Quote:
Originally Posted by UntoHim
In what little I have heard from Titus, I think his view of Witness Lee falls somewhere between the two (as does the BB's I think). Furthermore, the root of the disagreements between Chu and BB have little to nothing to do with their over-all view of Lee. The BBs simply want Chu to "do Lee" their way and present Lee their way....Titus has always chosen to do Lee and present Lee in his own way. I don't believe that they disagree on the end, just the means to that end. In some respects all I see from Titus Chu is a "re-packaging" of Lee's ministry with a little bit of personal spin to make it his own. This apparently infuriates the BBs and other non GLAers...why I don't know because Chu is one of the most close imitators of Witness Lee I have ever seen...and I have seen a lot.
|
The BB/CB disagreements over how each side plans to "
do-Lee," was simply a "smokescreen" for a power struggle. The BB's used the One Pub Bull to force TC and the GLA into subjection. This is part of what
Igzy means by
idolatry by submission. I never saw or heard TC venerate WL, any more than exhortations to "stay close" to his ministry as an older servant of the Lord. TC actively received from the ministry of WL from 1953-1997, so it's hard to see any critic not saying that, "
Titus Chu is a "re-packaging" of Lee's ministry with a little bit of personal spin to make it his own." Pretty harsh for one who admits to
"what little I have heard from Titus."
UntoHim, you parsed my post long and hard, yet I still don't see any support for the notion that TC and the GLA are all idolaters
guilty by association.