Quote:
Originally Posted by aron
Drake's 'argument' is to present an a priori conclusion - no variance with the LSM between the spoken word from the podium and what was eventually published. Any evidences to the contrary are dismissed out of hand.
|
Well, .... ummm... how about because no evidence has been produced?
Look, it was my practice for several decades and the end of the last century (oh my but I feel old now) to read the printed Life studies WHILE listening to the cassettes of the original speaking. I followed along with both eyes and ears simultaneously. Other than grammatical construct, removing the names of people mentioned, etc. there was never any substantive difference between what I read and what I heard.
My challenge still stands. Produce evidence showing substantive differences in teaching with what he spoke in ministry and what was published from that speaking.
Besides, Brother Lees opposers oppose him because of the things he said and published.
Drake