaliate with insults when people insult you. Instead, pay them back with a blessing. That is what God has called you to do, and he will bless you for it.

Above all else, the standard is TRUTH. What is true? Faultfinding is scriptural. I'm not talking about malicious faultfinding for no good purpose. It doesn't sound like that's what you've done.

We have to be diligent to find the truth of every situation. Not only for your own sake, but for the sake of others. When I was in the Local Church of Witness Lee, I was deceived. I needed someone to speak the truth to me ... in love. I clearly remember the day I was handed a document which supposedly cleared the LC and WL from any wrongdoing. Interestingly enough, reading that doc, I had this realization: "everything they said about us is true".

That opened the door for me to eventually walk away.

One of the biggest shortcomings...weaknesses...reluctancies, etc., of Christians today is not wanting to confront sin. Their own sin and the sin of others. I was deceived but I made the choice to ignore the signs that there was trouble in the LC and with WL. I believed the LC leadership rather than searching the scriptures and finding out the truth. I ignored that voice that told me "something is wrong". This was my sin.

I also have made the choice to confront the sin of others, mainly by telling the truth. There is a price to pay for telling the truth, but it is scriptural and you have to do it. Someone told me the truth and as much as it hurt, it helped me.

I'm not saying we have to go around indiscriminately shooting our mouths off and mow people down with our version of the truth. In our walk with Him, as he speaks, in the spirit of love we just tell the truth. This is what it means to be a Christian.

You can't change another person. You can only speak when the Lord tells you to speak. The change is up to them and the Lord. They may not hear you immediately, but the truth has a ring to it! The word will not return void.

Walk with Him. Talk with Him. Obey Him. Obey his Word. Love Him and love the brothers. Sometimes this means, love them enough to tell the truth.

While I'm in sermon mode, there is an excuse we were taught that goes like this: I don't feel the Lord wants me to ...., "life will do it all", I don't feel the leading..., I'll pray about it...

Well. There are some things you don't have to pray about. There are some things you don't need to "feel" like doing. There is no verse in the Bible that says "life will do it all". That's a Witness Lee teaching which is non-scriptural.

The Bible is full of commands that we as Christians must obey. You don't have to pray about whether to obey the Bible or not. You may need to pray for the courage to obey, but scripturally, you do as you have been commanded in His book.

The end. (for now?)

Nell

[Dancing]

Originally Posted by Nell

Well. There are some things you don't have to pray about. There are some things you don't need to "feel" like doing. There is no verse in the Bible that says "life will do it all". That's a Witness Lee teaching which is non-scriptural.

The Bible is full of commands that we as Christians must obey. You don't have to pray about whether to obey the Bible or not. You may need to pray for the courage to obey, but scripturally, you do as you have been commanded in His book.

Excellent. Nobody's put that into words that I've heard yet. Some LSM folks that I'm still related to are still so engrossed in this teaching and use it as an excuse for not doing what's right time and time again to the hurt of others. So sad. But after it all I still love them. I can't force it down their throats but I can speak it in love.

Yes, there is a price to pay for telling the truth. But I'd much rather pay that price than the one of my Lord's disapproval.

Thank you, Nell.

[rayliotta]

Originally Posted by bearbear

Jesus told us to bless those who curse us. Should we then bless the LCs? After all, they are in the business of cursing former members. Maybe ex-LCers suffer because we are hung up on criticizing the LC system when God wants us to move on so we can heal. Maybe we're cursing ourselves by cursing the LCs as they cursed the RCC and everyone else. Perhaps the wake of destruction left by Witness Lee can be described as a huge cyclical curse-fest that can only be broken when the hurt people decide to finally break the cycle by blessing.

Didn't Jesus also give his followers the power to bless and the power to curse?

I think some folks like that verse just a little too much...

[Nell]

Originally Posted by rayliotta

Didn't Jesus also give his followers the power to bless and the power to curse?

I think some folks like that verse just a little too much...

Did He? What verse is that? I'm serious. I don't know of such a verse. I know God blesses and curses as he will, but I don't know that we are supposed to take that upon ourselves.

Genesis 12:3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

On the contrary...

Matthew 5:44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, ...

Luke 6:28 Bless them that curse you, ...

Romans 12:14 Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not.

James 3:8-10
8 But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.
9 Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.
10 Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be.

Nell

[Nell]

Originally Posted by awareness

But Nell, doesn't this idea -- Recovery, Restoration, whatever name -- come from the belief that the RCC corrupted the early Acts church, and that God's blessing, not to mention the return of the Bridegroom, will result if we can only get it back to its pre-corrupted state?

It's a funny idea, when you step back and take a look at it ... very reverse-engineering ... very Cargo Cultic.

And it is exclusive and divisive. It's a, we're the true bride and all y'all, all the rest in Christendom, are not.

That's why the trouble with taking a name. They didn't want to identify with the whores that corrupted the early Acts church. They were/are THE LORD'S RECOVERY. Everybody else is not.

But putting a sign up, now that betrays that they aren't identified with all the rest. I can't believe they are actually doing it. I remember, it was such a source of pride that we had no name.

To me, and I'm not surprised, the sign makes them a laughingstock.

And you are right, all failures of building the church boils down to what causes the failure of all human systems: human nature, even of the "regenerated ones."

That "old man" is like a cartoon character. Drop a piano on him, and flatten him flat as a flitter, and he springs back up, fine as new.

In the current pop culture, it's the equivalent to the expression "If it's on the Internet, it must be true."

If Witness Lee said it, it must be true.

If I put up a sign with a name on it, and tell you I don't take a name, then I don't take a name. So shut up and stop questioning me. Do as I say, not as I do. And I am not a hypocrite.

Nell

[OBW]

Originally Posted by Nell

Still, you are not required to have a sign out front. It's a choice. There was derisive criticism of poor degraded Christianity for having a sign out front.

Nell,

I think I understand your entire meaning based on all the posts. But this one part brings up something that I just want to make sure about.

You aren't suggesting that taking down the sign at the local meeting halls makes any actual difference are you?

Pretty sure I know the answer.

[Nell]

Originally Posted by OBW

Nell,

I think I understand your entire meaning based on all the posts. But this one part brings up something that I just want to make sure about.

You aren't suggesting that taking down the sign at the local meeting halls makes any actual difference are you?

Pretty sure I know the answer.

No. Short of shutting the place down, not much will make a difference. Lord shine your light.

Nell

[OBW]

Originally Posted by Nell

No. Short of shutting the place down, not much will make a difference. Lord shine your light.

Nell

As I thought. And agree.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by OBW

Nell,

I think I understand your entire meaning based on all the posts. But this one part brings up something that I just want to make sure about.

You aren't suggesting that taking down the sign at the local meeting halls makes any actual difference are you?

Pretty sure I know the answer.

We took a lot of heat for not having a sign out front, as if we were being deceptive. Looking back, the biggest thing we had to hide was our relationship with Lee and LSM.

[TLFisher]

Originally Posted by Nell

I believe claiming to be THE church is divisive. Why not just let the Lord call you the church, if indeed you are! Wait! He did! When 2-3 are gathered in His name. Of course, the LC doesn't gather in Jesus' name. It's about Witness Lee. So they don't qualify on that one either.

Very true Nell. When you claim to be something at the exclusion of others, it is division. Why not call it what it is.
Present time fellowship in the LC is based on receiving a specific Christian publisher. If you don't receive publications of this Christian publisher, there cannot be fellowship.
They may not teach it, but the practice is making their receiving narrower than God's receiving, Reference to Romans 15:7.