Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
I noticed that you are mixing W. Lee’s “interpretation” with the Biblical Text of the Recovery Version. I don’t have complaints against the Biblical Text of the Recovery Version. My complaint is against many of the “outlines” and “footnotes” being wrong because they go along with W. Lee’s major errors in his teaching. Also, I don’t have a problem with W. Lee’s teaching of Soteriology or Salvation.
|
Another example of Lee's literal interpretation is this one:
Isaiah 9:6 And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father
Lee says Jesus is the Father. Many Christians deny that Jesus is the Father. Lee can't be more literal than that.