Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
How many times do we have to go over this?
Convicted = responsible
Indicted = implicated
Investigation = crime was committed and we want to know if he was involved. It does not imply Trump was responsible. It was predicated on evidence of a crime being committed (no one denies that), that Trump benefitted from that crime (can be debated, but certainly cannot be denied) and that there is a basis to be concerned that Trump might have been involved (meeting, his own comments).
Only an idiot would argue that the US government, realizing their election was hacked by a foreign power, should not investigate.
Mueller's report did not exonerate Trump, it merely showed he was so stupid that he could not have coordinated this. Why do I say he was stupid? He brought the entire investigation on himself. He went on public TV asking Russia to commit a crime, hack the DNC, and then publish that for his benefit. That is the definition of stupidity.
|
Obama was in power. They should have investigated him. Why did he do nothing? Why did he not inform the Trump Campaign Team about the Russian activities? Why were Democratic operatives meeting with that Russian lawyer before and after she met with the Trump Campaign officials in that infamous meeting?
ZNP, you really need to get better sources for your info. Your post indicates you are still in a 2016 mindset.
Since when does a prosecutor need to exonerate any American citizen? Are we not all INNOCENT by law until proven guilty? Why are you now demanding that Trump be EXONERATED by a prosecutor? Since when does he need to have his innocence proven?