![]() |
|
Apologetic discussions Apologetic Discussions Regarding the Teachings of Watchman Nee and Witness Lee |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW area
Posts: 4,384
|
![]()
Harold,
You didn't read the rest of my post. I effectively dumped inerrancy as a useful term. Read zeek's post (the one before yours). A different take on it than mine, but insightful. The Bible is a collection of narratives and writings concerning God covering some centuries of time. It is lousy as a detailed history or as a science text. But it reveals God. But it does not do that very well unless the Spirit enlightens it. Then and only then can the term "inerrant" even begin to be discussed.
__________________
Mike I think . . . . I think I am . . . . therefore I am, I think — Edge OR . . . . You may be right, I may be crazy — Joel |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|