|
Introductions and Testimonies Please tell everybody something about yourself. Tell us a little. Tell us a lot. Its up to you! |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
02-10-2020, 04:41 AM | #1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
I left after nearly 8 yrs in the LC. I was saved there and enjoyed the fellowship with the saints. But the exclusiveness of the LC caused me to be a minion,and I think it's time to say goodbye, for a greater good. Looking back I was living in a delusion. I was a proud Christian because we were taught we are the recovery, commissioned by the Lord, unlike rest of the group. When I met with Christians who aren't from the LC, I don't expect to have any fellowship with them, because they are a 'denomination'. I never read books from the leaders of Christianity, I only read material given by LSM, although many times I found the Life Study by Lee isn't helpful. When I say the church and the ministry, I never had a feeling of including all other churches which aren't of the LC, or I say the ministry I can only thought of LSM. That's the effect of the brainwashing that has been done to my head. Basically I'm locked in a tiny, restricted area.
When I read the church history from the non LSM perspective I'm so happy to quit. Because being in the LC is like living in North Korea, it's a system of error, it just should not be that way, it doesn't make sense, it feels like the Mormon system or JW system, it is controlling, hiding history, telling the lies, a division and a delusion. Sad when I try to talk to some of them their brain can't even reason properly. They say lee isn't all perfect but can't admit LSM make mistake. They can't accept and appreciate the good work done by other Christian group, seemingly only LSM is worth praising. Even worse, they're not open to alternate interpretations, they won't read books that aren't from LSM. The fact is those books by LSM don't make many sales on amazon, yet they think those are the best books on earth that worth reading. Now I enjoy reading books by many different authors now, and learn how to interpret the bible, look at references and commentary by different authors. I no longer subscribe to the one ministry idea, the idea itself is stupid and cultish. |
02-10-2020, 02:58 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,617
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
[SIZE=""]Hallelujah!!! [/SIZE] Welcome to the forum! I have the exact same testimony as you wrote, as do so many on here - lots and lots of stories to read regarding this same experience of LC elitism on this forum. It is a sad thing. The last LC person I told that I had a great experience visiting various Christian groups around the country, had only a blank, silent stare for me. (I told him how the Lord had worked in me to enjoy the oneness of the Spirit and fellowship with any blood-bought believer . . .)
__________________
LC Berkeley 70s; LC Columbus OH 80s; An Ekklesia in Scottsdale 98-now Praise the Lord - HE'S GOT THIS! |
02-10-2020, 03:07 PM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Natal Transvaal
Posts: 5,631
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
But no! Then it was intolerable! Spiritual fornication! Jezebel! Then they start their own group, and when one points its lacks then it's a shrug and "Hey, whatever".
__________________
"Freedom is free. It's slavery that's so horribly expensive" - Colonel Templeton, ret., of the 12th Scottish Highlanders, the 'Black Fusiliers' |
|
02-10-2020, 07:43 PM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
No doubt, Nee and Lee did correctly identify some of the shortcomings in various groups. That probably would have been fine if it had stopped there. Instead they sought to use that as a means to position the LC as something superior. Not only that, but it seems that at some point, a notion developed that there is some singular path that can be traced throughout church history, with the brethren as the immediate "successor" to the LC. Everything that happened outside of the LC after that point in time was completely irrelevant as far as the LC was concerned. Lee even went on to make statements like "From 1945 to 1984, I found out that in both the English-speaking world and the Chinese-speaking world, there was not a weighty spiritual book published." Upon what basis could he even make such a claim? He could only do that because people in the LC were conditioned to believe exactly what they were told. It's ironic how things all started out with a seemingly fair assessment of church history and then became just another form of information control.
__________________
Isaiah 43:10 “You are my witnesses,” declares the Lord, “and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor will there be one after me. |
|
02-15-2020, 11:28 AM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,617
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
What a prideful trap we all fell in back then . . . hard to believe it now! I remember the elation and freedom I felt when the Lord directed me to some books by John Piper. I was so happy in spirit that someone else outside the LC could write things about being seriously in love with God and about how we were meant to be enjoying Him daily! I had been in a really deep despair because I knew I didn't want to return to the LC, but I thought there was nothing else out there of genuine spiritual value. God led me through that despair to find Piper's "Desiring God." Through that book I was led into fellowship with some ex-LCers nearby.
__________________
LC Berkeley 70s; LC Columbus OH 80s; An Ekklesia in Scottsdale 98-now Praise the Lord - HE'S GOT THIS! |
|
02-23-2020, 10:10 AM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 98
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
Yeah, Books of T. Austin Sparks are very rich in divine revealation but he was despised by Lee because of ground of oneness controversies. Lee insisted to pratice his one church per city. When Sparks seeked to correct Lee, it was Lee who turned his back from Sparks and despised him since then. |
|
02-23-2020, 02:19 PM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,693
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
This was never so evident to me as when Lee's Blendeds came into the Midwest, dividing all the true LC's, who had long stood on the "local ground" of oneness, and filed lawsuits against them to steal their meeting halls.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
02-23-2020, 05:05 PM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,617
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
__________________
LC Berkeley 70s; LC Columbus OH 80s; An Ekklesia in Scottsdale 98-now Praise the Lord - HE'S GOT THIS! |
|
02-21-2020, 09:22 AM | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 34
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
|
|
02-23-2020, 02:48 PM | #10 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Renton, Washington
Posts: 3,545
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
"I don't want to talk about it." or "God sees no iniquity in Israel" are some of the responses you might hear. To talk about LSM's mistakes is likened to "uncovering or Noah". It's just very narrow minded approach to have to shut down any logic or reason. That's been tossed out long ago.
__________________
The Church in Los Angeles 1971-1972 Phoenix 1972-1973 Albuquerque 1973-1975 Anaheim 1976-1979 San Bernardino 1979-1986 Bellevue 1993-2000 Renton 2009-2011 |
|
02-24-2020, 09:35 PM | #11 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
With some of the more recent issues, like those that they've written articles about for shepherdingwords.com, it is clear that they don't care if they defy all logic in order to defend the LC and the actions of leaders. Personally, I wonder if LC members even really believe what they are being told. I suspect that in regards to some of these issues, they know that leaders are sidestepping the issue, but they don't want to raise any fuss about it by questioning that.
__________________
Isaiah 43:10 “You are my witnesses,” declares the Lord, “and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor will there be one after me. |
|
03-10-2020, 05:51 PM | #12 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Renton, Washington
Posts: 3,545
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
Having said all this, I do believe those not believing this will either cease meeting regularly or flat out leave as ones like John Smith have.
__________________
The Church in Los Angeles 1971-1972 Phoenix 1972-1973 Albuquerque 1973-1975 Anaheim 1976-1979 San Bernardino 1979-1986 Bellevue 1993-2000 Renton 2009-2011 |
|
03-10-2020, 07:20 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
The thing that was always so striking to me was that there were clear cases of disillusionment that I saw among long time members. Most of the time these members would try to find ways to rationalize or attempt to minimize the extent of the disillusionment.
__________________
Isaiah 43:10 “You are my witnesses,” declares the Lord, “and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor will there be one after me. |
03-11-2020, 09:34 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,617
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Or just set the information aside, as the thinking is this (the LC) is God's purpose and besides, where else is there to go? I think I was sort of like that - didn't really want to hear too much as I thought it was just a distraction from the important . . . .
__________________
LC Berkeley 70s; LC Columbus OH 80s; An Ekklesia in Scottsdale 98-now Praise the Lord - HE'S GOT THIS! |
03-02-2020, 02:12 PM | #15 | |
Moderated Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 829
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
I live in San Diego; if I go to the church in SD website, and look at their History page, there is no mention of LSM. If I go to their Belief page, there is nothing about believing LSM is the unique, all important, only God sanctioned ministry. Why can’t they be honest about their history and belief? Why hide from people this great age fulfilling “truth”? I was there when the “Elders” declared in a written statement their oneness with WL/LSM (that was, of course, after an elder, J Smith declaimed he could not in good conscience follow WL/LSM and walked away from the fiasco). Why is this not part of the church in SD history? The poison to the LC is not the saints who object to WL/ LSM but LSM and the ones who perpetrate the cult scam business. Unless they can be honest and repent and return to the scripture, the LC will continue as a cult. |
|
03-02-2020, 02:24 PM | #16 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,693
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
Quote:
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
03-03-2020, 10:03 AM | #17 |
Moderated Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 829
|
Re: I left the Local Church After Reading the Real Church History
When a JW comes to my door, I point out that they are not really coming in the name of Jehovah, but are here to pedal Watchtower, at which time they go into a similar song and dance as a LC person would concerning WL/LSM.
This hiding of the symbiotic relation between the LC and WL/LSM in the history and belief pages of the church in SD website is so deceptive and reveals what is probably the true inner conflict LC members must have in regard to that whole ministry. They want to present this public image that they are happy ordinary Christians that just found a more biblical way to meet, who love the Lord and the scriptures. But they cannot bring themselves to publicly present that they are God’s move on earth under the up-to-date ministry which will close the age! If they truly believed this- shouldn’t this be their proclamation. Wouldn’t you want all the people and Christians in SD to know what they are missing? Wouldn’t they expect the Holy Spirit to witness to the seeking people the “truth” of what God is doing. Let’s face it- if you had no watchtower, you would have no JWs, if you had no Book of Mormon, you would have no LDS church, if you had no WL/LSM, the current form of LC “movement” would collapse. But how do you convince the public that WL was God’s man, and that his teachings were the word, and the LSM that he established is the only complete, true, all encompassing ministry that would complete God’s eternal purpose? How do you center your whole life, thinking, theology, rituals, programs, trainings, fellowship, acceptance of believers, relations around WL/LSM and not publicly proclaim- not shout from the roof tops what has been revealed to you in secret.? |
|
|