|
10-05-2024, 09:52 AM | #1 | |
MEMBER
Join Date: Sep 2024
Posts: 41
|
Re: Up from Babylon
Quote:
may I pick up this one, even though this great debate is older? Because the last sentence captures what I feel myself. There can be no stable “ground of oneness” as long as our human oneness needs it’s own ground. Would you agree? Indiana may be mistaken above in attributing the term to Watchman Nee, it's certainly not in „Rethinking our Work“ from 1937. It's probably more of a typical case where Lee, who uses the term, goes beyond Nee and things start to loose balance. (I personally believe that Nee valued Lee less for his theological talent than for his organizational one). However, I do wonder: if there is a „proper gound“, which is Christ, if the proper ground is the gospel, the gospel of reconciliation and of restoration of our unity with God - is it then possible that we have no unity and still stand on proper ground?? Maybe self-deception is the problem? I also agree with Cal’s: „Trying to use locality to enforce oneness is like trying to use a rooster to make the sun rise.“ And that any group with the attitude “we have the right stand, you don't” is not solving the problem of lack of unity, but rather makes it worse. But how about we say, “As long as we live apart from each other, we ALL miss the right stand.” In Watchman Nee’s very last message from 1951 we find thoughts along these lines. And I quote him from 1934: „Due to the outward ruinous appearance of the Church today, however, the division among God’s people is so serious that no group of believers — including ourselves — can freely call itself the local assembly.” Last edited by PeterG; 10-05-2024 at 07:39 PM. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|