"Heavenly Language"

[alwayslearning]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Titus Chu in Cleveland really did not promote this kind of thing, in fact it was regularly exposed as foolishness, especially after WL passed. Titus, in fact, much preferred creative and inspirational thoughts about the Bible and our Christian walk rather than mere vocabularies.

He would regularly walk the fine line by never saying anything against WL, who was the source of this "Heavenly Language," yet continually berate the Blendeds for latching on to it and promoting it.

Titus Chu was a master at being 2 faced when it came to Witness Lee. His way of handling it probably confused a lot of people. IMHO to be "against" the Anaheim Politburo is to be against Witness Lee because in fact they pride themselves in following him in word and deed and do it quite well - including ousting Titus Chu for flimsy reasons with no biblical basis. They admitted that they asked each other WWWLD and they did it to Titus.

But anyway I'm glad to hear he is not a proponent of the "Heavenly Language" theory! I was mostly thinking of him not liking the use of the word "pastor" and other such language violations.

(BTW how much do you think Titus' clinging to Witness Lee, ground of locality, certain music styles, etc. is to pander to a certain constituency within the LCs in the GLA who are supportive of him? I.e. would he be less LCish if his most supportive constituency was as well?)