Quote:
Originally Posted by Igzy
I think it's interesting that Kangas chose to call Steve Isitt a "man of death." Why didn't he call him a "man of sin?" Because if he did that he'd have to specify his sin, and he can't do it because there is none.
What, exactly, is Steve doing wrong? As aron said, who said WL, or RK, or anyone else are the only ones authorized to speak? Steve is speaking as a prophet according to his conscience. He claims seem reasonable and well-thought-out. Kangas is obligated to take them seriously and address another Body member's concerns with respect.
|
If brother Ron truly feels he is a representative of God's government on earth, he should have a response for Steve Isitt. As brothers in Christ, they should be able to enter into fellowship voluntarily without using legal means to involuntarily force a response.