Local Church Discussions  

Go Back   Local Church Discussions > Orthopraxy - Christian Practice

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-16-2008, 12:57 PM   #10
Peter Debelak
I Have Finished My Course
 
Peter Debelak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Avon, OH
Posts: 303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KSA View Post
The authority in the church is not in the office. It is in the godly character and the anointing of a minister. When he is appointed for the office, it is just a recognition of the spiritual authority that he already posseses. If he has fallen from the Lord, then, of course, he loses his spiritual authority. But he should be removed by proper means. For example, the Word says that an accusation against an elder should be confirmed by two or three witnesses.
Here is my first thought in response:

If a believer's spiritual authority pre-exists holding an official "office," then why the need to appoint to an "office"? If the believers recognize the spiritual authority as such, why the need to implement a formal structural arrangement? I cannot see the value of "appointing to an office" except in historical context or situationally. It is self-contradictory otherwise, no?
__________________
I Have Finished My Course
Peter Debelak is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:54 PM.


3.8.9