Local Church Discussions - View Single Post

Freedom · 11-20-2015, 10:13 AM

Another double standard that comes to mind is regarding the all-to-common declarations in the LC that they don't care for doctrine or theology. If this were really true, then why in the world would they get bent out of shape when WL's teachings began to raise flags with cult-watchers?

This is one of those things that they can't have both ways. If they want to claim that they don't care for the standards needed to be considered orthodox, then there should be no concern if a cult label is applied or they are labeled as an aberrant group. Actually the very notion that "doctrines kill" should be alarming.

The frosting on the cake is that this group claiming to not care for doctrine and theology has both a litigious reputation, and they have established entities such as DCP and A&C to defend the teachings of WL. How ironic is that?

11-20-2015, 10:13 AM	#173
Freedom Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 1,636	Re: Double Standards Another double standard that comes to mind is regarding the all-to-common declarations in the LC that they don't care for doctrine or theology. If this were really true, then why in the world would they get bent out of shape when WL's teachings began to raise flags with cult-watchers? This is one of those things that they can't have both ways. If they want to claim that they don't care for the standards needed to be considered orthodox, then there should be no concern if a cult label is applied or they are labeled as an aberrant group. Actually the very notion that "doctrines kill" should be alarming. The frosting on the cake is that this group claiming to not care for doctrine and theology has both a litigious reputation, and they have established entities such as DCP and A&C to defend the teachings of WL. How ironic is that?