Quote:
Originally Posted by Trapped
Between this thread and the previous one, there have been over 530 posts chock full of "other perspectives". I've dealt with "God is gay" and "Jesus is homosexual" perfectly respectfully and seriously, to name a few. Now you try to insinuate there was a homosexual relationship between a mother and daughter-in-law in the Bible and you try to paint it as being a positive thing rather than totally disgusting, when it's obvious you haven't taken one minute to read the passage you are quoting from?
I didn't know that shaking my head and putting my head in my hands on ONE post out of 530 is "always" getting angry.
The Bible you read seems to be "so and so turned and blinked at his friend" and you see that verse and say "AHA THEY LOOKED AT EACH OTHER, CLEARLY THEY ARE GAY LOVERS!"
That's how absurd some of the "arguments" here have been. SURELY you must recognize that about your recent Ruth/Naomi statement. Do you really still think that the Ruth/Naomi example was remotely solid or can you admit it's totally ridiculous?
Again, as usual, I'm looking for a basic shared level of logic here. That's the only thing discussion can stand on.
|
I’ve read the story of Ruth and Naomi a number of times, so no you dont have to tell me I didnt take even one minute to read the passage. I’ll come back to this later but how you reacted to claims in previous thread of how God is gay or Jesus as homosexual just proves my point that it made you feel very angry and disgusted whenever others point out there is any hint of homo-romance in the Bible.
Also, do you have anything to say in regards to my response to your other post about Paul’s verses and the context he was writing in?