[awareness]

Originally Posted by Boxjobox

I see dear brother Untohim falling in the same quandary. Wanting to discuss the WL/LSM/LC thing only in terms of orthodox, ie church doctrine/history, where as WL on one hand would dismiss the source of triunism as degraded Christianity, yet, pull up the doctrine as legitimate, yet expanding on it with his own theological views, which were steeped in the trinitarian thought. At the same time, purporting to claim scripture as the source for all his teachings, yet making a business out of his processed triune god material. Alls the while, Paul tells us there is but one God, the Father. So how do we discuss the WL/LSM problem without bringing up the “elephant in the room”? We dismiss the whole notion of there being a legitimate elephant. How can we have an honest discussion about the whole Lee thing, the whole concept about recovery, about the ministry, and remain in the 4th century orthodoxy. I tend to think recover is no longer a topic people want to consider, and I tend to think that most of those who left the LC have probably returned to “ poor, poor, christianity” and the concept, zeal for the recovery of the church, and for that matter, whether the church as any real meaning at all, has drifted into a past history worthy only of historical discussion.

What "recovery" and the "restoration" movements are missing is a Pentecost, with rushing mighty wind, tongues of fire, and speaking many languages.

That's what originated the foundational early church. Don't get that and the recovery and restoration are just hollow claims and efforts.