08-19-2019, 12:54 PM
|
#16
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,693
|
Re: One Publication
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
Yes, I agree, it is better. So what would be some fair guidelines. If you tried to fellowship and they refuse to hear you, at what point do you decide that they are the ones who are not willing to fellowship in a coordinated fashion?
One brother made phone calls, sent letters, sent them registered mail, etc. Nothing. So who is the one that is not willing to practice being governed by the cross?
We are not talking about petty grievances. We are talking about slandering brothers from the pulpit, libel, excommunicating saints, putting lascivious men in positions of authority in the ministry, etc.
When a leading elder, Ed Marks, refuses to "deal with" questions about his signature on a letter of apology to Phillip Lee 20 years later, who is the one who is refusing to fellowship in a coordinated fashion in submission to the cross of Christ?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake
Thanks for your question ZNP. I'll give this some prayerful consideration before responding. Thanks for your patience.
Drake
|
Bringing this forward for Drake to reply to ZNP, as he promised.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!.
Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point!
|
|
|