[UntoHim]

Originally Posted by Evangelical

it is funny when you say I have a lack of knowledge and not being able to remember one of the seminal passages in the Gospels. I was actually the one who introduced the idea of Matthew 27:46 to this thread, as far back as post #2. I quoted it again in a later post #47.

When you do quote a verse in context (a somewhat rare occasion) you seem to be confused, as if the supposed "contradictions" are something to revel in. If you don't want to be accused of a lack of knowledge then I suggest you don't make ignorant statements such as "the Father... never forsaking him" - the exact words which are recording for us in said verse. That must of been an embarrassing slip for you.

But then you made a nice recovery with this:

There is a way to reconcile both the Father leaving Christ on the cross, yet also the Father never leaving Him, if we consider Christ as both the Son of God and also the Son of Man. As the Son of Man the Father left Him, as the Son of God, the Father did not leave Him, the cross did not break the hypostatic union.

See, I knew you could do it!
-