Quote:
Originally Posted by Sons to Glory!
As we've discussed numerous times on here (and I think most know my position) - I still wonder why God used the instance of eating something to start this all out. He could have used many things rathering than fruit eating . . . Jus' sayin'
|
I understand the presumption. But it is just that . . . presumption. There is no overarching theme, no built-in lens that makes it so.
To arrive at that conclusion requires that you take what is written beyond what is written. That you layer on an extension to what is there does not make it relevant to the issue. And I actually believe that if it was really so important to think in this way, the command would have been more specific. Or the confrontation afterward would have been more about something that got inside rather than how the outward would be.