Re: Boxjobox on modalism
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxjobox
I tend to think both you and Ohio would take a position based on your understanding of John 1 that God became flesh. This is probably too extreme to face, so it gets watered down to Jesus was fully God and fully man, so that somehow you can avoid contemplating God became flesh.
The questions both you and Ohio pose are endless and unanswerable for the most part because they are based on a trinitarian supposition, which is not scriptural.
I can only say again, read through Acts and see what is preached as the gospel.
|
What is too extreme to face?
Is that your response to legitimate questions? That they are "endless and unanswerable for the most part because they are based on a trinitarian supposition, which is not scriptural?" That's how you dodge the issue?
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!.
Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point!
|