Quote:
Originally Posted by Evangelical
I don't know many bible believing Christians who would say this was "the church in LA". [/url]
|
I agree, but for a different reason. I think most Christ followers wouldn't even understand this question and would have difficulty trying to follow your logic (without the context of the LSM). The concept of one church per city is not biblical, nor expressed throughout Christian history as a model that the world must follow to be in good standing with our Lord. If any lurkers (kind of makes you sound scary
) are reading these posts, it may be helpful to read "The Genuine Ground of Oneness"
http://www.ministrybooks.org/alphabetical.cfm?s=G
In this publication Lee lays out his "divine revelation" from God in regards to the Local Church. When I read this I see points that I agree with regarding denominations or church practice, but that doesn't mean that Lee's ultimate conclusion is correct. Many of the same points he makes are also used to advocate for a non-denominational church. For example:
Before you came into the church life, you may have traveled from one denomination to another. You went from place to place to satisfy your own desires or taste.
This may be true for some - but this doesn't mean that Lee's ultimate conclusion is correct. "Look at them, they're not perfect, MY way is perfect." Funny enough, we talked about this specific concept in the LC too, a preference to choose one meeting hall over another to satisfy own desires or tastes. We didn't discuss it as a bad thing, but just a reality.