Kaung and Lee Lines in America - A History

Indiana · 04-18-2018, 01:13 PM

http://lordsrecovery.us/LeeKaungLinesinAmerica.pdf

Having spent 30 years in the local churches under the ministry of Witness Lee and the last three years in fellowship with Stephen Kaung-associated assemblies, I have found the fellowship in both groups to be so similar and their hearts much the same for carrying out God’s eternal purpose in building up the one Body of Christ.

Where I live, there is a group that calls themselves the church in Seattle, (where I used to meet); and another group here which calls themselves Seattle Christian Assembly, (where I now meet). They have no difference in their basic statement of the faith regarding what is essential to believers in “the fellowship”. And, their basic understanding, doctrinally, of the church and of keeping the oneness of the Body of Christ is essentially the same. Yet, they cannot be one for a testimony in Seattle.

It is the same in New York where Stephen Kaung was asked to address New York’s past and his relationship with Witness Lee. He noted that there was one point about the church ground that he could not conscientiously accept and that Witness Lee had become adamant about. That separating factor managed to survive till today.

Note: Corrections welcome. I hope this can be a vitriol-free thread. I do like my basic positioning and perspective for writing and bringing attention to the relevant history covered.

04-18-2018, 01:13 PM	#1
Indiana Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 713	Kaung and Lee Lines in America - A History http://lordsrecovery.us/LeeKaungLinesinAmerica.pdf Having spent 30 years in the local churches under the ministry of Witness Lee and the last three years in fellowship with Stephen Kaung-associated assemblies, I have found the fellowship in both groups to be so similar and their hearts much the same for carrying out God’s eternal purpose in building up the one Body of Christ. Where I live, there is a group that calls themselves the church in Seattle, (where I used to meet); and another group here which calls themselves Seattle Christian Assembly, (where I now meet). They have no difference in their basic statement of the faith regarding what is essential to believers in “the fellowship”. And, their basic understanding, doctrinally, of the church and of keeping the oneness of the Body of Christ is essentially the same. Yet, they cannot be one for a testimony in Seattle. It is the same in New York where Stephen Kaung was asked to address New York’s past and his relationship with Witness Lee. He noted that there was one point about the church ground that he could not conscientiously accept and that Witness Lee had become adamant about. That separating factor managed to survive till today. Note: Corrections welcome. I hope this can be a vitriol-free thread. I do like my basic positioning and perspective for writing and bringing attention to the relevant history covered.